I Am a Running Mate: The Chaos and Reality of Being Number Two

I Am a Running Mate: The Chaos and Reality of Being Number Two

Politics is a brutal business. You spend your whole life building a brand, a career, and a set of beliefs only to realize that, sometimes, your best shot at power is to stand three feet behind someone else and clap. When a politician says "I am a running mate," they aren't just accepting a job offer. They are agreeing to have their entire life—tax returns, college roommates, and that one weird thing they said in a 1994 local news interview—dissected by a team of researchers whose only goal is to find a reason to fire them before the convention even starts.

It's a weird spot to be in. Honestly, the vice presidency has been called everything from "not worth a bucket of warm piss" by John Nance Garner to the most important heartbeat in the world. But before you get to the West Wing, you have to survive the campaign trail.

What it Actually Means When Someone Says I Am a Running Mate

The phrase "I am a running mate" carries a massive weight of submission. In the American political system, the person in the second slot has to pivot instantly. One day they are a governor or a senator with their own platform; the next, they are a professional backup singer. Their job is to amplify the nominee's message and, more importantly, to be the "attack dog."

Think about the 2024 cycle or even going back to the chaos of 2008. When Sarah Palin was picked, she went from a relatively unknown governor to the most famous woman in the world overnight. That transition is jarring. You lose your name. You become "The VP Pick." You are a tool for geographic balance or ideological outreach. If the top of the ticket is a moderate from the Northeast, the running mate probably needs to be a firebrand from the South or the Midwest. It’s basically a high-stakes version of a buddy-cop movie where the two leads might actually hate each other.

The Vetting Process is a Nightmare

Before a candidate can publicly say "I am a running mate," they go through a process called "the vet." It is invasive. It's worse than a colonoscopy. Law firms like Williams & Connolly have historically handled this for Democratic candidates, while Republicans use similar high-level legal teams to scrub every inch of a person's existence.

They look for "the bomb." The bomb is the scandal that kills a campaign. In 1972, Thomas Eagleton had to step down as George McGovern's running mate because it came out he had undergone electroshock therapy for depression. Today, that might not be a dealbreaker, but in '72, it was terminal. The vetting team asks questions about your marriage, your kids, your nannies, and whether you’ve ever paid taxes late. If you lie to the vetters, you’re toast.

📖 Related: The Galveston Hurricane 1900 Orphanage Story Is More Tragic Than You Realized

The Strategy of the "Ticket"

People think the running mate is there to lead. They aren't. Not really. They are there to "do no harm."

  • Geographic Balance: This is the old-school way. Picking LBJ helped JFK win Texas. Simple math.
  • Demographic Appeal: In 2020, Joe Biden specifically looked for a woman of color, eventually landing on Kamala Harris to energize a specific base of the party.
  • Experience Gaps: If the presidential nominee is a Washington outsider (like Trump in 2016), they pick a steady hand (like Mike Pence) to reassure the establishment.

But does it actually work? Political scientists like Christopher Devine and Kyle Kopko have spent years studying this. Their research suggests that the "VP bump" in a candidate's home state is actually pretty small. It’s more about the perception of the presidential nominee’s judgment. If you pick a mess, you look like you can’t manage a lemonade stand, let alone the executive branch.

The Moment of the Announcement

Everything changed with social media. It used to be a phone call and a staged rally. Now, it’s a text message blast at 2:00 AM or a slickly produced video dropped on X. When the candidate finally stands on that stage and says, "I am a running mate," they are usually exhausted. They’ve been hiding in private jets and smuggled into hotels through service elevators for three days to avoid reporters.

The optics are everything. You have to look like you're friends. You have to laugh at their jokes. Even if you spent the last six months during the primary calling them a threat to the nation, once you are the running mate, those old clips are supposed to disappear. (They don't. The internet is forever.)

Why Anyone Would Want the Job

It’s a gamble. Being a running mate can be a fast track to the presidency—look at Nixon, LBJ, Bush 41, and Biden. But it can also be a political graveyard. If you lose, you’re the person who couldn't deliver your home state. You’re the reason the "real" candidate lost. You become a trivia question.

👉 See also: Why the Air France Crash Toronto Miracle Still Changes How We Fly

Remember Dan Quayle? He was a young, rising star. Then he had a few gaffes—the "potatoe" incident being the most famous—and his brand was permanently altered. He became the punchline for a generation. Being a running mate means handing over the keys to your reputation to someone else's campaign manager.

The Debate: The Only Night That Matters

For the running mate, the Vice Presidential Debate is the Super Bowl. It’s the one time they aren't in the shadow. These debates rarely change the outcome of an election, but they create "moments."

  1. Lloyd Bentsen vs. Dan Quayle (1988): "Senator, you're no Jack Kennedy." That line lived longer than the actual campaign.
  2. Admiral James Stockdale (1992): "Who am I? Why am I here?" Stockdale was a war hero, but he wasn't a politician. He looked lost, and it hurt Ross Perot's third-party run.
  3. Dick Cheney vs. John Edwards (2004): A masterclass in "gravitas" versus "charm."

The goal for the running mate in these debates is simple: don't embarrass the boss. Defend the record. Attack the opponent. Stay on script. If you're bored watching it, the running mate did their job correctly.

Life on the "B" Campaign

The presidential candidate travels on a massive Boeing 747 with a huge press corps. The running mate gets a smaller plane. They go to the places the "big" candidate doesn't have time for. They do the 6:00 AM interviews with local news in Scranton or Des Moines. They eat a lot of cold pizza and rubbery chicken at fundraisers.

It’s a lonely existence. You’re surrounded by staff, but they aren't your staff. They are the national committee's staff. Their loyalty is to the top of the ticket. If there’s a choice between protecting the presidential nominee or protecting you, you’re getting thrown under the bus every single time.

✨ Don't miss: Robert Hanssen: What Most People Get Wrong About the FBI's Most Damaging Spy

The Actionable Reality of Presidential Politics

If you are following an election or trying to understand the impact of a "running mate" announcement, look past the shiny rally. Look at the data.

  • Check the "favorability" polls of the running mate before and after the announcement. Usually, their "unfavorable" rating spikes as the opposing party starts spending millions on attack ads.
  • Watch the "independents." The running mate isn't meant to change the minds of the base; they are meant to make the guy or gal in the middle feel "safe."
  • Follow the money. See if the running mate pick opens up new donor networks. If a candidate picks a billionaire’s favorite senator, it’s a sign they need cash for the final sprint.

The phrase "I am a running mate" is a promise to play second fiddle for the chance to one day lead the orchestra. It’s a position of immense temporary power and total subservience. Understanding that tension is the only way to truly understand how American elections are won or lost in the margins.

If you’re watching a campaign unfold, pay attention to the first solo interview the running mate gives. That is the moment the "vetting" ends and the real-world pressure begins. Look for how they handle questions where their past positions contradict the nominee’s current platform. That’s where the "running mate" earns their paycheck—or loses the election.

Evaluate the choice not by how much you like the person, but by how well they fill the holes in the nominee’s resume. That’s the true measure of a successful "number two."