You’ve seen the side-by-side photos. The ones where someone has meticulously cropped a picture of a young Prince Harry next to a 1980s-era Major James Hewitt. They both have that specific shade of "flaming ginger" hair. They both have the same squinty smile and, honestly, in certain lighting, the resemblance is kinda uncanny.
It’s the conspiracy theory that just won’t die. For decades, the British tabloids have fed the public a steady diet of "secret father" narratives, suggesting that King Charles III isn’t Harry’s biological dad. It’s a story built on visual coincidences and a very real, very messy affair. But if you actually look at the dates—the boring, hard facts of the timeline—the whole thing falls apart faster than a house of cards in a gale.
The truth is much more about "sadism," as Harry himself put it, than it is about genetics.
The Timeline That Debunks Everything
Let’s get the math out of the way first. Prince Harry was born on September 15, 1984. This means he was conceived sometime around December 1983.
If James Hewitt were the father, he would have had to be in the picture then. He wasn't.
According to Ken Wharfe, Diana’s former protection officer, and Hewitt himself, the pair didn't even meet until a party in 1986. That’s two full years after Harry was already born. Diana’s longtime hairdresser, Richard Dalton, has also been vocal about this recently, noting that Harry was "already walking" by the time Hewitt entered the scene. It’s a biological impossibility.
💡 You might also like: Kellyanne Conway Age: Why Her 59th Year Matters More Than Ever
Unless you believe in time travel, the "Major Hewitt is the father" theory is dead on arrival.
Why the Rumor Persists Anyway
If the dates don't work, why are we still talking about this in 2026?
Basically, it's the hair.
The Spencer family—Diana’s side—is famous for its red hair. Her brother, Charles Spencer, had bright ginger hair. Her sisters have it. Harry is a Spencer through and through in the looks department. But for the press, "boy looks like his uncle" isn't a headline that sells papers. "Prince is a Love Child" is.
Harry went into painful detail about this in his memoir, Spare. He wrote that the rumor was a "remarkably unfunny joke" that his own father, then-Prince Charles, used to make. Charles would reportedly laugh and say, "Who knows if I’m even your real father?"
📖 Related: Melissa Gilbert and Timothy Busfield: What Really Happened Behind the Scenes
For a kid who had already lost his mother and was struggling to find his place in a rigid institution, that kind of "banter" wasn't just annoying. It was damaging. It made him feel like a laughingstock.
The Human Cost of a Tabloid "Joke"
During his 2023 High Court testimony against Mirror Group Newspapers, Harry admitted something pretty heartbreaking. He didn't actually know the timeline himself until he was about 30 years old.
Think about that for a second.
He spent his entire adolescence and early twenties wondering if the man the world called his father was actually his father. He was 18, grieving his mother, and reading stories about "plots to steal his DNA" to prove his parentage. He was genuinely afraid he might be "ousted" from the Royal Family.
He didn't realize until around 2014 that the dates made the whole thing impossible. The journalists writing the stories? They knew the dates. They just didn't care because the narrative was too profitable to kill.
👉 See also: Jeremy Renner Accident Recovery: What Really Happened Behind the Scenes
James Hewitt’s Side of the Story
James Hewitt hasn't exactly had an easy ride since the affair became public in the 90s. He’s often been cast as the villain of the piece—the man who "betrayed" Diana by cooperating with books like Princess in Love.
But on the paternity front, he has been consistent. In a 2017 interview on Australian TV, he was asked point-blank: "Are you Harry’s father?"
His answer was a simple "No."
He admitted that the red hair made for an easy comparison, but he’s always maintained that the relationship started long after Harry’s birth. At 65, Hewitt now lives a relatively quiet life in Devon, but he’s still tethered to a royal scandal he can't seem to escape.
What Most People Get Wrong
People love a scandal because it humanizes (or de-humanizes) the elite. But the "James Hewitt and Harry" saga is a prime example of how a visual coincidence can override factual reality in the public imagination.
- The Spencer Gene: Harry looks like a Spencer. If you look at photos of a young Prince Edward or even King George VI, there are facial similarities to the Windsors too, but they get ignored in favor of the "ginger" connection.
- The Affair Dates: Diana and Hewitt’s affair lasted from roughly 1986 to 1991. Harry was born in '84.
- The Motivation: Tabloids used the rumor to sell millions of copies and to paint Harry as an "outsider," which fueled his later friction with the British press.
If you’re looking for the "truth" about Harry’s parentage, you won't find it in a DNA test or a grainy side-by-side photo. You’ll find it in the 1984 birth records and the 1986 social calendar of the Princess of Wales.
Next Steps for the Curious
If you want to understand the deeper dynamics of the Royal Family during this era, look into the Spencer family tree. You'll see that the "ginger gene" has been present for generations, long before James Hewitt ever stepped onto a polo field. You might also want to read the witness statements from the 2023 MGN trial, which provide a raw, first-hand account of how these rumors affected Harry’s mental health.