You’ve seen them. Those stark, grey-scale shots that look like they were taken in a dusty gravel pit at 3 AM. Images of the surface of the moon have a way of feeling both deeply familiar and totally alien at the exact same time. It’s funny because we’ve been looking at this big rock in the sky for millennia, but it wasn't until the Soviet Luna 3 probe swung around the back side in 1959 that we actually saw what the "far side" looked like. Spoiler alert: it’s way more cratered and rugged than the face we see every night.
Actually, the moon is kind of a mess.
If you look at the famous Apollo-era photography, specifically the stuff shot on 70mm Hasselblad cameras, you notice something weird right away. The shadows are pitch black. I mean, totally void of light. On Earth, the atmosphere scatters sunlight, so even in the shade, you can see your feet. On the moon? No air. No scattering. If you’re standing in a shadow, you’re basically in a localized abyss. This high-contrast reality is why so many people—the skeptics and the hobbyists alike—obsess over these photos. They don't look "natural" to our Earth-bound eyes.
The grainy reality of lunar photography
Taking a photo on the moon is a nightmare. It really is. Think about the temperature swings. We’re talking about a range from 120°C in the sun to -130°C in the shade. Standard film would just melt or become brittle and snap like a cracker. The engineers had to strip the leather coverings off the cameras and use special thin-base Kodak film just to fit enough frames into the magazines.
When you look at modern images of the surface of the moon from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), the detail is almost uncomfortable. You can see the actual tracks left by the Lunar Roving Vehicle from the 1970s. Those tracks haven't moved. There’s no wind to blow them away. They just sit there, frozen in a vacuum, which makes the moon feel like a giant, dusty museum.
Wait, let's talk about the color for a second. Everyone thinks the moon is grey. It sort of is, but it’s more of a "brownish-grey." Geologists like Harrison "Jack" Schmitt, the only scientist to actually walk on the moon during Apollo 17, famously found "orange soil" at Shorty Crater. He was genuinely excited, yelling back to Houston about it. It turned out to be tiny beads of volcanic glass. So, when you see a lunar photo that looks a bit colorful, don't assume it's photoshopped. The geology there is actually pretty diverse if you know where to look.
Why the "Man in the Moon" is just a bunch of lava
Those big dark spots? They aren't shadows or oceans. They’re called "maria," which is Latin for seas. Early astronomers thought they were water. They’re actually massive plains of basaltic lava that flowed into giant impact basins billions of years ago.
🔗 Read more: Why a 9 digit zip lookup actually saves you money (and headaches)
When you see a close-up image of a mare, it’s surprisingly smooth compared to the "highlands." The highlands are the lighter, heavily cratered areas. Because the maria are younger (relatively speaking), they haven't been pelted by as many space rocks yet. It’s basically a cosmic timeline written in rock.
Digital vs. Analog: The new era of moon shots
We’re currently in a bit of a lunar photography renaissance. Between India’s Chandrayaan-3, Japan’s SLIM, and NASA’s LRO, we are getting terabytes of data. But the vibe has changed. Apollo photos were about "being there." Modern images of the surface of the moon are about "measuring things."
Multispectral imaging is the big deal now. Instead of just taking a "pretty picture," cameras like the ones on the LRO use different wavelengths to identify minerals.
- Titanium-rich areas show up in specific UV filters.
- Water ice (mostly at the poles) is hunted using laser altimeters and neutron detectors.
- Topographic maps are now so precise we can plan landings within a few meters of a target.
Kinda cool, right? But it lacks that "human touch" of a blurry astronaut selfie. There's something about the grainy, slightly overexposed shots from the 60s that feels more real than the 4K digital renders we get today.
The problem with the "Earthrise" photo
You know the one. William Anders took it during Apollo 8. It’s arguably the most famous image of the surface of the moon and Earth combined. But here’s a fun fact: it wasn't planned. The crew was busy doing orbit checks, and suddenly the Earth popped up over the horizon. Anders scrambled for his camera. He actually missed the first shot because he had black-and-white film loaded. He had to yell at Jim Lovell to find a color magazine.
That photo changed everything. It showed the moon as this dead, colorless desert and the Earth as this fragile, glowing marble. It’s why we care about lunar photography in the first place. It’s not about the moon; it’s about the perspective.
💡 You might also like: Why the time on Fitbit is wrong and how to actually fix it
What's actually on the ground?
If you were to stand on the surface and point a camera at your feet, you’d see "regolith." Don't call it dirt. Dirt has organic matter; regolith is just pulverized rock and glass shards created by millions of years of meteorite impacts.
It’s incredibly abrasive. It smells like spent gunpowder—according to every astronaut who breathed the dust back in the Lunar Module. In photos, it looks soft, almost like powdered sugar. In reality, it’s like microscopic shards of glass that chew through spacesuit fabric and clog up camera seals.
Seeing the moon yourself (The Prosumer way)
You don't need a billion-dollar probe to get great images of the surface of the moon. Honestly, most modern mirrorless cameras with a 600mm lens can capture the Tycho crater clearly.
If you’re trying to take your own shots, here’s the trick: the moon is much brighter than you think. It’s basically a giant rock in full sunlight. If you use "Auto" mode, your camera will try to brighten the black sky and blow out the moon into a white blob. You have to underexpose. Treat it like a sunny day at the beach, even though it’s night.
- Use a tripod. No brainer.
- Set your ISO low (100 or 200).
- Use a fast shutter speed. The moon is actually moving pretty quick across the sky.
- Focus manually. Autofocus usually freaks out on the moon's limb.
The best time for photos isn't actually a full moon. It’s a quarter moon. Why? The "terminator line"—the line between light and dark. That’s where the shadows are longest, and that’s where you see the mountain peaks and crater rims popping out in 3D. A full moon looks flat and boring because the sun is hitting it head-on.
The future: Artemis and beyond
NASA’s Artemis program is going to give us something we’ve never had: high-definition video from the lunar south pole. This area is tricky. The sun sits right on the horizon, creating incredibly long, creepy shadows.
📖 Related: Why Backgrounds Blue and Black are Taking Over Our Digital Screens
We’re also going to see "Earthlight" photography. Just like the moon lights up our nights, the Earth lights up the lunar night. Except the Earth is much bigger and more reflective. An "Earthlit" lunar landscape would look eerie—a dim, blue-tinted world.
Researchers are currently working on cameras that can handle the extreme radiation and the "darkness" of the permanently shadowed regions (PSRs). These are craters at the poles that haven't seen sunlight in billions of years. We think there’s water ice there. To get images of those surfaces, we have to use "long-exposure" photon-counting cameras that can see in near-total darkness.
Actionable Insights for Moon Enthusiasts
If you want to dive deeper into the world of lunar imagery, stop looking at "Best of" galleries. They’re repetitive.
- Visit the LROC Quickmap: This is a web-based tool from Arizona State University. You can zoom in on almost any square inch of the moon. You can see the Apollo descent stages, the tracks of the Lunokhod rovers, and even fresh impact craters that happened just a few years ago.
- Check the "March to the Moon" archive: This is a high-resolution scan of the original Apollo film. It hasn't been "cleaned up" or "beautified" for magazines. It shows the raw, gritty reality of what the astronauts saw.
- Learn the shadows: If you're identifying craters, look at the shadow direction. It tells you the time of day on the moon. Since a "day" on the moon lasts about 29 Earth days, the shadows crawl with agonizing slowness.
The moon isn't just a dead rock. It's a high-definition record of the solar system's history. Every crater is an entry in a diary. By studying these images, we aren't just looking at a distant object—we're looking at the neighborhood we live in.
To get started with your own lunar observations, download an app like "Lunascope" or use a desktop tool like "Virtual Moon Atlas." They help you identify exactly what you’re looking at through your telescope or in your photos. Once you start recognizing the Sea of Tranquility or the Apennine Mountains, the moon stops being a white circle and starts being a place. A real, physical, dusty place.
Next Steps:
Go to the NASA Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) gallery. Instead of looking at the famous shots, search for "oblique views." These are photos taken at an angle rather than straight down. They give you a much better sense of the terrifying scale of lunar mountains, some of which are taller than any peak on Earth.