You’ve probably seen the posters while driving through rural Punjab or scrolling through a heated Twitter thread. Sometimes it’s a grainy black-and-white shot on the back of a tractor-trailer. Other times, it’s a high-definition, stylized digital painting in a diaspora living room in Brampton or Southall. Images of Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale aren't just historical artifacts. Honestly, they’ve become one of the most polarizing visual symbols in modern Indian history.
For some, seeing that face—with the traditional round turban and the arrow in hand—evokes a sense of religious revival and "Shaheedi" (martyrdom). To others, it’s a jarring reminder of a decade of militancy that tore through the fabric of Northwest India. It’s kinda wild how a single photograph can mean "savior" to one person and "insurgent" to the next, but that’s the reality of the 1984 legacy.
The Visual Identity of a Movement
Back in the late 70s, Bhindranwale wasn't the global icon he is today. He was the head of the Damdami Taksal, a traditional Sikh educational institute. Early photographs show him mostly in religious settings. You’ll see him sitting cross-legged, surrounded by students, or leading Amrit Parchar (baptism) ceremonies. These images capture a specific goal: his mission to pull Sikh youth away from the drug epidemic and back toward the Khalsa path.
Then things shifted.
As the political heat rose between the Akali Dal, the Congress party, and the central government, the "look" changed. Photographs started featuring him with a holstered revolver or flanked by armed followers. This transition from a traveling preacher to a defiant political figure was captured by photojournalists like Raghu Rai. Rai’s work is particularly famous because he caught the intensity in Bhindranwale’s eyes—a gaze that many followers describe as "hypnotic" and critics call "menacing."
The most famous shots usually feature him at the Akal Takht. He’s often leaning against a bolster, holding a traditional teer (arrow), similar to the imagery of the tenth Guru, Guru Gobind Singh Ji. This wasn't accidental. It was a visual claim to a lineage of "Saint-Soldiers."
🔗 Read more: When is the Next Hurricane Coming 2024: What Most People Get Wrong
Why a Photo Can Get You Arrested (Or Hailed)
It’s 2026, and yet, the display of these images still makes headlines. Just a few months ago, there were reports of police in certain states asking tourists to remove Bhindranwale stickers from their cars. Why? Because in the eyes of the state, these images are often viewed as "pro-Khalistan" propaganda.
But talk to a young guy in a village near Moga, and he’ll tell you something different. For him, that photo represents a man who stood up to a government that he felt was overreaching. It represents the 1984 Operation Blue Star, where the Indian Army entered the Golden Temple complex. Whether you think he was a militant who fortified a shrine or a martyr who defended it, the image serves as a visual shorthand for that entire trauma.
Basically, the photo has become a "borderline" symbol. It sits right on the edge of what is legally permissible and what is considered a threat to national security.
The Commercialization of "Sant Ji"
Have you walked through the bazaars near the Harmandir Sahib lately? It’s a trip. You can find:
- Gold-embossed portraits on heavy canvas.
- T-shirts with stylized, Che Guevara-style stencils of his face.
- Small acrylic stands for car dashboards.
- Keychains and phone cases.
This "bazaar economy" has turned historical figures into a brand of sorts. Sociologists call this the commodification of dissent. When you buy a shirt with his face on it, you’re often signaling an identity—a "Panthic" pride—more than you are endorsing a specific political platform. It’s a way for the diaspora, especially, to stay connected to a history they didn't live through but feel deeply.
💡 You might also like: What Really Happened With Trump Revoking Mayorkas Secret Service Protection
What Most People Get Wrong About the Archival Photos
There’s a common misconception that all images of Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale were taken by government spies or hostile media. Not true. Many of the most intimate shots were taken by Sikh followers or independent journalists like Shekhar Gupta and Mark Tully who had direct access to him in the Golden Temple.
There are even photos of his body after the operation ended in June 1984. These are incredibly controversial. The government released them to prove he was gone, but for many Sikhs, those images only solidified his status as a "Shaheed." They became the final proof of a sacrifice.
Spotting the Real vs. The Edited
Lately, there’s been a surge in AI-generated or heavily "beautified" versions of his photos.
- The Realistic Edits: These sharpen the old 35mm film shots, making them look like they were taken yesterday.
- The Digital Paintings: These often add celestial light or dramatic backgrounds that weren't in the original scene.
- The "Warrior" Filter: Modern artists often emphasize the weapons and the armor more than the original photos did.
If you’re looking for historical accuracy, look for the grainy, uncropped shots from the early 80s. They show the mundane reality of life in the complex—people drinking tea, the dust in the air, the messy reality of a standoff.
Making Sense of the Symbolism
If you're trying to understand why this matters, you have to look past the ink and paper. These images are a mirror. When a person looks at a photo of Bhindranwale, they aren't just seeing a man from 1984. They are seeing their own view on justice, religion, and the state of Punjab today.
📖 Related: Franklin D Roosevelt Civil Rights Record: Why It Is Way More Complicated Than You Think
For the families of those who disappeared during the militancy years, the image might represent a dark time. For the families of those who felt persecuted by the police, it represents a voice.
Next Steps for Researching This Topic:
If you want to understand the visual history better, don't just look at social media.
- Check the archives of major Indian newspapers from 1982 to 1984 (like The Tribune or Indian Express).
- Compare the portrayals in books like Amritsar: Mrs Gandhi's Last Battle by Mark Tully versus internal Sikh literature from the Damdami Taksal.
- Look for the photojournalism of Raghu Rai, whose work provides the most neutral, high-quality visual record of that era.
Understanding these images requires looking at both the "Saint" and the "Soldier" labels, and acknowledging that for millions, those two things are inseparable.