You can’t just poke a hole in a tennis ball and pull the rubber through the gap. That’s cheating. If you want to turn a sphere inside out, you have to follow the rules of topology, which basically treat surfaces like infinitely stretchy, magical play-dough that can pass through itself but can’t ever be creased, torn, or folded into a sharp point.
It sounds impossible. Honestly, for decades, even the smartest mathematicians on the planet assumed it couldn't be done. They figured if you tried to flip a sphere, you’d inevitably hit a point where the surface would have to pinch or "kink," which is a big no-no in the world of differential topology. Then came Stephen Smale. In 1957, he proved it was possible. People thought he was joking at first. Even his advisor didn't believe him. But the math was solid. This process is now famously known as Smale’s Paradox.
Why Your Brain Thinks It Is Impossible
Imagine a balloon. If you try to push the North Pole down toward the South Pole, you eventually get a double-layered disk. To get the inside surface to become the outside, you’d have to stretch it until it snaps or force it through a sharp corner. In everyday physics, you're right. It is impossible.
💡 You might also like: How to Host an Image on Imgur Without Giving Up Your Privacy
But topology isn't physics. It’s the study of properties that stay the same when you deform an object. In this specific playground, we are talking about an "immersion." An immersion allows the surface to pass through itself—like a ghost walking through a wall—but it forbids "cusps." A cusp is basically a sharp point where the curvature becomes infinite. If you can flip the sphere while keeping the surface "smooth" at every single nanosecond of the transformation, you’ve succeeded.
Smale’s proof was an existence proof. It said, "Yes, this can happen," but it didn't actually show how. It was like someone proving a recipe exists for a cake that tastes like blue light, but they don't give you the ingredients or the oven temperature. It took years for others to actually visualize the steps.
The Smale Paradox and the Blind Mathematician
One of the most mind-blowing parts of this story involves Bernard Morin. Morin was a French mathematician who was instrumental in figuring out how to actually see the sphere eversion. He also happened to be blind from the age of six.
Think about that for a second.
One of the most complex visual puzzles in human history—a feat of 4D spatial reasoning that leaves most sighted people with a massive headache—was decoded by a man who perceived the world through touch and mental models. Morin’s work led to the "Morin Surface," a complex halfway point in the eversion process.
To turn a sphere inside out, you don't just pull it. You have to twist it into these weird, symmetrical lobed shapes. If you just try to squash it, you get a crease. If you twist it while squashing it, you distribute the "stress" of the turn across the whole surface, avoiding those illegal sharp points. It’s like a very complicated dance where the dancers are allowed to phase through each other's bodies.
Step by Step: The Geometry of the Flip
If you’re trying to visualize this, stop thinking about a solid object. Think about a shimmering, translucent film.
First, you introduce some "corrugations." You make the sphere look a bit like a ruffled potato chip or a sea anemone. By creating these ripples, you’re basically prepping the surface to pass through itself without creating a sharp edge.
📖 Related: Apple watchOS 11 Explained: What Most People Get Wrong About the Vitals App
Next comes the "Max Boy" or "Boy's Surface" territory. Named after Werner Boy, this is a shape that represents a projected plane in 3D space. During the eversion, the sphere has to pass through a stage where it looks like a bunch of interlocking petals. At the exact midway point, the shape is perfectly symmetrical. The "inside" and "outside" are effectively doing a 50/50 split of the surface area.
- The surface pushes through itself in two opposite directions.
- The equator twists.
- The lobes expand and contract.
- Suddenly, the "inner" color is now the "outer" color.
It’s messy. If you watch the famous 1994 video Outside In (produced by the Geometry Center at the University of Minnesota), you’ll see the surface turning into something that looks like a cross between a ginger root and a psychedelic jellyfish. But at no point does it ever break.
The Rules of the Game: What’s Allowed?
In the strict world of topology, the rules for eversion are:
- Self-intersection is okay. The surface can occupy the same space as itself.
- No tearing. You cannot create a hole, even for a millisecond.
- No creasing. The surface must stay "differentiable." This means if you were a tiny ant walking on it, you’d never encounter a sharp cliff or a needle-point.
When Smale first proposed this, his colleagues were skeptical because a circle cannot be turned inside out in 2D space without a crease. If you take a rubber band and try to flip it while keeping it on a flat table, you’ll always hit a point where the rubber has to fold flat against itself. That's a "singular" point. Smale proved that adding that one extra dimension—moving from 2D (a circle) to 3D (a sphere surface)—gives the math enough "room" to wiggle out of the crease.
Why Does This Even Matter?
You might be wondering if this is just mathematicians being bored. It’s not. Well, maybe a little bit. But the implications are huge.
The math used to turn a sphere inside out relates to something called "homotopy theory." This is the same kind of math used to understand how proteins fold in your body. It’s used in robotics to plan movements for robotic arms so they don't collide with themselves. It’s used in data science to understand the "shape" of high-dimensional data.
When you understand how a surface can transform without losing its core properties, you’re learning how to manipulate complex systems. Whether that's a magnetic field in a fusion reactor or the way a virus attaches to a cell, the "topology" of the interaction is often the most important part.
The 1994 Breakthrough: Visualizing the Impossible
Before the 90s, most people just took the math on faith. Then, computer graphics caught up. A team including Nathaniel Thurston (son of the legendary William Thurston) used software to render the process. They realized that to make it understandable to humans, they had to "strip" the sphere into ribbons or use transparency.
When you see it rendered, it looks like a series of loops passing through each other. It’s beautiful and deeply unsettling. It defies every instinct we have about how physical matter should behave. But that’s the beauty of math. It isn't limited by the "hardness" of atoms.
Common Misconceptions
- "It's just a trick of perspective." No, it’s a literal mathematical transformation.
- "You need 4D space to do it." Actually, while it's easier to imagine in 4D, the eversion happens entirely within 3D space. The "self-intersection" is the key.
- "Any shape can do this." Not true. The "genus" of the shape matters. A torus (donut shape) has different rules than a sphere.
How to Wrap Your Head Around It
If you want to truly grasp how to turn a sphere inside out, you have to let go of the idea of "solid" objects. Think about the surface as a field of vectors. Every point on the sphere has a "normal" vector—an arrow pointing straight out. The goal of eversion is to make all those arrows point straight in, without ever having a moment where the arrows don't know which way to go.
It's about the flow.
Mathematically, we describe this using the $h$-principle (homotopy principle). Mikhael Gromov, another giant in the field, expanded on Smale’s work to show that these kinds of "impossible" transformations are actually quite common in certain types of geometric problems.
🔗 Read more: Why Flexible E Ink Displays Might Finally Replace Your Paper Notebooks
If you're looking for a "real world" version, you won't find one. You can't do this with a physical balloon because atoms can't pass through atoms. But in the world of computer modeling and theoretical physics, we "evert" things all the time. We flip magnetic poles in simulations, and we model the way spacetime might warp near a singularity.
Actionable Takeaways for the Curious
If this sparked a fire in your brain, don't just stop here. Most people find the concept fascinating but never look at the actual geometry.
- Watch the classic visualizations. Search for "Outside In (1994)" on YouTube. It is the gold standard. Even though the CGI is dated, the explanation of the "corrugations" is the best ever filmed.
- Play with a "Torus Eversion" simulator. If you think a sphere is weird, wait until you see what you can do with a donut.
- Read about Stephen Smale. The guy didn't just flip spheres; he won the Fields Medal and made massive contributions to chaos theory. His life story is a testament to the idea that if the math says it’s possible, it doesn't matter if everyone else says it’s crazy.
- Look into 3D printing. Some artists have actually 3D printed the "Morin Surface" and other halfway points of the eversion. Holding a physical model of a self-intersecting sphere helps the brain bridge the gap between "ghostly math" and "physical reality."
The sphere eversion is a reminder that the universe is much more flexible than it looks. Sometimes, the only thing stopping you from turning your world inside out is the belief that you aren't allowed to pass through yourself. In topology, you are. In life? Maybe that’s a different kind of math.