It is one of the most haunting images in the history of art. A man with bulging, manic eyes clutches a younger man whose head is spilling blood onto a red carpet. The older man is Ivan IV, the first Tsar of All the Russias. The dying man is his own son and heir.
For centuries, the story of how Ivan the Terrible kills his son has been treated as an absolute fact of history. It’s the ultimate cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked power and a legendary temper. But like most things involving the 16th-century Kremlin, the truth is a messy mix of eyewitness rumors, political hit pieces, and a heavy dose of Victorian-era drama.
Honestly, if you look at the evidence, the case is a lot more complicated than a single blow with a walking stick.
The Night Everything Fell Apart
The date was November 16, 1581. The location was the Alexandrov Sloboda, a fortified residence outside Moscow where Ivan was basically hiding out from the world.
According to the most famous version of events—popularized by a Jesuit priest named Antonio Possevino—the trouble started over a dress. Ivan allegedly walked into the chambers of his daughter-in-law, Yelena Sheremeteva, who was pregnant at the time. He thought her clothing was "immodest" (she was supposedly wearing only one or two layers of dress instead of the standard three).
In a fit of religious or patriarchal rage, Ivan started beating her.
His son, Tsarevich Ivan Ivanovich, heard the screams and rushed in to defend his wife. The two men—both named Ivan, both famously hot-headed—got into a screaming match. The younger Ivan supposedly reproached his father for his military failures and for his cruelty toward Yelena.
💡 You might also like: Why a Man Hits Girl for Bullying Incidents Go Viral and What They Reveal About Our Breaking Point
In the heat of the moment, the Tsar raised his heavy, iron-tipped staff. He struck his son a glancing blow to the head, right at the temple.
The Tsarevich collapsed.
Ivan’s rage turned to instant, soul-crushing regret. He threw himself onto his son, trying to stop the bleeding, crying out for help. But the damage was done. His son lingered for a few days in a feverish state before dying on November 19.
Did He Actually Do It?
The thing is, we don't actually know for sure.
The main source for this story, Antonio Possevino, wasn't in the room. He wasn't even in the building. He arrived in Russia later and heard the story through the grapevine. Historians like Nikolai Karamzin later cemented the murder as historical fact in the 19th century, but modern scholarship is more skeptical.
The Poison Theory
In 1963, Soviet scientists opened the tombs of Ivan the Terrible and his son in the Cathedral of the Archangel. They were looking for physical proof of a skull fracture.
📖 Related: Why are US flags at half staff today and who actually makes that call?
They didn't find it.
The Tsarevich’s skull had largely crumbled away due to moisture in the tomb, making it impossible to confirm a blow to the head. However, what they did find was staggering levels of mercury and arsenic. The levels were 32 times higher than what you'd expect to see in a normal human body.
Some people argue this proves the Tsarevich was poisoned by his father's enemies. Others point out that mercury was basically the "essential oil" of the 16th century. It was used to treat everything from skin rashes to syphilis. Ivan himself took so much mercury for his arthritis that it likely contributed to his legendary paranoia and "madness."
Why the Painting Changed Everything
If the historical record is blurry, why are we so convinced Ivan the Terrible kills his son?
You can blame Ilya Repin.
In 1885, Repin unveiled his masterpiece, Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan on 16 November 1581. It is a terrifying painting. The way the light hits the blood on the floor and the sheer, unadulterated horror in the Tsar’s eyes makes it feel like you’re witnessing a real crime.
👉 See also: Elecciones en Honduras 2025: ¿Quién va ganando realmente según los últimos datos?
Repin actually painted it as a reaction to the political violence of his own time—specifically the assassination of Tsar Alexander II. He wanted to show the "bleeding" of Russia.
The painting was so controversial that it became the first censored artwork in Russia. Tsar Alexander III banned it from public view. Even today, Russian nationalists hate the painting. They’ve even attacked it with knives and metal poles in the Tretyakov Gallery, claiming it's a piece of "Western propaganda" designed to make Russian history look more brutal than it was.
The Real Consequence: The Time of Troubles
Regardless of whether the blow was fatal or if the kid just died of a mercury-induced fever, the outcome was the same: the Rurik dynasty was doomed.
The Tsarevich was the only person capable of ruling after his father. Ivan’s other son, Feodor, was intellectually disabled and not fit for the throne. When Ivan died three years after his son, Russia spiraled into what historians call the "Time of Troubles"—a period of civil war, famine, and foreign invasion that nearly wiped the country off the map.
Basically, by "killing" his heir—whether through a staff or through a toxic environment—Ivan destroyed his own legacy.
Practical Insights for History Buffs
If you're digging into the Romanovs or the Rurikids, keep these things in mind:
- Always check the source. If the person writing the history was a political rival (like Possevino or Prince Kurbsky), take the gore with a grain of salt.
- Museums matter. If you're ever in Moscow, the Tretyakov Gallery is where the Repin painting lives (usually behind very thick glass). Seeing it in person is a completely different experience from a screen.
- Mercury was everywhere. When reading about "mad" kings in this era, always consider that they were likely being slowly poisoned by their own doctors.
The story of the Tsar and his son isn't just about a murder. It’s about how a single moment of lost control can change the course of an entire empire for a century.
To get a better sense of how this event shaped the future of the Russian throne, you should look into the rise of the Romanov dynasty, which eventually filled the power vacuum left by Ivan's dead son. You might also want to research the "False Dmitrys," the pretenders who claimed to be Ivan's other son to seize power during the chaos that followed.