I Believe in the Future of Farming: Why Agriculture Is Actually Getting More Personal

I Believe in the Future of Farming: Why Agriculture Is Actually Getting More Personal

You've probably seen the hats. If you grew up anywhere near a 4-H club or a county fair, you know the words by heart. "I believe in the future of farming, with a faith born not of words but of deeds." It’s the opening line of the FFA Creed, written by E.M. Tiffany back in 1928. For decades, it was a sentimental nod to the hardworking family farmer. But today? Honestly, that sentence feels less like a nostalgic poem and a lot more like a high-stakes tech manifesto.

Agriculture is messy. It’s dirty, unpredictable, and currently undergoing a massive identity crisis. We’re moving away from the era of "get big or get out" and sliding into something much more interesting.

The dirt is becoming data.

When I say I believe in the future of farming, I’m not talking about some sci-fi movie where robots do everything while humans sit in pods. I’m talking about a specific shift toward "Precision Ag" and regenerative practices that actually make the land better, not just more exhausted. We’ve spent the last century trying to dominate nature with chemistry. Now, we’re finally starting to partner with it using physics and biology.

The Myth of the Dying Family Farm

People love to say the family farm is dead. It makes for a great headline, right? But if you look at the USDA’s 2022 Census of Agriculture, the reality is a bit more nuanced. Sure, the number of farms is shrinking—down to about 1.9 million—but 97% of them are still family-owned and operated. The scale has just shifted.

The real story isn't about disappearing farmers; it's about the tools they use.

I recently looked into how a mid-sized corn grower in Iowa manages their nitrogen. Ten years ago, they’d spray the whole field and hope for the best. Today, they’re using variable-rate technology (VRT). This isn't just a fancy GPS. It’s a system that talks to satellites to see which specific square meter of soil is hungry and which one is full. They’re saving money. They’re keeping runoff out of the local creeks. It’s a win that doesn't get enough credit in mainstream news.

But it’s not all sunshine and high yields.

The average age of a U.S. farmer is nearly 58. That’s a problem. If we don’t get younger people excited about the dirt, all the technology in the world won’t matter. This is where the "deeds" part of the creed comes in. We’re seeing a surge in "aggies" who are as comfortable with Python script as they are with a grease gun.

📖 Related: Installing a Push Button Start Kit: What You Need to Know Before Tearing Your Dash Apart

Why Tech Isn't the Enemy of the Soil

There’s this weird tension. On one side, you have the "back to the land" movement—organic, small-scale, permaculture. On the other, you have Big Ag—autonomous tractors, CRISPR seeds, and massive combines.

Most people think these two worlds can't coexist. They're wrong.

High-tech farming is actually making small-scale farming viable again. Think about indoor vertical farming. Companies like Plenty or Bowery are growing lettuce in the middle of cities. They use 90% less water than traditional fields. Is it "natural"? Maybe not in the way we usually think about it. But is it the future? Absolutely.

When I believe in the future of farming, I'm looking at the convergence of these two worlds.

Take the Carbon Market. It’s a bit of a "Wild West" right now, but the premise is solid. Companies pay farmers to keep carbon in the ground through cover cropping and no-till farming. This turns a farmer into a "carbon harvester." It’s a totally new revenue stream that didn't exist when E.M. Tiffany was writing his creed.

The Realities of Autonomy

Let's talk about John Deere’s 8R autonomous tractor. It’s a beast. It can plow a field while the farmer is at home having breakfast. Some people find this terrifying. They think it removes the "soul" of farming.

I see it differently.

Farming is exhausting. It’s 16-hour days during harvest that break your back and your spirit. If a machine can handle the monotonous tilling, the farmer has more time to focus on the business, the soil health, and—let’s be real—their family. The tech isn't replacing the farmer; it's replacing the drudgery.

👉 See also: Maya How to Mirror: What Most People Get Wrong

The Water Problem (and the Solutions)

We can't talk about the future without talking about water. Especially in the West. The Colorado River is struggling, and agriculture sucks up a huge chunk of that water. If we don't fix irrigation, the future of farming looks pretty bleak.

But check out what’s happening with N-Drip. It’s an Israeli startup that figured out how to do drip irrigation using only gravity—no expensive pumps or high-energy costs. It’s a game-changer for places like Arizona or California. It allows traditional flood-irrigated fields to cut water use by half while increasing yields.

This is the stuff that gives me hope.

It’s not just about "saving the planet" in an abstract sense. It’s about the brutal math of survival. Farmers are the most pragmatic people on earth. They don't adopt tech because it's cool; they adopt it because it works. If it saves water and grows more food, they’re in.

Biology Over Chemistry

The 20th century was the century of chemistry. We solved problems with fertilizers and pesticides. It worked—we fed billions of people. But it had a cost.

The 21st century is the century of biology.

We’re seeing the rise of biologicals—treatments made from microbes and fungi that help plants grow without the heavy chemical footprint. Companies like Joyn Bio (a Ginkgo Bioworks and Bayer joint venture) are working on microbes that let cereal crops like corn and wheat "fix" their own nitrogen from the air.

Imagine a cornfield that doesn't need synthetic fertilizer.

✨ Don't miss: Why the iPhone 7 Red iPhone 7 Special Edition Still Hits Different Today

That would be the biggest breakthrough since the Haber-Bosch process. It would slash greenhouse gas emissions and save farmers a fortune. It's still in the works, but the science is real.

Addressing the Skeptics

Look, I know what you’re thinking. "Isn't this just helping corporate giants get richer?"

It’s a fair question. Consolidation is a massive issue. When four companies control the vast majority of the world’s seed and meat processing, the individual farmer loses leverage. That’s a fact.

However, the internet is a great equalizer.

Direct-to-consumer farming is exploding. Platforms like Barn2Door or even just Instagram allow a rancher in Montana to sell beef directly to a family in Chicago. They’re bypassing the "middlemen" who have squeezed their margins for decades.

The "future" isn't just one thing. It's not just a 50,000-acre mega-farm. It’s also a 5-acre market garden using intensive techniques to produce as much food as a traditional 50-acre plot.

Actionable Steps for the Future

If you care about where your food comes from or if you're looking to get into the industry, here is how you actually participate in the future of farming.

  • Look Beyond the "Organic" Label: Start looking for "Regenerative" certifications. Organic focuses on what isn't there (no chemicals). Regenerative focuses on what is there—soil health, biodiversity, and carbon sequestration. It’s a much more holistic way to judge a farm’s impact.
  • Support Ag-Tech Literacy: If you have a say in local education, push for ag-tech in schools. We need kids who can code and weld. The future of the food supply depends on a workforce that understands both the cloud and the soil.
  • Invest in Local Supply Chains: The "Future of Farming" is only secure if the infrastructure exists to move the food. Support local grain mills, small-scale slaughterhouses, and regional food hubs. These are the "missing middle" of our food system.
  • Follow the Leaders: Keep an eye on people like Gabe Brown (author of Dirt to Soil) or the researchers at the Land Institute. They are the ones proving that high-yield farming doesn't have to destroy the earth.
  • Question the "Doom" Narrative: Agriculture has always been in a state of transition. Don't fall for the idea that it's all disappearing. It's evolving.

The reason I believe in the future of farming is simple: we have no choice. We have 8 billion people to feed, and the old ways of doing things are hitting a wall. The innovation happening right now—from the soil microbiome to the satellites in orbit—is the most exciting thing in the world.

It’s not just about food. It’s about resilience. It’s about taking the creed's "faith born of deeds" and applying it to the most complex problems our species has ever faced. And honestly? The farmers are the ones who are going to figure it out.