AuthorTopic: Tribal Man  (Read 6491 times)

Offline Mush

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • MushSauce

Tribal Man

on: September 05, 2009, 06:07:02 pm
I made this for fun yesterday only to wake up and see how messed up some parts are (particularly the forehead). C+C would be nice.



Based on this quick sketch of mine:

« Last Edit: September 13, 2009, 02:41:35 am by Mush »

Offline Mush

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • MushSauce

Re: Face Portrait

Reply #1 on: September 06, 2009, 03:20:53 am
Update: decided to make a body for the head.



Used Andrew Loomis' anatomy book for reference.

Offline Seele07

  • 0001
  • *
  • Posts: 52
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

Re: Tribal Face Portrait (Now with Body!)

Reply #2 on: September 06, 2009, 05:23:39 am
Hey Mush  :) ,

Nice, but why such big Eyes?  ???

Or is that "normal" with Tribals? O_o

Oh, and: You have two dark shades in your Palette, that are almost the same - you can combine them to one, if you like :) .

Greetings,
Ingo
« Last Edit: September 06, 2009, 05:26:47 am by Seele07 »

Offline Gil

  • 0100
  • ***
  • Posts: 1543
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Too square to be hip
    • http://pixeljoint.com/p/475.htm
    • View Profile
    • My Portfolio

Re: Tribal Face Portrait (Now with Body!)

Reply #3 on: September 07, 2009, 12:31:50 pm
This seems to be an almost exact trace of Loomis' ideal male proportion chart in "Figure drawing for all it's worth". A reference is fine, but this seems to be more of a carbon copy.

I'd go for a smaller height, maybe 7 or even 6 heads. The head anatomy is so cartoony that the proportion doesn't seem to fit.

Offline Mush

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • MushSauce

Re: Tribal Man

Reply #4 on: September 13, 2009, 02:46:26 am
I do admit it was a direct copy of Loomis' figure, but it wasn't a trace (don't know if that makes any difference). I just wanted to get the anatomy correct before I change it up a bit.

Here's what I have now.
-----------------------------

Offline Koi Kami Mauro

  • 0001
  • *
  • Posts: 34
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

Re: Tribal Man

Reply #5 on: September 17, 2009, 02:22:57 am
I do admit it was a direct copy of Loomis' figure, but it wasn't a trace (don't know if that makes any difference). I just wanted to get the anatomy correct before I change it up a bit.

Here's what I have now.
-----------------------------



I know you referenced from an anatomy book, but I just feel the knees should be a tad higher...

Offline Gil

  • 0100
  • ***
  • Posts: 1543
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Too square to be hip
    • http://pixeljoint.com/p/475.htm
    • View Profile
    • My Portfolio

Re: Tribal Man

Reply #6 on: September 17, 2009, 04:57:12 pm
Nope, the knees are exactly right. That's the advantage he got from copying it, the proportions should be as good as it gets :)

Offline Helm

  • Moderator
  • 0110
  • *
  • Posts: 5159
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • Asides-Bsides

Re: Tribal Man

Reply #7 on: September 17, 2009, 05:04:30 pm
Actually I'd say the knees are low. Loomis isn't a great reference point.

Offline Pawige

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 293
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • The Noisy Sanctum

Re: Tribal Man

Reply #8 on: September 17, 2009, 05:20:39 pm
The knees here are definitely lower than Loomis' knees anyway. In my opinion, the head is way too small as well. He's approximately 8 1/4 heads tall, which is a bit much, I'd say.

Offline Mush

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • MushSauce

Re: Tribal Man

Reply #9 on: September 18, 2009, 12:32:49 am
Thanks for the replies.

Actually, his body is 6.9319 heads tall (610px/88px).
I might just scrap the whole body as it doesn't really add to the piece. It was good anatomy practice though.