Ever sat around wondering if you’re actually smarter than the person running the country? It’s a classic bar debate. Honestly, we love to dissect the "genius" of our leaders—or lack thereof. But measuring the IQs of presidents ranked is a lot harder than just handing a Scantron to the Commander in Chief. Most of these guys died way before modern IQ testing was even a thing.
So, how do we know who was a bona fide polymath and who was just... okay?
UC Davis psychologist Dean Keith Simonton is the guy everyone goes to for this. In 2006, he released a massive study in the journal Political Psychology that basically used "historiometry." He looked at biographies, early writings, and personality traits to estimate the cognitive horsepower of the first 42 presidents. He wasn't looking for a perfect number, but rather a way to see how "Intellectual Brilliance" correlates with being a good leader.
Spoiler alert: Being a genius doesn't automatically make you a great president.
The Top Tier: The Actual Geniuses
When you look at the IQs of presidents ranked at the top, one name consistently sits at the peak.
John Quincy Adams usually clocks in with an estimated IQ around 175. This guy was a total child prodigy. He was fluent in seven languages and was reading heavy philosophy while most of us were still figuring out long division. He basically grew up in the halls of European diplomacy. But despite being arguably the smartest man to ever sit in the Oval Office, his presidency was kind of a slog. He struggled with a hostile Congress and never really connected with the "common man."
👉 See also: Why People That Died on Their Birthday Are More Common Than You Think
Then you have Thomas Jefferson at 160. Jefferson is the ultimate "Renaissance Man." He wasn't just a politician; he was an architect, a botanist, and an inventor. If you've ever seen Monticello, you know the guy's brain never turned off.
The Modern Heavyweights
It’s not just the Founding Fathers hogging the high scores.
- Bill Clinton: Estimated around 159. A Rhodes Scholar who could (and still can) talk your ear off about the nuances of obscure policy papers.
- John F. Kennedy: Usually ranked near 159.8, though he famously scored a 119 on a test as a kid before he really "applied himself."
- Jimmy Carter: Sitting at 156.8. He was a nuclear engineer. You don't get that job by being average.
What Happens at the Bottom of the List?
Let’s be real. This is the part people usually scroll down to find.
Ulysses S. Grant often finds himself near the bottom of these rankings with an estimated 130. Now, keep in mind, a 130 IQ is still technically "gifted" in the general population. It’s the top 2-3%. But in the context of the White House, it's on the lower end. Grant was a brilliant military strategist, but he famously hated the "intellectual" side of politics and the boardroom maneuvering of the Gilded Age.
Warren G. Harding is another one. Simonton’s data suggests he might have been the lowest of the 20th-century bunch, with estimates dipping as low as 124. Harding himself once famously said, "I am not fit for this office and should never have been here." At least he was honest, right?
✨ Don't miss: Marie Kondo The Life Changing Magic of Tidying Up: What Most People Get Wrong
And then there's the George W. Bush debate. Simonton estimated his IQ at roughly 125. For years, people passed around a fake "Lovenstein Institute" report that claimed Bush had an IQ of 91. That was a total hoax. A 125 IQ puts him well above the average college graduate. He had a Harvard MBA and a Yale degree. You might disagree with his policies, but the "dumb" narrative doesn't actually hold up against the data.
Why Intelligence Isn't Everything
Here is the weird thing: Simonton found that while IQ correlates with "greatness" in historical rankings, it’s not a straight line.
Some of our most "effective" presidents weren't necessarily the ones with the highest IQs. Theodore Roosevelt (IQ 153) was brilliant, but his success came from his insane energy and "bully pulpit" charisma. On the flip side, Abraham Lincoln (IQ 150) was largely self-taught. His genius wasn't just raw processing power; it was emotional intelligence and timing.
There's actually a theory called the "Leader Distance" theory. It suggests that if a leader's IQ is too much higher than the people they lead (more than 30 points or so), they actually become less effective. They can't communicate their ideas simply. They seem "out of touch."
Think about it. If you're a 175-IQ John Quincy Adams trying to explain trade tariffs to a 100-IQ farmer in 1825, there's going to be a massive communication gap.
🔗 Read more: Why Transparent Plus Size Models Are Changing How We Actually Shop
The Problem With the Rankings
We have to take all of this with a grain of salt.
- Bias: Historians who like a president’s legacy tend to rate their "brilliance" higher.
- Historiometry: You’re guessing based on old letters. It's not like we can go back and give George Washington a Raven’s Progressive Matrices test.
- Different types of smarts: Being a "policy wonk" like Nixon (IQ 155) is different from being a "communicator" like Reagan (IQ 130).
Takeaways: What This Means for You
Looking at the IQs of presidents ranked is fun for trivia, but it’s a great reminder that "raw brainpower" is just one tool in the shed.
If you want to apply these presidential insights to your own life, keep these things in mind:
- Focus on "Openness": Simonton found that "Openness to Experience" was actually a better predictor of presidential success than raw IQ. Being willing to change your mind is a superpower.
- Communication is King: It doesn't matter if you have a 180 IQ if you can't explain your vision to the person sitting next to you.
- Don't Overthink the Number: Most of these guys were "smart enough." Beyond a certain threshold (usually around 120), other factors like grit, empathy, and social skills matter way more.
If you’re curious about how your own brain stacks up, don't just look at a number. Look at what you’re doing with it. After all, the smartest guy on this list had one of the most frustrating presidencies in history.
Want to see how these guys were actually ranked by historians for their performance? You can check out the latest C-SPAN Presidential Historian Survey to see if the "geniuses" actually topped the list of best leaders. Spoiler: They didn't always.