AuthorTopic: Love  (Read 9094 times)

Offline Neoriceisgood

  • 0001
  • *
  • Posts: 57
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

Love

on: December 11, 2006, 01:22:35 am
This piece needs no explanation, c&c welcome.

Offline AlienQuark

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 146
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • be triangular
    • View Profile

Re: Love

Reply #1 on: December 11, 2006, 01:30:48 am
This piece needs no explanation...

I beg to differ. :-\ .

Offline halu

  • 0001
  • *
  • Posts: 80
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • wtf :D
    • View Profile

Re: Love

Reply #2 on: December 11, 2006, 01:38:57 am
I think maybe he loves Gorillas ????
I can't really focus on it long enough to criticize, so...

Offline Stwelin

  • 0011
  • **
  • Posts: 567
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

Re: Love

Reply #3 on: December 11, 2006, 01:41:40 am
i'll critique as soon as the seizures stop.

Offline halu

  • 0001
  • *
  • Posts: 80
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • wtf :D
    • View Profile

Re: Love

Reply #4 on: December 11, 2006, 01:58:33 am
alright, after copying the first frame, I can sort of critique it.
the grass looks bad with the dithering, it looks very grainy, same for the moon(?).

Offline Rydin

  • 0011
  • **
  • Posts: 925
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • ...zzzt...
    • @thickDumps
    • View Profile
    • thickDumps

Re: Love

Reply #5 on: December 11, 2006, 04:38:54 am
It's cool, but extremely hard to make out.  I'd say right off the bat, stick to one outline color...and maybe outline more of the arms and head to make it more defined.  Also, the dithering on the wall and the light source in the sky could use some work...they don't seem to be helping that much at the moment.
I would say that the second frame is working against you... instead of having him be in the exact pose as the first frame, maybe make the arms be at a 45 degree angle, between the pose of the first and last frame...  The definition from the first frame is definitely not carried over to the second frame, and depending on what your going for, it may be alright for the second frame to be this way, but it'd definitely be in your best interest to re-shade and re-outline the gorilla in the last frame.

This is pretty snazzy (though seizure inducing at the moment), and I think with a little work, will be tolerable to even the toughest critiques.
Man cannot remake himself without suffering for he is both the marble and the sculptor.

Offline big brother

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 341
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • herculeanpixel.com
    • View Profile
    • Portfolio Site

Re: Love

Reply #6 on: December 11, 2006, 04:07:30 pm
I've seen a non color cycling version of this before. Something done in MS Paint with the default colors. Can't remember who pixelled it originally.

Offline Neoriceisgood

  • 0001
  • *
  • Posts: 57
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

Re: Love

Reply #7 on: December 11, 2006, 05:46:00 pm
I've seen a non color cycling version of this before. Something done in MS Paint with the default colors. Can't remember who pixelled it originally.

Try Neoriceisgood.

Offline Larwick

  • 0011
  • **
  • Posts: 738
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • Larwick
    • http://www.pixeljoint.com/p/3794.htm
    • View Profile
    • Artstation

Re: Love

Reply #8 on: December 11, 2006, 11:36:41 pm
Try Neoriceisgood.

Why did you have to post it with this horrible animation and colours?

Offline Neoriceisgood

  • 0001
  • *
  • Posts: 57
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

Re: Love

Reply #9 on: December 12, 2006, 09:07:43 pm
Why did you have to post it with this horrible animation and colours?

Try to stay constructive please, obviously I have an underlying message in my piece that things can "hurt to look at" and "hurt to look at"

I am sorry if you can not appreciate the depth of my piece.

Quote
I would say that the second frame is working against you... instead of having him be in the exact pose as the first frame, maybe make the arms be at a 45 degree angle, between the pose of the first and last frame...  The definition from the first frame is definitely not carried over to the second frame

Good idea thanks.

Quote
but it'd definitely be in your best interest to re-shade and re-outline the gorilla in the last frame.

No need, I wrote "Gorilla" at the bottom to make it obvious what it is.