History is messy. We like to think of it as a series of neat boxes—the Middle Ages, the Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution—but those boxes are usually built centuries after the people inside them have died. When we talk about inventing the Renaissance Ada Palmer provides one of the most provocative and necessary reality checks in modern historiography. She’s a University of Chicago professor, a Hugo Award-winning novelist, and someone who spends a lot of time thinking about how we "brand" the past.
The Renaissance wasn't a sudden burst of light after a long, dark nap.
It was a deliberate construction. Honestly, the way we teach it in school—where everyone suddenly started painting better and reading Greek because they "rediscovered" humanity—is mostly a marketing campaign that started in the 1300s and got a massive boost in the 19th century. Palmer’s work, particularly her insights into the intellectual history of the period, forces us to look at the grime, the radicalism, and the sheer weirdness of how we created the myth of "The Renaissance."
The Myth of the "Dark Ages" and the Great Rebrand
Petrarch was the original influencer. Back in the 14th century, he was the one who started complaining that he lived in a "dark" age compared to the glory of Rome. He was basically the guy at the party telling everyone the music used to be better. Ada Palmer often points out that this narrative—the idea of a "rebirth"—was a tool used by humanists to justify their own existence. They needed to frame the preceding centuries as a void so their own work looked like a miraculous recovery.
It worked. It worked so well that we still use their terminology today.
But if you look at the 12th century, you see universities being founded, complex philosophy, and massive technological leaps. So why do we call it "The Renaissance" starting later? Because the people in the 1400s and 1500s were better at PR. They curated an image of themselves as the heirs to Apollo while living in a world that was still deeply, vibrantly, and sometimes violently medieval.
Why the Term "Renaissance" is a 19th-Century Invention
The word itself didn't even exist in the way we use it until much later. Jules Michelet and Jacob Burckhardt are the ones you can thank (or blame) for the modern concept. In the 1800s, they were looking for a "birth of the modern individual." They wanted a secular, rational ancestor to bridge the gap between the "superstitious" Middle Ages and the "enlightened" modern world.
Palmer’s scholarship highlights how this 19th-century lens distorted our view. We see the David or the Mona Lisa and think Ah, yes, progress. We don't see the fact that these artists were often obsessed with magic, astrology, and religious mysticism that would make a modern scientist's head spin.
The Radicalism of Recovery
When Palmer talks about inventing the Renaissance, she often dives into the radical nature of what it meant to find an old book. Imagine finding a hard drive from 2,000 years ago that completely contradicted everything your government and church told you about how the universe works. That’s what happened when Lucretius’s De Rerum Natura was rediscovered in 1417.
Lucretius was an atomist. He argued that the world was made of tiny particles, there was no afterlife, and the gods—if they existed—didn't care about you. This was dangerous stuff.
Palmer’s research into how these ideas were handled is fascinating. People didn't just read these books and become atheists overnight. Instead, they performed incredible mental gymnastics to reconcile ancient pagan philosophy with strict Catholic dogma. This "splicing" of ideas is the real heart of the period. It wasn't a clean break from the past; it was a messy, often terrifying attempt to fit two different worlds together.
The Problem of Censorship
We often imagine the Renaissance as a time of free-thinking. It wasn't. It was a time of intense, high-stakes censorship. Palmer has spent years studying the "Inquisition of the mind." If you wrote something radical, you didn't just get canceled on social media; you might actually get burned.
She points out that writers developed complex "codes." They would argue for a radical idea by pretending to refute it, or they’d bury their most dangerous thoughts in the middle of a massive, boring Latin tomb where only a few experts would find them. This creates a massive challenge for historians today. We have to read between the lines to see what they were actually trying to say.
✨ Don't miss: Why light gray sheer curtains are the smartest design move you aren't making
Information Revolutions: Then and Now
There is a reason Ada Palmer’s work on the Renaissance resonates so much with the digital age. She often draws parallels between the printing press and the internet. Both technologies fundamentally broke the "gatekeeping" of information.
When the printing press arrived, the "experts" lost control. Suddenly, any fringe thinker with a bit of cash could spread their ideas to thousands of people. It was chaotic. It led to the Reformation, decades of religious wars, and a total collapse of the shared "truth" of Europe.
Sound familiar?
Palmer argues that we are currently living through our own version of this. We are "inventing" our own new era, and just like the people of the 15th century, we are terrified of what the lack of centralized information control is doing to our society. By looking at how the Renaissance handled its information crisis, we might find some clues for our own survival.
- The Printing Press wasn't an instant win. It took a hundred years for society to develop the "filters" needed to figure out what was true and what was nonsense.
- Literacy didn't just mean reading. It meant learning how to navigate a world where anyone could claim to be an authority.
- The "Classics" were a shield. People used ancient Greek and Roman ideas as a way to talk about the present without getting arrested.
Why We Need the Myth
If the Renaissance was "invented," does that mean it's fake? Not necessarily. Palmer suggests that the idea of the Renaissance is a powerful tool for human progress. Even if the history is a bit of a stretch, the belief that humans can radically improve their world by looking back at the best of the past is a motivating force.
We need the Renaissance because it gives us a roadmap for change. It tells us that even in the midst of plague, war, and corruption—all of which were rampant in the 1400s—people can still create beautiful things and think new thoughts.
The danger is when we believe the "clean" version of the story. When we forget the struggle, the censorship, and the weirdness, we lose the actual lessons of history. We start to think that progress is inevitable or that it happens easily.
What Ada Palmer Teaches Us About the Future
Ada Palmer is a historian who also writes science fiction (the Terra Ignota series). This isn't a coincidence. To her, history is the study of how the "impossible" becomes "inevitable."
In her novels, she explores how the social structures we take for granted today—like nations or nuclear families—might look completely different in a few centuries. She uses her knowledge of how the Renaissance "invented" the modern world to imagine how we might "invent" the future.
It’s about agency. If the people of the Renaissance could consciously decide to revive ancient ideas to change their present, we can do the same. We aren't just passengers in history; we are the ones writing the marketing copy for the next era.
Reevaluating Your Own "Renaissance"
So, what does this mean for you? When you look at history, or even your own life, you’re usually looking at a curated narrative. You’re looking at an "invented" version of events designed to make sense of the chaos.
Ada Palmer’s work invites us to be more critical of those narratives. Don't just accept the "Great Man" theory of history where a few geniuses changed the world. Look at the printers, the smugglers of banned books, the translators, and the people who were desperately trying to make sense of a world that was moving too fast for them.
Actionable Insights for the History Obsessed
If you want to move beyond the textbook version of the Renaissance and see it through the lens of Palmer’s research, here is how to start:
- Stop looking for "The First." Don't look for the "first" scientist or the "first" modern person. Instead, look for the "splicing." Look for where an old medieval idea meets a new discovery and see the friction.
- Read the "Bad" Books. The Renaissance wasn't just Plato and Virgil. It was also full of bizarre guides on how to talk to angels, pseudoscientific alchemy, and political tracts that were objectively wrong. These tell you more about the period than the masterpieces do.
- Track the Information Flow. When you see a major change in history, look for the technology that carried the ideas. Who paid for the paper? Who distributed the books? Follow the money and the ink.
- Embrace the Mess. Accept that history is a series of contradictions. People can be brilliant artists and terrible human beings. They can be forward-thinking scientists and deeply superstitious. The "Renaissance Man" wasn't a perfect, balanced figure; he was a person trying to live in two different centuries at once.
The Renaissance wasn't a period you could have walked around in. You couldn't have asked a baker in Florence in 1450, "How's the Renaissance going?" and expected an answer. It’s a label we use to describe a specific kind of change. By understanding how we invented the Renaissance Ada Palmer helps us realize that we are currently inventing whatever comes next.
History isn't just back there; it's something we are actively making by deciding what parts of the past are worth keeping and what parts we should finally let go. Check out Palmer’s blog Exapologist or her lectures at the University of Chicago if you want to see this kind of deep-dive thinking in action. It’s a rabbit hole, but it’s one that actually leads somewhere useful.
To really get a grip on this, start by looking at any "period" of your own life you've neatly categorized. Ask yourself what you're leaving out to make that story work. Once you see the "invention" in your own history, you'll start seeing it everywhere in the world's history too.
Next Steps:
- Research the rediscovery of Lucretius in 1417 to see a real-world example of a "dangerous" book.
- Compare the 15th-century printing revolution with the early 2000s internet boom to see the patterns in information chaos.
- Read Ada Palmer’s essay "The Renaissance: What Most People Get Wrong" for a more academic breakdown of these themes.