Mars isn’t actually red. Well, it is, but it also isn't. If you sat on the edge of Gale Crater and looked out, you wouldn't see the vibrant, neon-orange landscapes that pop up in your Instagram feed or in Ridley Scott movies. You’d probably see something closer to a dusty, brownish-tan job site in the middle of the Arizona desert.
It's weird.
We've been obsessed with images of the surface of Mars since Mariner 4 sent back those first grainy, black-and-white digital snapshots in 1965. Back then, people were just relieved it wasn't covered in canals or bustling Martian cities. Today, we have high-resolution, 360-degree panoramas that make you feel like you’re standing right next to the Perseverance rover. But there is a huge gap between what the rover "sees" and what NASA shows us.
Understanding these images requires unlearning a bit of how we think photography works. On Earth, we have a thick atmosphere that scatters blue light. On Mars, the air is thin, carbon-dioxide heavy, and perpetually filled with suspended dust. This dust is rich in iron oxide—basically rust. That rust absorbs blue light and reflects red, which gives the Martian sky a pinkish-butterscotch tint. It’s the literal opposite of Earth.
Why the Colors in Images of the Surface of Mars Keep Changing
Have you ever noticed how some photos of Mars look like a dull brown rock, while others look like a bright, Technicolor dream? That isn't a mistake. It's intentional.
NASA uses different "color products" depending on what a scientist is trying to study.
The first is True Color. This is the "best guess" at what a human eye would see. It’s often a bit muddy and low-contrast. Honestly, it’s kind of depressing to look at for long periods. Then there is Raw Color, which is exactly what the CCD sensor on the camera captured before any processing. Since the cameras on Curiosity or Perseverance aren't built like your iPhone, these raw shots often have a weird green or blue cast.
Then we get to the big one: False Color (or Enhanced Color).
Scientists use this to make different minerals pop. If a geologist is looking for hematite or clay minerals, they’ll crank the saturation or shift the color channels. It makes the rocks look blue or purple. It isn't "fake" in the sense that they're lying to you; it's more like using a highlighter on a textbook. They want to see the "veins" in the rock that might indicate where water used to flow.
✨ Don't miss: New DeWalt 20V Tools: What Most People Get Wrong
The White Balance Problem
Calibration targets are the unsung heroes of Mars photography. Every rover carries a small sundial-like device called a CalTarget. It has discrete blocks of color—red, coal, blue, and green—that have known properties. By taking a picture of this target on Mars, engineers can "white balance" the images.
But here’s the kicker: they often white balance the images to look like they are under Earth-like lighting.
Why? Because geologists spent their whole lives learning to identify rocks under a blue sky. If you show them a rock under a Martian butterscotch sky, they might misidentify the mineral. By "correcting" the light to look like a sunny day in California, the scientists can work faster. So, when you see those crisp images of the surface of Mars where the sky looks a bit bluish-grey, you’re actually looking at a photo that has been digitally "transported" to Earth's lighting conditions.
The Cameras Doing the Heavy Lifting
We aren't just using one "camera." That’s a massive oversimplification.
Perseverance alone has 23 eyes. The most famous is Mastcam-Z. This is the one that gives us those sweeping, high-def panoramas. It has zoom capabilities that can see a housefly from the length of a football field. It’s powerful.
Then you have the WATSON camera. It’s tucked away on the end of the rover’s robotic arm. Its job is to get up close and personal—microscopic, really—with rock textures. When you see a photo of Mars that looks like a close-up of a piece of dried fruit, that’s WATSON. It’s looking for "biosignatures," those tiny patterns that suggest life might have once hunkered down in the damp soil billions of years ago.
Don't forget the HiRISE camera on the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO).
While the rovers are on the ground, HiRISE is 180 miles up. It is so powerful it can see the tracks the rovers leave in the dust. It captures "spiders" on Mars (seasonal carbon dioxide eruptions) and massive dust devils that look like ghostly snakes crawling across the plains. These overhead images of the surface of Mars provide the context that the ground-level shots lack. They show us that Mars is a world in motion, not a dead rock.
🔗 Read more: Memphis Doppler Weather Radar: Why Your App is Lying to You During Severe Storms
What the "Blue Sunset" Tells Us About Physics
One of the most viral images ever captured on the Red Planet is the blue sunset. It feels wrong. On Earth, we have blue skies and red sunsets. On Mars, it's the inverse.
This happens because of Mie Scattering.
The dust particles in the Martian atmosphere are just the right size to allow blue light to penetrate the atmosphere more efficiently than longer-wavelength red light. When the sun is low on the horizon, the light has to pass through more dust. The blue light is steered toward the observer, while the red light is scattered away.
It’s a haunting sight. If you were standing there, the sun would look smaller than it does on Earth—about two-thirds the size—and it would be surrounded by a pale blue halo. Seeing that for the first time in a high-res image changed how we perceive the planet. It stopped being a "place over there" and started being a "world."
Common Misconceptions and the "Face on Mars" Legacy
We can't talk about Mars photos without talking about Pareidolia. That’s the human tendency to see familiar shapes in random patterns.
The "Face on Mars" from the 1976 Viking 1 mission is the gold standard here. In low-res, grainy footage, a mesa in the Cydonia region looked exactly like a human face. People lost their minds. It was proof of an ancient civilization!
Then we went back.
In 2001, the Mars Global Surveyor took a high-res shot of the same spot. With better lighting and higher pixel density, the "face" turned out to be... a big, crumbly rock. Just a normal hill. We've seen "donuts," "thongs," "bigfoot," and "spoons" in images of the surface of Mars. Every single time, it’s just a weirdly eroded piece of sedimentary rock. Mars is a master of the optical illusion because its landscape is so alien yet so hauntingly familiar.
💡 You might also like: LG UltraGear OLED 27GX700A: The 480Hz Speed King That Actually Makes Sense
The Scale is Deceiving
It's really hard to tell how big things are on Mars. There are no trees. No houses. No squirrels.
When you look at an image of a Martian dune, it might be six inches tall, or it might be sixty feet tall. NASA usually has to include a "scale bar" or find a rock they've named (like "Barnacle Bill" or "Yogi") to give some perspective. Without the rover’s wheel or a robotic arm in the frame, your brain has no way to process the vastness.
The Future: Moving From Photos to Video
We are entering the era of Martian cinema. For decades, we only had "stop-motion" animations—stitching together individual photos to create a sense of movement.
That changed with the Perseverance landing.
For the first time, we had ruggedized cameras capturing full-motion video of the parachute deployment and the "Skycrane" maneuver. We saw the dust being kicked up by the rockets in real-time. Then came Ingenuity, the little helicopter that could. The footage of a man-made craft flying through the thin Martian air was a watershed moment for space exploration.
We aren't just looking at snapshots anymore. We are watching a planet live.
How to Find the Best "Real" Images
If you want to see the latest images of the surface of Mars without the "Instagram filter" of social media, you have to go to the source.
- The Raw Image Galleries: NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) hosts raw data feeds. You can see photos minutes after they hit the Deep Space Network. They are unprocessed, black and white, and full of "noise," but they are the realest look you'll get.
- The HiRISE Catalog: Run by the University of Arizona, this is where the "big" art lives. These are the massive, multi-gigabyte files showing avalanches, shifting dunes, and polar ice caps.
- Amateur Processors: There is a whole community of "space image processors" like Kevin Gill or Seán Doran. These people take the raw NASA data and turn them into cinematic masterpieces that often look better than the official releases.
What to Do With This Information
Looking at Mars isn't just about pretty pictures. It’s about building a mental map of a place humans might actually walk on in the next few decades.
- Check the timestamp: When you see an image, look for the "Sol" number. A Sol is a Martian day (about 24 hours and 39 minutes). This tells you how long the rover has been there.
- Look for the shadows: Shadows on Mars are incredibly sharp because there isn't much atmospheric scattering. If a photo looks "soft," it’s likely a heavy edit or a very dusty day.
- Identify the mission: Curiosity is in Gale Crater (lots of sedimentary layers). Perseverance is in Jezero Crater (an ancient river delta). The landscapes look different because their geologic histories are different.
The next time you scroll past a gallery of images of the surface of Mars, stop and look at the rocks. That dust you’re seeing is billions of years old. It hasn't been moved by water or wind in eons. You aren't just looking at a desert; you’re looking at a time capsule.
To get started on your own deep dive, head over to the NASA Mars Exploration Program website and filter by "Raw Images." Pick a Sol, any Sol, and see what the rovers saw that morning. It’s the closest thing we have to actual time travel.