AuthorTopic: low poly stuffs  (Read 18360 times)

Offline straypixels

  • 0001
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • SHAZAM!
    • View Profile

Re: low poly stuffs

Reply #10 on: November 02, 2008, 06:01:56 am
I'm sorry... I have to...


"I WANT A FRIGGIN' KOI WITH A FRIGGIN' LASER ON ITS FRIGGIN' CHIN! IS THAT SO MUCH TO ASK!?"

Really, really nice work. I agree with Squiggly that you need to sharpen up your textures, but it's really well done and you already know there's problems, so I'm not going to complain :D

Excellent work!
Straying since 1999

Offline TrevoriuS

  • 0011
  • **
  • Posts: 550
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Pixels... everywhere!!
    • View Profile

Re: low poly stuffs

Reply #11 on: November 02, 2008, 11:50:13 am
UV-space usage indeed is generally very bad. Because of the low amount of colours it should not be too hard to hide seams as long as UV-s are to scale with eachother. Therefore it should not be a problem for you to work out something to fit the textures into a square space much better.

Lovely models on the other hand :) Awesome Koi as stated many times before

Offline Conzeit

  • 0100
  • ***
  • Posts: 1448
  • Karma: +3/-0
  • Camus
    • conzeit
    • View Profile
    • CONZEIT

Re: low poly stuffs

Reply #12 on: November 02, 2008, 11:59:57 am
Well, they're odd sizes (normally a texture sheet follows th same basic 'powers of two' rule that old sprite-based 2D engines used, and for the same reasons), but I think mostly he was talking about the wasted space.  The textures as they appear on the models are sweet as hell, but the texture sheets probably wouldn't look that hot in a portfolio in their current state.

I see, so it is a problem of format...like I thought.

I dont know, I feel like he's got the nack of it and that problem seems like a matter of getting used to the tool, which will easily come from practice. I mean he does already know it's important so doesnt seem a reason to sweat it.


I never really thought 3d Modeling could be fun but this stuff is kinda warming me up to it.

 
Hey man make a video tutorial of how you do these....even if there's no special technique used...I think it could be good to watch you have fun modelling these
 Who knows maybe if you do I'll even end up so pumped from it I'll be rigging models....which from what I undesrtand is the most boring and hard part. The pure animation part sure is easy enough.

Funny that his pictures are bad at establishing depth and specially perspective, while he can do 3d so easily.
« Last Edit: November 02, 2008, 12:14:51 pm by Conceit »

Offline ndchristie

  • 0100
  • ***
  • Posts: 2426
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile

Re: low poly stuffs

Reply #13 on: November 04, 2008, 03:53:41 am
actually conciet i'm going to disagree.  there is a LOT to learn about uv mapping when it comes to working with the proper sized square, working with polys in that square, and working with texels in that square as well.  it's not something that comes easy with practice if you're doing five in a row with the same galring issues. these are pretty low-poly and low-color, which is a great place to learn, but using a third of a 100x100 map is a bit like shooting kittens with a rocket lanucher sideways :P

that said, the models themselves are very nice  :y: :y: :y: :y:.  I assume they are rigged as well?
« Last Edit: November 04, 2008, 03:57:42 am by ndchristie »
A mistake is a mistake.
The same mistake twice is a bad habit.
The same mistake three or more times is a motif.

Offline Xion

  • 0100
  • ***
  • Posts: 1551
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • FourbitFriday

Re: low poly stuffs

Reply #14 on: November 04, 2008, 07:18:24 am
using a third of a 100x100 map is a bit like shooting kittens with a rocket lanucher sideways :P
What does that even mean! ???

Offline ndchristie

  • 0100
  • ***
  • Posts: 2426
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile

Re: low poly stuffs

Reply #15 on: November 04, 2008, 11:39:17 am
using a third of a 100x100 map is a bit like shooting kittens with a rocket lanucher sideways :P
What does that even mean! ???

kittens : the samus shouldn't be too hard to unwrap compared to more complex forms
rocket launcher : the map is very big compared to the result (64x64 would be perfect i think)
sideways : the size is not only large, but unusable, and two-thirds of it are wasted, making it awkward.

sounds a bit meaner than I meant it to when i spell it out like that >.<
A mistake is a mistake.
The same mistake twice is a bad habit.
The same mistake three or more times is a motif.

Offline Jad

  • 0100
  • ***
  • Posts: 1048
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

Re: low poly stuffs

Reply #16 on: November 04, 2008, 11:48:52 am

I don't really know how to texture properly, some pointers would be nice.


ndchristie: I don't think it sounds too harsh considering the above  ;D
' _ '

Offline Jakten

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 250
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • The Bionic Vapor Boy
    • View Profile
    • Levitating Rocksquatch

Re: low poly stuffs

Reply #17 on: November 04, 2008, 01:50:31 pm
Textures are usually sized in multiples of 8 I think it was. Otherwise it causes some kinds of problems that I have yet to encounter. UVing is hell, it's so difficult to unwrap a model and have no weird deformations on the textures while keeping everything within a small square and have minimal visible seams. High poly stuff is the worst, its like doing a puzzle with no pieces that fit together. If you use maya I found a nice tool which lets your snap UVs to pixels which makes it easier when doing stuff like this though I'm sure other programs probably have something similar. I think you could probably rearrange these texture easily though or seperate them into 2 smaller files to save wasted space.

These are incredible though, you managed to do the textures really well though despite the large empty spaces. Do you have any images of the wires? Also have you rigged them at all? I'd love to see some of them in motion.

Offline Xeno-Striker

  • 0001
  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • My Tumblr

Re: low poly stuffs

Reply #18 on: November 04, 2008, 08:55:17 pm
Also have you rigged them at all? I'd love to see some of them in motion.

my files are on another computer so the wire frames will have to wait. As for little animations, I'm not that good at it yet, but I'll give it a try  ;D

Offline Conzeit

  • 0100
  • ***
  • Posts: 1448
  • Karma: +3/-0
  • Camus
    • conzeit
    • View Profile
    • CONZEIT

Re: low poly stuffs

Reply #19 on: November 05, 2008, 03:20:13 am
sounds a bit meaner than I meant it to when i spell it out like that >.<

I found it to be a fun and clear exageration.

Thought and consideration are useful in some situations but worrying is just consideration with a tinge of fear, which is just wasteful. So I talked about something I knew nothing about simply to try to drive that fear away.

I can see now that it must be a very frustrating thing to be devoted to and it takes tweaking like hell.

Now I feel like asking a question.
Has anybody here ever found UVing fun?