When you think of Apollo 13, you probably see Tom Hanks’ face. Or maybe that grainy, terrifying footage of a frozen Jim Lovell staring at a CO2 scrubber made of duct tape and cardboard. But the real images of Apollo 13—the actual physical film rolls that survived the freezing vacuum of a dying spacecraft—tell a much weirder and more technical story than the Hollywood version.
Honestly, it’s a miracle we have any photos at all.
Most people assume NASA just had cameras running like modern GoPros. They didn't. Every single shot was a calculated risk. The crew only had a few Hasselblad cameras and a limited supply of 70mm film. When the oxygen tank blew, the mission shifted from "take pretty pictures of the moon" to "don't die in the dark."
Yet, in that chaos, they managed to capture 584 stills.
The Shot That Saved the Mission (Literally)
You’ve likely seen the photo of the Service Module floating away, its side ripped open like a tin can. That’s arguably the most famous of all images of Apollo 13. But it wasn't just a souvenir. It was forensic evidence.
Ground control had no idea why the tank exploded. They couldn't see the ship. There were no external cameras. When the crew finally jettisoned the Service Module right before reentry, they scrambled to the windows with their Hasselblads.
Why the Quality Sucks (And Why That Matters)
If you look at the raw scans from the Lunar and Planetary Institute, some of these photos look terrible. They’re blurry. Out of focus.
- The Crew was Shaking: Imagine being sleep-deprived, starving, and freezing at $38°F$. Your hands aren't exactly steady.
- Window Fog: The Command Module was so cold that the astronauts' breath was condensing and freezing on the glass.
- Physics: They were moving at thousands of miles per hour while trying to track a tumbling piece of debris.
James Lovell actually shouted, "There's one whole side of that spacecraft missing!" as he took those shots. Without those specific images, NASA engineers might never have fully confirmed the "S-band" antenna damage or the sheer scale of the panel loss.
What Most People Miss in the Lunar Module Photos
There is a specific set of images of Apollo 13 taken inside the Lunar Module (Aquarius) that feels incredibly claustrophobic. If you look closely at the interior shots, you’ll see wires everywhere. It looks like a basement workshop.
One detail people always overlook? The "mailbox."
There's a photo of the makeshift lithium hydroxide canister rig. It’s a mess of plastic bags and suit hoses. But if you zoom in on the high-res scans provided by the ASU Apollo Image Archive, you can see the actual serial numbers on the tape. It’s a reminder that this wasn't some magical space tech; it was literally whatever they had within arm's reach.
The Lunar Farside Images
Since they couldn't land, the crew swung around the back side of the moon. They took photos of the Chaplygin crater. It's haunting.
They were the closest humans had ever been to the lunar surface at that point (and since), but they couldn't touch it. Fred Haise later talked about the "poignancy" of those shots. You're looking at the most beautiful thing in the universe through the window of a life raft.
The Camera Tech: Hasselblad 500EL
For the gear nerds, the cameras used were modified Hasselblad 500ELs.
📖 Related: Lithium Battery for iPhone: Why Yours Is Dying Faster Than It Should
These weren't your off-the-shelf units. NASA stripped them of their leather coverings to prevent outgassing in the vacuum. They used a special "Reseau plate"—a piece of glass with tiny crosshairs (called fiducial marks) etched into it.
You see those little "+" signs on the photos?
Those are for measurement. If a scientist wanted to know how big a crater was, they used the distance between those crosses to calculate scale. On Apollo 13, those marks ended up over images of jagged, twisted metal instead of moon rocks.
How to Find the Real, Unedited Photos Today
If you search Google for "Apollo 13 photos," you get a lot of color-corrected, sharpened versions. They look great, but they aren't "real."
The real film—the stuff that actually went to the moon and back—is kept in a freezer at Johnson Space Center. Seriously. To prevent the emulsion from degrading, NASA keeps the original negatives at $0°F$ ($-18°C$).
Where to look for the good stuff:
- ASU Apollo Image Archive: This is the gold standard. They have raw, uncompressed scans.
- The "March to the Moon" Gallery: Great for seeing the sequence of shots as they happened.
- Project Apollo Archive (Flickr): Kipp Teague has done an incredible job uploading thousands of high-res scans that show the grain and the "mistakes" NASA usually crops out.
Basically, if the photo looks too perfect, it’s probably been "enhanced." The real history is in the grainy, dark, slightly-off-center shots. Those are the ones that capture the sheer desperation of April 1970.
Actionable Next Steps for Enthusiasts:
If you want to see the mission through the eyes of the crew without the Hollywood filter, go to the Apollo 13 in Real Time website. It syncs the actual mission audio with the photos exactly when they were taken.
You can hear Jack Swigert clicking the shutter while Houston is trying to figure out if they have enough power to turn on the heater. It changes how you see every single one of those images of Apollo 13. It stops being a "cool space photo" and starts being a record of survival.