When the topic of "is Donald Trump crazy" comes up, people usually stop being objective pretty fast. It’s a lightning rod. You have one side calling him a "stable genius" and the other side practically screaming for a straightjacket. Honestly, the word "crazy" is a mess of a term anyway. It doesn’t actually mean anything in a medical sense, but we use it as a catch-all for "I don't understand why this person does what they do."
But if you move past the name-calling, there is a massive, high-stakes debate happening in the world of psychiatry and psychology.
It’s not just Twitter noise. We are talking about Ivy League professors, the American Psychiatric Association (APA), and the literal "bible" of mental health, the DSM-5.
The Goldwater Rule: Why doctors usually stay quiet
Back in 1964, a magazine polled thousands of psychiatrists about whether Barry Goldwater was fit to be president. The results were a disaster. Some called him a "dangerous lunatic," and it turned into a massive ethical scandal. Because of that, the APA created the Goldwater Rule.
Basically, it says it is unethical for a psychiatrist to give a professional opinion about a public figure without examining them in person and getting their permission.
For years, this was the law of the land. Then came 2016.
When Trump started gaining momentum, the rule started to buckle. Dr. Bandy Lee, a forensic psychiatrist who taught at Yale, became one of the most vocal critics. She edited a book called The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump, which featured essays from 27 mental health experts. They argued they had a "duty to warn" the public. In their view, staying silent wasn't being ethical—it was being complicit in a public health crisis.
👉 See also: Jackson General Hospital of Jackson TN: The Truth About Navigating West Tennessee’s Medical Hub
Narcissism vs. "Craziness"
Most experts who weigh in on Trump don't actually use the word "crazy." They talk about Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD).
Now, we all know someone who is a bit of a narcissist. But clinical NPD is a different beast. It’s defined by a grandiose sense of self-importance, a desperate need for constant admiration, and—this is the big one—a total lack of empathy.
Dr. John Gartner, a psychologist who has been tracking Trump for years, takes it a step further. He often uses the term Malignant Narcissism. This isn't a formal diagnosis in the DSM, but it’s a concept developed by Erich Fromm and Otto Kernberg. It’s a "toxic brew" of four things:
- Narcissism
- Antisocial behavior (breaking rules/lying)
- Paranoia
- Sadism (taking pleasure in the suffering of others)
Is he "crazy" because of these things? Not necessarily. People with these traits are often extremely high-functioning. They know exactly what they are doing. In fact, some argue that his "unhinged" behavior is a calculated performance to keep his base energized.
The 2024-2026 Shift: Cognitive Decline or Just Age?
Lately, the conversation has shifted. It’s less about personality and more about cognitive decline.
During the 2024 campaign and into 2025, people started pointing to "word salad"—times when Trump would trail off, mix up names (like Nikki Haley and Nancy Pelosi), or make strange, guttural noises during speeches. Dr. Gartner and others have pointed to these as potential signs of "phonemic paraphasias," which are basically linguistic glitches that can hint at organic brain issues like dementia.
✨ Don't miss: Images of the Mitochondria: Why Most Diagrams are Kinda Wrong
But here is the catch: diagnosing someone from a TV clip is incredibly risky.
Trump’s defenders, and even some neutral medical experts, point out that he has always spoken in a "stream of consciousness" style. He’s 79. Most people at that age have "senior moments." Plus, he recently defended his health by mentioning he had a CT scan that showed no issues. His team often attributes his slips to exhaustion or "sarcasm" that the media just doesn't get.
The "Sanewashing" Debate
There is a term that’s been floating around newsrooms recently: Sanewashing.
It’s the idea that the media takes Trump’s most incoherent or "crazy" rants and edits them into a neat, summarized paragraph that makes him sound like a normal politician. If you only read the summary, you miss the ten-minute tangent about sharks or electric boats.
When people ask "is Donald Trump crazy," they are often reacting to the raw, unedited footage that doesn't make it into the 6 o'clock news.
What actually matters for the public?
Kinda doesn't matter if he meets the clinical definition of "crazy" if the behavior is the same. The real question for voters and observers isn't about a secret medical file. It’s about fitness.
🔗 Read more: How to Hit Rear Delts with Dumbbells: Why Your Back Is Stealing the Gains
Fitness is a legal and political standard, not just a medical one. The 25th Amendment exists for a reason, but it has a incredibly high bar. It requires the Vice President and a majority of the Cabinet to agree that the President is "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office."
So far, that has never happened.
Actionable Insights: How to Evaluate the "Crazy" Claims
If you're trying to cut through the noise, here is how you should look at it:
- Watch the unedited footage. Don't just read the headlines or the "sanewashed" summaries. See the full context of the speeches.
- Distinguish between personality and pathology. Being aggressive, loud, or self-centered is a personality style. Losing the ability to follow a thought or recognize people is a medical pathology.
- Check the source. Is the person diagnosing him a political pundit or a medical professional? Even then, remember the Goldwater Rule—no one knows the full story without a clinical exam.
- Look for patterns. A single slip-up is just a slip-up. A consistent, worsening inability to communicate or control impulses is what doctors look for when assessing decline.
The debate over whether Donald Trump is "crazy" isn't going away. It’s basically part of the American landscape now. But by looking at the specific traits like malignant narcissism or cognitive decline, you get a much clearer picture than the "crazy" label ever provides.
To stay informed, you can track official White House medical releases or follow the ongoing debates in journals like The New England Journal of Medicine regarding the ethics of the Goldwater Rule in the modern era.