Honestly, the 2024 election felt like a fever dream for most of the country. One minute Joe Biden is the nominee, then suddenly he isn't, and Kamala Harris is sprinting through a 100-day campaign that basically reset the entire political map. People are still asking: is there any chance Kamala could win? Well, looking back from 2026, we know the answer is a historical "no" because the results are already in the books. Donald Trump took 312 electoral votes to her 226.
But if you're asking about the possibility she had—the "what if" that keeps political nerds up at night—the answer is actually pretty fascinating.
She almost pulled it off.
👉 See also: Steven Bailey St Louis Park: What Really Happened at Park Tavern
The margins in the "Blue Wall" states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin were tight enough that a few small shifts could have changed everything. It wasn't some massive blowout where she never had a prayer. It was a dogfight.
Is There Any Chance Kamala Could Win the Electoral College?
When we look at the actual data from the November 5, 2024, vote, the math for a Harris victory was surprisingly straightforward on paper. She needed the Blue Wall. If she had held Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, the map would have looked entirely different.
Instead, she lost all seven major swing states.
It wasn't just the rust belt, either. Nevada went Republican for the first time since 2004. Arizona and Georgia, which Biden flipped in 2020, slid back to Trump.
Why the "Blue Wall" Crumbled
A lot of people think she lost because of her personality or her laugh, but the data suggests something way more boring: the price of eggs. Honestly, the "incumbency curse" was real in 2024. Everywhere in the world, from the UK to Japan, voters were kicking out whoever was in charge because of post-pandemic inflation.
✨ Don't miss: How Many Eligible Voters in the U.S. Actually Exist?
Harris was tied to the Biden administration’s record. Even though she tried to pivot toward a "New Way Forward," voters in places like Erie, Pennsylvania, and Macomb County, Michigan, weren't feeling it. They remembered $2.00 gas and cheaper rent, and they associated that with the Trump years.
- The Economic Gap: Trump won voters who prioritized the economy by huge margins.
- The Border: While Harris promised to sign the bipartisan border bill, the "Border Czar" label stuck too well.
- Late Start: She only had about 100 days to introduce herself to a country that had already spent years forming an opinion of her as Vice President.
The Demographic Shift Nobody Saw Coming
If you want to know is there any chance Kamala could win in a different scenario, you have to look at the groups that traditionally vote Democratic.
Something broke in 2024.
For decades, Democrats relied on a massive lead with Latino and Black men. That lead didn't just shrink; it cratered. Pew Research later showed that Trump nearly reached parity with Latino voters—getting 48% to her 51%. In a race decided by percentages, that's a death blow.
👉 See also: Is There an Age Limit to Be President? Why the Rules Might Surprise You
The Young Voter Problem
Remember the "brat" summer? The TikTok memes? The coconut tree? For a few weeks in August, it looked like Harris had the youth vote locked down. But memes don't always translate to ballots.
Actually, she underperformed Biden's 2020 numbers with voters under 30 by about 6 points. It turns out young people were just as worried about the cost of living and housing as their parents were. The cultural energy was there, but the economic buy-in wasn't.
What Could Have Been: The "What-If" Scenarios
Political analysts like Stanley B. Greenberg have argued that Harris could have won if a few things had gone differently. For instance, what if Biden had stepped aside a year earlier?
The late entry forced her to keep Biden's campaign staff and much of his infrastructure. She didn't have time to hold a traditional primary, which might have helped her "battle-test" her messaging and build an identity separate from the White House.
There was also the "Shapiro Factor." Many experts still debate whether picking Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro over Tim Walz would have secured the 19 electoral votes from the Keystone State. Shapiro had sky-high approval ratings in the one state Harris absolutely had to win. Would it have been enough? We’ll never truly know, but it’s the kind of decision that gets analyzed in every post-election post-mortem.
Lessons for the Future
The 2024 results changed how we think about American politics. It wasn't a fluke.
If there is any chance for a candidate like Harris to win in the future, the Democratic party has to figure out how to talk to rural and working-class voters again. You can't just win in the cities and expect to take the Electoral College.
Trump won rural areas by 40 points. That's a massive hill to climb for any Democrat.
Actionable Insights for Following Future Elections:
- Watch the "Churn": In 2024, 30 million people who voted in 2020 stayed home. These "churn" voters decide elections more than the people who switch parties.
- Ignore the Memes: Digital hype is great for fundraising, but ground-game and economic messaging are what actually move the needle in swing states.
- Track Demographics, Not Just Geography: The shift of Latino and Black men toward the GOP is a long-term trend, not a one-time event. Watch for how candidates address this in 2028.
- The Economy is King: Regardless of social issues, the candidate perceived as "better for my wallet" has won the majority of presidential elections in the last 40 years.
The 2024 chapter is closed, but the reasons why Kamala Harris didn't win are going to be the blueprint for every campaign for the next decade.