Winged Foot is a beast. Anyone who has ever stepped onto that property in Mamaroneck knows it doesn’t just penalize bad shots; it humiliates them. When the USGA rolled into New York in September 2020—delayed from its usual Father’s Day slot because of the global chaos—the narrative was set. We were told the 2020 US Open leaderboard would be a graveyard of over-aggressive players. The "experts" predicted that hitting fairways was the only path to survival. They were wrong.
Bryson DeChambeau didn't just win; he broke the blueprint.
Looking back at the final standings, you see a leaderboard that looks like a statistical anomaly. While the rest of the field was hacking out of the thick, four-inch primary rough, one man decided that distance was the only variable that mattered. It was a polarizing week. It changed how we think about professional golf, and frankly, it still sparks arguments in 19th holes across the country today.
The Day the Rough Didn't Matter
If you look at the 2020 US Open leaderboard, the first thing that jumps out is the gap. Bryson DeChambeau finished at 6-under par. The runner-up, Matthew Wolff, was at even par. Nobody else in the entire field broke even. In fact, third place was Louis Oosthuizen at 2-over.
It was a bloodbath.
DeChambeau’s strategy was basically a middle finger to a century of golf architecture. He hit only 23 of 56 fairways. Traditionally, that's a recipe for a missed cut at a US Open. But he realized something simple: if you hit it far enough, even from the rough, you’re hitting a wedge into the green while everyone else is hitting a 5-iron from the short grass.
His final round 67 was the only sub-par round on Sunday. Just think about that for a second. The pressure of a Major, the narrowest fairways in the world, and he goes out and shoots 3-under while the rest of the world's best golfers are hanging on for dear life. It was a physical and mental dismantling of a golf course.
The Wolff in the Lead
For a long time on Saturday and early Sunday, it looked like Matthew Wolff might be the story. He was 21 years old. He had that funky, looped swing that looks like it shouldn't work, but it absolutely flushes the ball. Wolff held a two-shot lead going into the final round.
But Winged Foot has a way of finding your cracks.
Wolff struggled to keep pace once Bryson started hammering drives 350 yards. By the time they reached the back nine, the momentum had shifted entirely. Wolff's 75 on Sunday was a heartbreaking finish, but it secured him a solo second-place finish—a massive result for a kid basically just starting his career.
💡 You might also like: NFL Pick 'em Predictions: Why You're Probably Overthinking the Divisional Round
Breaking Down the Top 10
The 2020 US Open leaderboard wasn't just about the top two guys, though they dominated the airwaves.
Louis Oosthuizen did what Louis does. He swung it beautifully, stayed out of the headlines, and quietly finished third. He's arguably the most consistent Major performer of his generation who doesn't have five trophies on his mantle.
Then you had Harris English. He finished fourth. People forget how good Harris was playing during that stretch. He was one of the few guys who actually looked comfortable in the wind and the thick grass.
- Bryson DeChambeau (-6)
- Matthew Wolff (E)
- Louis Oosthuizen (+2)
- Harris English (+3)
- Xander Schauffele (+4)
- Dustin Johnson (+5)
- Will Zalatoris (+5)
- Rory McIlroy (+6)
Xander Schauffele, the perennial "top-five-in-a-Major" guy, was right there again. He finished fifth. It's almost a meme at this point, but Xander’s ability to navigate difficult setups is legendary. He just couldn't find the birdies on Sunday to pressure the lead.
The Arrival of Will Zalatoris
Remember when Will Zalatoris was just a guy with a sponsor’s invite? The 2020 US Open was his massive coming-out party. He finished T6.
He even aced the par-3 7th hole on Thursday. Talk about a way to introduce yourself to the world. Seeing his name on the 2020 US Open leaderboard next to Dustin Johnson was the first sign that the "new breed" of ball-strikers was ready to take over the PGA Tour. Zalatoris proved that week that his iron play was elite enough to hold up under the most extreme pressure imaginable.
Why the Scoring Was So Brutal
Usually, a US Open is won at 1 or 2 under. Sometimes even over par. But the 2020 edition felt particularly mean.
The greens at Winged Foot are like upside-down saucers. If you miss on the wrong side, you’re looking at a certain bogey, or worse, an "other." Justin Thomas, who led after a brilliant 65 on Thursday, found this out the hard way. He went 73-76-72 to finish T8.
That’s the Winged Foot experience. One day you’re a genius, the next day you’re wondering why you ever picked up a club.
📖 Related: Why the Marlins Won World Series Titles Twice and Then Disappeared
Rory McIlroy had a similar experience. He posted a 67 on Friday to get into the mix. Fans thought, "This is it, Rory's going to get his fifth Major." Then Saturday happened. A 76. It was a rollercoaster that left everyone except Bryson feeling a bit nauseous.
The Science of the Win
Let’s talk about the equipment. Bryson was using a 48-inch driver (or experimenting with the limit) and 3D-printed irons. He was drinking six protein shakes a day. He looked more like a linebacker than a golfer.
Many traditionalists hated it.
They felt he was "bashing and gouging" his way through a masterpiece. But golf is about the lowest score, not the prettiest path. DeChambeau’s win forced the USGA to look seriously at distance. It sparked the whole "bifurcation" and "roll-back" debate that is still raging in 2026. The 2020 US Open leaderboard is essentially the "patient zero" for the modern equipment debate.
Historical Context and Legacy
If you compare this to the 2006 US Open at the same course (the one where Phil Mickelson famously double-bogeyed 18 to lose), the scores were surprisingly similar. Geoff Ogilvy won at 5-over par in '06.
Wait.
Think about that. In 2006, the winning score was +5. In 2020, Bryson was -6.
Did the course get easier? No. The rough was actually deeper in 2020. The players just got better, and one player specifically found a loophole in the system.
Notable Disappointments
Tiger Woods. We have to talk about him. He missed the cut.
👉 See also: Why Funny Fantasy Football Names Actually Win Leagues
It was painful to watch. He shot 73-77. He couldn't find the fairways, and unlike Bryson, he didn't have the brute strength at that stage of his career to muscle the ball onto the greens from the thick stuff. It was a reminder that even the greatest of all time is human when faced with a course that requires absolute physical perfection.
Phil Mickelson also missed the cut. It was a homecoming of sorts for him after the 2006 disaster, but the magic wasn't there. He finished 13-over par through two days.
How to Analyze These Stats for Your Own Game
Honestly, most of us shouldn't try to play like the guys at the top of the 2020 US Open leaderboard. You aren't Bryson. I’m certainly not.
But there are lessons here:
- Commit to your strategy. Bryson didn't waver. Even when he hit a drive into the trees, he stayed aggressive. Most amateurs flip-flop between being "safe" and "aggressive" and end up doing neither well.
- Putting is the great equalizer. Despite all the talk about his drives, Bryson putted out of his mind. He was second in Strokes Gained: Putting for the week. You can't win a US Open if you don't make the 8-footers for par.
- The "Scrambling" Myth. Sometimes, the best way to scramble is to not be in the position to need to. Bryson’s "scrambling" was often just hitting it so far that his "miss" was still 50 yards closer to the hole than his opponent's "good shot."
Looking Back from 2026
It’s been over five years since that Sunday at Winged Foot. When we look at the 2020 US Open leaderboard now, we see a snapshot of a transition period in golf. We see the rise of the "power game" and the last stand of some of the older guard.
It remains one of the most statistically significant tournaments in the history of the sport. It proved that "US Open Style Golf"—the idea of hitting 3-wood for safety and grinding out pars—might be dead at the elite level.
If you want to understand where the professional game is headed, you have to look at what happened in Mamaroneck that week. It wasn't just a golf tournament; it was a laboratory experiment that yielded a very loud, very long-winded result.
Actionable Takeaways for Golf Fans
- Study the Strokes Gained data from this specific tournament if you're a data nerd. It shows exactly where the field lost to Bryson (hint: it's off the tee and on the greens).
- Rewatch the Sunday highlights focusing specifically on the par-4 18th. Look at the lies in the rough. It gives you a true appreciation for how difficult the conditions actually were.
- Check the current world rankings of the guys who were in the top 10 then. You'll see that Winged Foot is an incredible "truth-teller" for who actually has a world-class game.
The 2020 US Open didn't have the fans in the stands, but it had enough drama and controversy to last a decade. It was the week golf changed, whether the purists liked it or not.