How Wall Street Got Trump Wrong: What Really Happened

How Wall Street Got Trump Wrong: What Really Happened

Wall Street loves a good spreadsheet, but it turns out spreadsheets are terrible at predicting a populist with a smartphone. If you look back at the late 2024 predictions from the big banks—Goldman, J.P. Morgan, the whole lot—most of them were bracing for a very different 2025 than the one we actually lived through.

They thought they had him figured out. The consensus was pretty simple: tariffs would spike inflation immediately, the Fed would stop cutting rates in a panic, and the "Trump Trade" would be a carbon copy of 2016. Fast forward to today, January 2026, and the reality has been much more of a "choose your own adventure" book where the pages keep changing.

The Tariff Panic That Wasn't (Quite)

Remember the "Liberation Day" tariffs in April 2025? Analysts at the time were screaming from the rooftops that we’d see an immediate 1% jump in CPI. They predicted shoppers would abandon retailers and that the "real economy" would essentially freeze.

It didn't happen like that. Honestly, the market's adaptability was the biggest shocker. While the S&P 500 did hit a nasty floor on April 8, 2025, the "doom loop" never materialized. Why? Because the administration used those tariffs more like a game of high-stakes poker than a fixed tax. They backtracked on certain duties, negotiated side deals, and basically kept the "effective" tariff rate around 12%—far lower than the 60% "blanket" figures that kept analysts up at night in 2024.

✨ Don't miss: Assistance with writing a business plan: Why your first draft usually fails

Wall Street missed the nuance of the negotiation. They treated campaign rhetoric as a final accounting entry. You've seen this before, but in 2025, the gap between "threat" and "implementation" was where the smart money actually made its gains.

The AI "Hail Mary"

Nobody—and I mean nobody—expected the administration to pivot so hard into being the "AI White House." The bromance between the executive branch and Silicon Valley luminaries like Jensen Huang of Nvidia redefined the 2025 economy.

While banks were worried about manufacturing jobs and "bringing the factories back," the administration was busy betting the farm on data centers and GPU spending. We saw over $425 billion in VC deals in 2025 alone, with more than half of that swallowed up by AI.

  • The Prediction: A focus on "old school" industrials and blue-collar manufacturing.
  • The Reality: A massive tech-driven bull market fueled by deregulation of AI and energy.
  • The Result: GDP surged to a staggering 4.3% in the summer of 2025, driven not by factories, but by silicon.

The Fed Battle and the "Stupid Person" Comments

If you want to talk about where Wall Street got the "vibes" wrong, look no further than the Federal Reserve. The smart set on the 40th floor of the big banks thought Trump would eventually play nice with Jerome Powell to keep markets stable.

Instead, we got 2025’s "War on the Fed." We saw the President calling Powell a "numbskull" on social media and the Justice Department actually opening an investigation into Powell over building renovations. Wall Street predicted this would cause Treasury yields to skyrocket to 6%. Instead, yields hovered around 4% for much of the year because the market started to care more about the "One Big Beautiful Bill" tax cuts than the drama in D.C.

It turns out, the market can stomach a lot of political noise as long as the corporate tax rate is low and the AI chips are flowing.

Where the "Real" Economy Diverged

While the "tech bros" and finance guys were popping champagne over an S&P 500 that reached 6,932 in late 2024, the blue-collar recovery Wall Street predicted was... let's say, mixed.

  1. Wage growth didn't keep pace with the cost of living.
  2. The "mass deportation" rhetoric caused a massive labor crunch in construction.
  3. Blue-collar hiring actually slowed down in the second half of 2025.

The "Trump Trade" was supposed to be for the forgotten man. In reality, it was a windfall for the Magnificent 7. Analysts who predicted a "broad-based" industrial renaissance are still waiting for it to show up in the data.

✨ Don't miss: When Did Redbox Start? The Weird History of the McDonald’s Kiosk That Changed Movies

Practical Insights for 2026

If 2025 taught us anything, it's that the "institutional" view is often too rigid to account for a populist executive. Here is how you should actually be looking at the landscape as we move deeper into 2026:

  • Watch the "Effective" Rate, Not the Headline: Ignore the 60% tariff tweets. Look at what companies are actually paying at the port. The Yale Budget Lab puts the 2026 effective rate closer to 14.4%.
  • Bet on the "Winner-Takes-All" Dynamic: The J.P. Morgan 2026 outlook is right about one thing: market concentration isn't going away. The "AI supercycle" is still the only game in town.
  • Real Estate is the New Wildcard: With the recent move to ban institutional investors from buying single-family homes, keep a very close eye on Blackstone and other large-scale landlords. This "populist Keynesianism" is a direct threat to a sector Wall Street thought was safe.
  • The Fed Independence Discount: Don't assume the Fed is "safe." If the administration successfully installs a "loyalist" chair when Powell’s term ends in May 2026, expect a massive spike in gold and silver as investors hedge against a politicized dollar.

Wall Street's biggest mistake was assuming the 2024 version of Trump would act like the 2016 version. But the 2025-2026 era is defined by a much more aggressive, tech-focused, and interventionist approach. Basically, if you're still trading based on a 2017 playbook, you're already behind.


Next Steps: You should review your portfolio’s exposure to "Big Landlord" stocks like Blackstone and American Homes 4 Rent, as the administration's new housing restrictions are likely to create a volatile exit for institutional capital in Q1 2026.