If you’ve spent any time digging through the dusty corners of 1970s Italian cinema, you know it’s a weird place. There are the polished Giallo thrillers, the sweaty spaghetti westerns, and then there’s the "Mondo" genre. Sitting right at the intersection of documentary, exploitation, and pure visual poetry is Il dio sotto la pelle (The God Under the Skin). It’s a 1974 film that basically defies a clean label. Honestly, if you try to explain it to someone who only watches Netflix documentaries, they’ll probably think you’re describing a fever dream.
The film was directed by Folco Quilici and Carlo Alberto Pinelli. Most people recognize Quilici as a heavy hitter in the world of maritime documentaries and underwater cinematography. He wasn't some low-rent shock merchant. But here, he teamed up with Pinelli to create something that feels like a travelogue through the lens of a philosopher who’s had a bit too much espresso.
It’s about humanity. Sorta.
What Il dio sotto la pelle actually is (and isn't)
Most people get this film wrong. They see the "Mondo" tag and assume it’s all blood, guts, and staged tribal rituals designed to make Westerners feel superior. While it shares some DNA with Mondo Cane, it’s actually much more meditative. It’s a journey across the globe—from the South Pacific to the deserts of Africa—looking for the spark of the divine in the physical body.
There’s this obsession with the "skin" as a barrier. The directors wanted to show how humans use their bodies to connect with things they can't see. Think of it as a cinematic essay on ecstasy. Not the drug, but the state of being.
The music that changed everything
You can't talk about Il dio sotto la pelle without talking about Piero Piccioni. Seriously. The soundtrack is probably more famous than the movie itself at this point. Piccioni was a genius of the "lounge" and "easy listening" era, but for this film, he went somewhere else.
🔗 Read more: Blink-182 Mark Hoppus: What Most People Get Wrong About His 2026 Comeback
He blended tribal percussion with sleek, psychedelic jazz and ethereal vocals by Edda Dell'Orso. If you’ve heard Morricone’s work, you know Edda’s voice—it’s that soaring, wordless soprano that sounds like a ghost in a cathedral. In this film, the music does the heavy lifting. Because there isn't a traditional plot, the score provides the emotional narrative. It's groovy, it's unsettling, and it’s deeply beautiful.
Why the 1974 release felt so different
The early 70s were a chaotic time for Italian cinema. Censorship was loosening, but the "snuff" rumors were starting to circulate around movies like Cannibal Holocaust (which came later, but the seeds were being sown). Il dio sotto la pelle didn't lean into the gore. Instead, it leaned into the exotic.
It captures rituals that probably don't exist anymore, or at least not in this form. There’s a scene involving the "land divers" of Pentecost Island (Vanuatu). Nowadays, you can see this in 4K on National Geographic. But in 1974? Seeing men jump off wooden towers with vines tied to their ankles, filmed with this specific grain of 35mm film, felt like looking into another dimension.
The pacing is erratic. One minute you’re watching a slow-motion dance, the next you’re thrust into a bustling market. It mimics the heartbeat. Fast, then slow.
The controversy of the "Mondo" gaze
We have to be real here: the film has its problems. Like many "Mondo" films, there is a definite "Western Gaze" happening. It looks at non-Western cultures as "the other." While Quilici and Pinelli seem to have a genuine respect for their subjects—they aren't trying to make them look like monsters—there is still a level of exploitation.
💡 You might also like: Why Grand Funk’s Bad Time is Secretly the Best Pop Song of the 1970s
They are hunting for "the primitive."
It’s a complicated legacy. On one hand, it’s a stunning piece of cinematography. On the other, it’s a relic of a time when European filmmakers treated the rest of the world like a private zoo for their cameras. If you’re watching it today, you have to keep that context in mind. You're seeing a version of the world curated by two Italian men who were obsessed with a specific idea of spirituality.
The technical mastery of Folco Quilici
Quilici was a master. He won an Oscar for The Living Sea (1956), and his eye for composition is what saves Il dio sotto la pelle from being a forgotten piece of trash cinema. He uses light in a way that makes the skin look like landscape.
There are long takes where the camera just hangs on a face. No dialogue. No subtitles. Just the expression of a person in a trance or in pain. It’s a visceral experience. This wasn't shot on a digital sensor; this was celluloid, and you can feel the heat of the locations through the screen.
The editing is where the "Il dio" (The God) part comes in. By cutting between different cultures performing similar physical acts, the movie argues that we are all basically doing the same thing. We’re all trying to get out of our own heads and into something bigger.
📖 Related: Why La Mera Mera Radio is Actually Dominating Local Airwaves Right Now
Realities of the production
- Filmed on location in Thailand, Indonesia, Africa, and the South Pacific.
- The production took years to compile the footage.
- It was often marketed in Germany and Japan with much more sensationalist titles to trick people into thinking it was a horror movie.
How to watch it today
Finding a clean copy is a bit of a nightmare. For a long time, you could only find grainy VHS rips or bootleg DVDs with terrible Japanese subtitles. Thankfully, boutique labels have started to realize that the Piccioni soundtrack is a goldmine, which has led to a renewed interest in the film itself.
If you’re a fan of visual storytelling, it’s a must-watch. Just don't go in expecting a plot. It’s a vibe. A long, strange, beautiful, and sometimes uncomfortable vibe.
The movie isn't just about what’s under the skin. It’s about the fact that the skin is the only thing we have to navigate the world. It’s a thin line between us and the universe. Il dio sotto la pelle spends 90 minutes poking at that line.
Actionable insights for film collectors and cinephiles
If you want to actually dive into this world, don't just search for the movie. You'll hit a wall.
- Seek out the Soundtrack First: Start with the Piero Piccioni score. It's available on most streaming platforms and high-quality vinyl reissues (look for the Schema or Dagored labels). It provides the essential context for the film’s "soul."
- Compare with 'L'Ultima Grido': If you want to see how this film fits into the broader Italian documentary scene, watch it alongside Quilici’s other works. You’ll see a stylistic bridge between his "educational" films and his "artistic" ones.
- Check Italian Archive Sites: Sites like Cinematografo or the Archivio del Cinema Italiano have the most accurate historical data on its reception and the technical crew involved, which clears up a lot of the myths found on English-language forums.
- Watch for the Cinematography, not the "Facts": Approach the film as a visual poem rather than a literal documentary. Much of the narration in 70s Mondo films was exaggerated for dramatic effect. Focus on the framing and the editing—that's where the real "expert" craft lives.
By treating the film as an artifact of a specific era in Italian art, you get way more out of it than if you just look at it as a weird old movie. It’s a window into how the 1970s viewed the "divine" through the physical.