Pixelation

Critique => Pixel Art => Topic started by: BadMoodTaylor on August 23, 2016, 04:10:07 pm

Title: Simple Windmill
Post by: BadMoodTaylor on August 23, 2016, 04:10:07 pm
(http://loubagel.com/archives/2016/August/windmill.png)

Any feedback appreciated
Title: Re: Simple Windmill
Post by: spO_oks on August 25, 2016, 10:50:59 am
Looks good! Could maybe up the contrast between the 3 different windmill colours.  The colour choices feel a bit dull too, but it still looks nice.
Title: Re: Simple Windmill
Post by: BadMoodTaylor on August 26, 2016, 12:25:13 am
Re-did the colors and first attempt at animating (not sure how to avoid it transforming/deforming at different angles)

(http://LouBagel.com/archives/2016/August/windmill.gif)
Title: Re: Simple Windmill
Post by: MysteryMeat on August 26, 2016, 03:22:42 am
(not sure how to avoid it transforming/deforming at different angles)

(http://LouBagel.com/archives/2016/August/windmill.gif)
Unfortunately not much choice but to redraw them frame by frame.
Title: Re: Simple Windmill
Post by: BadMoodTaylor on August 26, 2016, 05:11:58 am
(not sure how to avoid it transforming/deforming at different angles)

(http://LouBagel.com/archives/2016/August/windmill.gif)
Unfortunately not much choice but to redraw them frame by frame.

I did redraw the windmill each frame. I'm talking about 1 pixel width horizontal looks thicker than 1 pixel width diagonal
Title: Re: Simple Windmill
Post by: questseeker on August 26, 2016, 07:47:05 am
Title: Re: Simple Windmill
Post by: BadMoodTaylor on August 26, 2016, 11:35:09 am
Wow, thanks for all the comments—so many on such a little piece.

Let me respond one by one but first mention that the animation was an afterthought.  I wasn't sure if it would animate well but tried for practice and to see if it could:

Thanks again for the comments.  Don't think that any disagreement above means I don't appreciate your time to comment.



(http://loubagel.com/archives/2016/August/windmill2.gif)
(https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/x/old-dutch-windmill-10772969.jpg)
Title: Re: Simple Windmill
Post by: BadMoodTaylor on August 26, 2016, 11:41:49 am
Another edit to take away all of the bulk on the back of the sails.  Still deforms but attracts less attention IMO.  Maybe try an edit on the to stop the front from deforming as much?

(http://loubagel.com/archives/2016/August/windmill3.gif)
Title: Re: Simple Windmill
Post by: BadMoodTaylor on August 26, 2016, 11:44:25 am
  • The windmill body shouldn't be a cone...

Also, I think I like it as cone because it reminds me of the honeycomb from Mario 3  ;D
Title: Re: Simple Windmill
Post by: questseeker on August 31, 2016, 07:00:40 am
Regarding your reference photograph, it shows frames without sails because it isn't operational. If the windmill spins, it should have sails.
For example, no further than Wikipedia, a Dutch-style "smock mill" of the sort I had in mind https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windmill#/media/File:Goliath_Poldermolen.jpg (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windmill#/media/File:Goliath_Poldermolen.jpg) and a tower-like one, more similar to your reference https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maud_Foster_Windmill#/media/File:Skirbeck,_Boston,_Maud_Foster_Mill.jpg (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maud_Foster_Windmill#/media/File:Skirbeck,_Boston,_Maud_Foster_Mill.jpg)
Title: Re: Simple Windmill
Post by: BadMoodTaylor on August 31, 2016, 11:42:34 am
Regarding your reference photograph, it shows frames without sails because it isn't operational. If the windmill spins, it should have sails.
For example, no further than Wikipedia, a Dutch-style "smock mill" of the sort I had in mind https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windmill#/media/File:Goliath_Poldermolen.jpg (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windmill#/media/File:Goliath_Poldermolen.jpg) and a tower-like one, more similar to your reference https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maud_Foster_Windmill#/media/File:Skirbeck,_Boston,_Maud_Foster_Mill.jpg (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maud_Foster_Windmill#/media/File:Skirbeck,_Boston,_Maud_Foster_Mill.jpg)

I'm confused—my reference photo doesn't have frames, it is a still image. And what part of the photos do you want me to look at or the point you are trying to make?
Title: Re: Simple Windmill
Post by: eishiya on August 31, 2016, 02:21:01 pm
questseeker is talking about the latticed frames of the spinny part of the windmill, not animation frames. An active mill with sails like that would have some sort of material stretched over those frames to allow them to catch wind (example (http://jamestownhistoricalsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/windmill-full-sail-650x300.jpg)). Yours just has the bare frames, and would not be able to catch much wind.
Title: Re: Simple Windmill
Post by: BadMoodTaylor on August 31, 2016, 03:06:13 pm
questseeker is talking about the latticed frames of the spinny part of the windmill, not animation frames. An active mill with sails like that would have some sort of material stretched over those frames to allow them to catch wind (example (http://jamestownhistoricalsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/windmill-full-sail-650x300.jpg)). Yours just has the bare frames, and would not be able to catch much wind.

Ah okay I get it. So my original drawing was fine but once animated I would need to add the sails. Guess my knowledge of windmill anatomy isn't up to par.

Find it kind of funny that I was hoping to practice color choice and end up learning about windmills.