Again, thanks to everyone for taking the time to respond.
Xion NightSee below.ZachYeah, he was supposed to be floating.
crab2selout.pngSee below.LarwickI think you're right on the money about originality, but I wouldn't limit it to any one thing.
Andy TranEveryone's entitled to their opinion on the sucktitude of my art.
reydragkSee below.AdariasSee below.CamusA special thanks for voicing your opinion so clearly.
Now about those damn "tentacles." The first ones were representative of the creature being underwater and they were just floating there. They're swirly and dainty, and I suppose good fun to look at. My major concern with them is that I've already done many things that have fanciful swirls that are entirely pointless. They're oldhat by now. I like to change it up a bit if at all possible.
The second set of "tentacles" are really supposed to be legs. As for fitting the anatomy, I don't see how you've drawn that conclusion. They do indeed vary in width, and they would make for some shoddy tentacles. They're not tentacles though. They aren't supposed to relate any sort of perspective either. The three in the back are supposed to be further away, but that's it.
As for your suggestions, I'll be honest and say I probably won't take any into account. I'm familiar with the sprite you posted, and that makes sense if the case were tentacles. I can give a little reference into my train of thought if you have a look at this
screenshot from MGS4. I understand that a lot of people don't like the new set of legs, but I do. So nyah!
Though, I am not a heartless person and so I'll painstakingly finish
two (!) variations of the creature. The one on the left is for everyone, while the one on the right is for me.
DhaosYeah, I may have to change them around a bit. They're supposed to evoke a "ready" stance (like those taken by baseball or volleyball players), but people tend to see it as just unbalanced. I think it looks balanced...