Pixelation

Critique => Pixel Art => Topic started by: josemwarrior on May 07, 2016, 04:22:05 pm

Title: [C+C] Pixel for fun
Post by: josemwarrior on May 07, 2016, 04:22:05 pm
(http://pixeljoint.com/files/icons/full/work01_original1.png)

How could I improve this? technique, color, shape....

Update 2:

I follow the odedrt9's image:

(http://pixeljoint.com/files/icons/full/work01_original1.png)(http://i.imgur.com/DcrWpeK.png)

Can anyone get more out of this?
Thanks in advance!
Title: Re: [C+C] Pixel for fun
Post by: MysteryMeat on May 08, 2016, 12:07:31 am
not a whole lot of shading going on on his breastplate, should be some lighting there from the staff as it's currently positioned.
Title: Re: [C+C] Pixel for fun
Post by: odedrt9 on May 08, 2016, 04:07:08 am
I might have gone horribly wrong or overboard with it, but there is too much light for that small amount of shading:
(http://i.imgur.com/aizRrfV.png)
Title: Re: [C+C] Pixel for fun
Post by: wzl on May 08, 2016, 09:25:02 am
The silhouette is really cool.
For the armor design you seem to fall into the same trap i always do. that being
Quote
how the hell does a piece of armor even look

There's tons of ways to do it, and since you're going for a more robo scifi fantasy mix you even have more freedom. Though right now all your arm, leg and torso armor does is being round blobs.
I'd love to see more detail and thought put into it!
Title: Re: [C+C] Pixel for fun
Post by: josemwarrior on May 09, 2016, 09:51:09 pm
Update 2:

I follow the odedrt9's image:

(http://pixeljoint.com/files/icons/full/work01_original1.png)(http://i.imgur.com/DcrWpeK.png)

Can anyone get more out of this?
Thanks in advance!


@MysteryMeat

I could not understand your message because of my low level of English.
Thanks in any case to answer. Could you rewrite with simpler words?? Thanks!!

@odedrt9

(http://i.imgur.com/aizRrfV.png)

Wow! Now it is a totally shining armor


@wzl

yeah!, is an advantage invent a world, rather than mimic a realistic style. I think I could bring to life new characters. Because add new details to this I think is more complicated