You’ve seen him a thousand times. A tall man in a sweeping black cape, clutching a doctor’s bag, fading into a thick London fog under the dim glow of a flickering gas lamp. It’s the definitive Jack the Ripper image. It is also, honestly, almost certainly a lie.
The Victorian press basically invented the "gentleman ripper" out of thin air to sell newspapers. They needed a monster that looked the part. But if you look at the actual police files from 1888, the sketches and descriptions tell a very different story—one that’s much more grounded, much scruffier, and way more terrifying because of how ordinary he seemed.
The Ripper's Face: What the Witnesses Actually Saw
We don't have a photo of the killer. We never will. But we do have descriptions from people who might have actually looked him in the eye.
Take Elizabeth Long, for example. She saw a man talking to Annie Chapman (the second victim) just before she was killed. She described someone around forty, slightly taller than Chapman, wearing a dark coat and a "shabby genteel" hat. He looked like a foreigner, she said. Then there was George Hutchinson, who gave one of the most detailed descriptions ever recorded. He claimed the man he saw with Mary Jane Kelly was about 5'6", with a pale complexion, a dark mustache turned up at the ends, and a heavy gold watch chain.
Wait, check that.
Hutchinson's account is weirdly specific. So specific that many modern "Ripperologists" think he was lying or even that he was the killer himself trying to lead the police on a wild goose chase. Most other witnesses, like Joseph Lawende, describe a much more average-looking guy. Lawende saw a man with a reddish mustache wearing a salt-and-pepper jacket and a peaked cloth cap.
Does that sound like a cape-wearing aristocrat to you? Nope. It sounds like a local.
Why the "Top Hat and Cape" Image Stuck
If the witnesses saw a guy in a cloth cap, why do we all picture a guy in a top hat?
📖 Related: Al Pacino Angels in America: Why His Roy Cohn Still Terrifies Us
- The Media Circus: The Illustrated Police News loved a good scare. They started drawing the Ripper as a "ghoul" or a "shining phantom" to represent the "Nemesis of Neglect" haunting the East End slums.
- The Class Divide: There was a popular theory that no "low-class" East Ender could have such surgical skill. People wanted to believe the killer was an outsider, maybe a doctor or even royalty like Prince Albert Victor.
- Stage Plays: Early theatrical versions of the story, like The Lodger, cemented the visual of the mysterious, well-dressed stranger.
Basically, the Jack the Ripper image we have today is a 130-year-old marketing campaign.
The Reality of the "Canonical Five" Photos
When people search for a Jack the Ripper image, they often stumble upon the most grisly part of the case: the victim photos. These are real. They are haunting. They are also some of the first examples of "crime scene photography" in history.
For most of the victims—Mary Ann Nichols, Annie Chapman, Elizabeth Stride, and Catherine Eddowes—the only photos we have are "morgue shots." These were taken after the bodies had been moved and cleaned up slightly. They aren't "scenes of the crime."
The exception is Mary Jane Kelly.
She was the only victim killed indoors, in her small room at 13 Miller’s Court. The photo of her room is the only true "crime scene" Jack the Ripper image we have. It is notoriously brutal. It’s also a vital piece of evidence that shows the killer wasn't just a murderer—he was someone who felt safe enough to spend a long time in that room. He wasn't a ghost disappearing into the fog; he was a man who knew the neighborhood.
Modern Reconstructions: Bringing a Ghost to Life
Lately, people have tried to use AI and forensic software to create a "real" Jack the Ripper image based on witness descriptions.
In 2006, a team from Scotland Yard used E-FIT technology (the stuff they use for modern "wanted" posters) to build a composite of the suspect. They used the descriptions from Lawende and Long. The result? A man with a very strong jaw, a heavy mustache, and deep-set eyes. He looks... well, like a guy you’d see at a London pub today.
👉 See also: Adam Scott in Step Brothers: Why Derek is Still the Funniest Part of the Movie
He doesn't look like a movie monster. He looks like a neighbor.
The Suspects: Do We Have His Picture Already?
What if the Jack the Ripper image is sitting in a police archive right now, labeled with a different name? There are dozens of suspects, but a few have "faces" that researchers return to over and over.
Aaron Kosminski
He’s the "DNA suspect." A Polish barber living in Whitechapel. In 2014, a researcher claimed that DNA on a shawl from the Catherine Eddowes crime scene matched Kosminski’s descendants. Most scientists think the DNA evidence is cross-contaminated and useless, but Kosminski’s mugshot remains one of the most analyzed photos in the case. He looks gaunt, troubled, and very much like a man who struggled with his mental health.
Montague John Druitt
The "Gentleman Suspect." Druitt was a schoolteacher and barrister who drowned himself in the Thames shortly after the final murder. If you want the "suave" Ripper, he’s your guy. His photos show a handsome, athletic man. But there’s zero evidence linking him to the crimes other than the timing of his death.
Walter Sickert
The "Artist Suspect." Famous painter. Crime novelist Patricia Cornwell famously spent millions trying to prove he was the Ripper. She pointed to his paintings, like Jack the Ripper’s Bedroom, which she claimed showed details only the killer would know. Sickert’s face is well-documented in portraits and photos—he was a bit of a dandy with a penchant for costumes.
How to View Ripper History Responsibly
Look, "Ripperology" can get dark. It’s easy to get lost in the "mystery" and forget that five real women—Mary Ann, Annie, Elizabeth, Catherine, and Mary Jane—lost their lives in a terrifying way.
If you're looking for a Jack the Ripper image, the most "accurate" ones aren't the drawings of a guy in a cape. They are the photos of the Whitechapel streets themselves.
✨ Don't miss: Actor Most Academy Awards: The Record Nobody Is Breaking Anytime Soon
What to look for in archival photos:
- Commercial Street: You can still find photos from 1888 showing the horse-drawn carriages and the Ten Bells pub.
- Dorset Street: Known then as the "worst street in London." The photos of the narrow, crowded alleyways explain why the killer could vanish so easily.
- The Goulston Street Graffito: There is a photograph of a message written in chalk on a wall that said, "The Juwes are the men That Will not be Blamed for nothing." The police washed it off before it could be properly analyzed, but it’s a rare "image" of the killer’s own handiwork.
The Actionable Truth
If you want to understand the real story behind the Jack the Ripper image, stop looking at the Hollywood versions.
First, read Hallie Rubenhold’s book The Five. It shifts the focus away from the "cool mystery" of the killer and back to the lives of the women. It changes how you see the photos.
Second, if you ever visit London, don't just go on a "ghost tour." Go to the Museum of London Docklands. They have an incredible collection of 19th-century East End artifacts. Seeing the actual lanterns the police carried and the rough wool clothes people wore makes the whole thing feel less like a movie and more like the tragic history it actually is.
Third, be skeptical of "newly discovered" photos or "hidden diaries." The Ripper industry is huge, and forgeries are everywhere. If someone claims they found a definitive Jack the Ripper image in an attic, they're probably trying to sell you a book.
The most honest Jack the Ripper image isn't a face at all. It’s the shadow of a crowded, poor, and neglected Victorian city that allowed a killer to walk the streets and disappear into history.