It usually happens during a protest. You see a flicker of orange, a plume of acrid black smoke, and suddenly, the Stars and Stripes are catching fire on a grainy news feed. It’s visceral. For some, it’s a punch to the gut. For others, it’s the ultimate expression of defiance. But almost every time it happens, a flurry of questions hits the internet: Is that allowed? Can they get arrested for that? Basically, is it legal to burn the American flag in the United States?
The short answer is yes. It's totally legal.
But the "why" behind that answer is a winding road through the Supreme Court, messy political battles, and a fundamental misunderstanding of what "freedom of speech" actually covers. Most people think of speech as just talking. The law thinks of it as much more.
The Case That Changed Everything: Texas v. Johnson
Back in 1984, the Republican National Convention was happening in Dallas. A man named Gregory Lee Johnson, a member of the Revolutionary Communist Youth Brigade, doused a flag in kerosene and lit it up. He didn't hurt anyone. He didn't steal the flag (someone else did, but he was the one who burned it). He was protesting the policies of the Reagan administration.
Texas had a law on the books then. It was a "venerated objects" law, making it a crime to desecrate the flag. Johnson was fined $2,000 and sentenced to a year in prison. He appealed.
The case eventually landed at the Supreme Court in 1989. In a 5-4 decision that crossed traditional ideological lines, the Court ruled that burning the flag was "symbolic speech." Justice William Brennan wrote the majority opinion. He argued that if there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it's that the government cannot prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable.
It was a landmark moment. It essentially told the government: you don't have to like the message, but you can't jail the messenger just for using a symbol to convey it.
Why Scalia Voted "Yes"
One of the most fascinating parts of this history is Justice Antonin Scalia. He was a staunch conservative, a "law and order" guy through and through. He personally loathed flag burning. He once famously said that if he were king, he would put "scruffy, beard-wearing flag burners" in jail.
👉 See also: Ethics in the News: What Most People Get Wrong
But he wasn't king. He was a judge.
Scalia voted with the majority to protect flag burning. Why? Because he was an originalist. He believed the Constitution meant what it said. To him, the First Amendment’s protection of "speech" necessarily included expressive conduct. If you start picking and choosing which symbols people are allowed to destroy to make a point, the whole concept of liberty starts to crumble. Honestly, it’s one of the best examples of a judge putting the law above their personal feelings.
The Flag Protection Act of 1989: A Short-Lived Revenge
Politicians were livid. President George H.W. Bush called the ruling a "profound mistake." Congress scrambled. They didn't want to try to pass a Constitutional Amendment yet—that's a huge, grueling process—so they tried to pass a law instead.
They called it the Flag Protection Act of 1989.
The goal was to bypass the Texas v. Johnson ruling by making it a federal crime to burn the flag regardless of the "message." They thought they could frame it as protecting the physical integrity of the flag rather than suppressing speech.
It didn't work.
Literally the day the law went into effect, people burned flags in Seattle and Washington, D.C., to challenge it. The cases were fast-tracked to the Supreme Court as United States v. Eichman (1990). The Court didn't flinch. They struck down the federal law, too. The 5-4 split held firm. Since then, the legal reality has been settled: legal to burn the American flag is the law of the land.
✨ Don't miss: When is the Next Hurricane Coming 2024: What Most People Get Wrong
When Burning a Flag Can Actually Get You Arrested
Now, don't go thinking this is a free pass to start fires wherever you want. There’s a massive difference between the act of burning a flag as a protest and the circumstances under which you do it.
If you steal your neighbor's flag from their porch and burn it, you aren't going to jail for flag burning. You're going to jail for theft and probably destruction of property. If you light a flag on fire in the middle of a crowded dry forest during a burn ban, you’re getting hit with reckless endangerment and arson charges.
Context is everything.
- Public Safety: You can't start a fire that threatens bystanders.
- Property Rights: You have to own the flag you are burning.
- Incitement: If you burn a flag specifically to start a riot or incite immediate violence (the "fighting words" doctrine), you might find yourself in a legal gray area.
Basically, the First Amendment protects the idea you are expressing by burning the flag. It doesn't protect you from fire codes or larceny laws.
The "Proper" Way to Burn the Flag
Here is the irony that trips a lot of people up: The U.S. Flag Code actually recommends burning the flag.
When a flag is so worn, tattered, or soiled that it’s no longer fit for display, the Flag Code (Title 4, Section 8k) states: "The flag, when it is in such condition that it is no longer a fitting emblem for display, should be destroyed in a dignified way, preferably by burning."
This is why organizations like the American Legion and the Boy Scouts hold formal "retirement ceremonies." They build a respectful fire, fold the flags, and place them into the flames while people stand at attention or salute.
🔗 Read more: What Really Happened With Trump Revoking Mayorkas Secret Service Protection
So, technically, the government's preferred method of disposal is exactly what protesters use to signal dissent. The difference is entirely about intent and "dignity." But from a purely legal standpoint, the Supreme Court has ruled that the government can't mandate "dignity."
Why We Still Talk About This
Every few years, someone suggests a Constitutional Amendment to ban flag desecration. It’s a guaranteed way to stir up a base. Between 1995 and 2006, the House of Representatives passed several amendments to do just that. They usually died in the Senate. In 2006, a proposed amendment missed the required two-thirds majority in the Senate by just one single vote.
The debate is rarely about the flag itself. It's about what the flag represents.
To a veteran who saw their friends die under that cloth, burning it feels like a physical assault on their sacrifice. To a protester who feels betrayed by their government, burning it is a way to say, "The ideals this flag claims to represent are on fire."
A Global Perspective
It’s worth noting that the U.S. is somewhat of an outlier here. In many countries, even democratic ones, "insulting national symbols" is a crime. In Germany, you can face up to three years in prison for disparaging the federal flag. In France, it’s a heavy fine. In some authoritarian regimes, it's a death sentence or a "disappearance."
The fact that it is legal to burn the American flag is, paradoxically, one of the strongest proofs that the First Amendment is working. It shows that the state isn't powerful enough to force you to respect its symbols.
Actionable Insights: What You Should Know
If you are ever in a situation where this comes up—whether you're witnessing a protest, participating in one, or arguing about it at Thanksgiving—keep these points in mind:
- Check Local Fire Ordinances: If you plan on a "ceremonial retirement" of a flag or a protest, you still have to follow local fire department rules. You can't just light a bonfire on a sidewalk in NYC.
- Know the Difference Between Laws and Amendments: Currently, there is no law or amendment that prohibits flag burning. Any state law that says otherwise is "unconstitutional" and unenforceable thanks to Texas v. Johnson.
- Identify Your Flag: If you're retiring a flag, contact a local VFW (Veterans of Foreign Wars) post. They usually have a drop-box for old flags and perform the burning ceremonies correctly and safely.
- Understand Symbolic Speech: The Supreme Court hasn't just protected flag burning; they've protected wearing black armbands, sitting down during the anthem, and even wearing a jacket that says "F*** the Draft." Expression isn't just words; it's actions.
The law doesn't protect the flag because the flag is unimportant. It protects the right to burn the flag because freedom of expression is more important. Whether you think it's a disgusting act or a necessary one, the legal reality is firm: the fire stays legal as long as it's your flag and you aren't hurting anyone.
If you find yourself with a flag that's seen better days, don't just throw it in the trash—that's actually considered more disrespectful than burning. Reach out to a local civic group for a proper disposal ceremony. It's the one time everyone, from the protesters to the generals, agrees on the method, even if they disagree on the reason.