When we talk about the first four years of the Trump presidency, the conversation almost always hits a fever pitch when immigration comes up. You’ve probably heard the claims on both sides. One side says it was an unprecedented era of mass removals; the other says it was more about talk than actual results. But if we strip away the political rallies and the social media noise, what do the hard numbers actually show?
Honestly, the reality is a bit more complicated than a simple soundbite. To figure out how many people did Trump deport in his first term, we have to look at the official data from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
The Grand Total: Looking at the Raw Data
Between 2017 and 2020, the Trump administration carried out roughly 935,000 deportations.
Now, if you’re comparing that to other presidents, you might be surprised. For context, during Barack Obama’s first four years, his administration deported about 1.5 million people. That’s a massive gap. But numbers alone don't tell the whole story. You have to look at who was being deported and where they were being picked up.
Why the Numbers Look the Way They Do
People often assume "deportation" is just one thing. It's not. Basically, the government splits these into two main buckets: "removals" and "returns."
- Removals: These are formal legal orders that usually carry a penalty, like being barred from the U.S. for five or ten years.
- Returns: These are often "voluntary" in a sense—people agree to leave without a formal order, usually at the border.
The Trump administration leaned heavily on formal removals. In his first year (Fiscal Year 2017), ICE conducted 226,119 removals. By 2019, that number climbed to about 267,000. But then, 2020 happened.
🔗 Read more: Nate Silver Trump Approval Rating: Why the 2026 Numbers Look So Different
The COVID-19 pandemic threw a wrench into everything. Flights were grounded, borders were restricted under Title 42, and the physical act of moving people across borders became a logistical nightmare. In FY 2020, deportations dropped to around 185,000. That dip is a huge reason why the four-year total stayed under a million.
The Shift to the Interior
Here is what most people get wrong. While the total number of deportations was lower than the Obama era, the source of those deportations changed.
Under previous administrations, the vast majority of removals happened right at the border. If you were caught crossing, you were sent back. Trump shifted the focus. He wanted more "interior" removals—meaning people who were already living in U.S. cities, sometimes for years.
In 2017, ICE administrative arrests (the first step toward interior deportation) jumped by 30%. They weren't just looking for people with serious criminal records anymore. They basically made everyone who was undocumented a priority. This is why you saw so many headlines about long-term residents being picked up at grocery stores or work sites.
A Year-by-Year Breakdown of First-Term Removals
If we look at the fiscal year data provided by ICE, the pattern becomes pretty clear:
💡 You might also like: Weather Forecast Lockport NY: Why Today’s Snow Isn’t Just Hype
- FY 2017: 226,119 deportations (620 per day)
- FY 2018: 256,085 deportations (702 per day)
- FY 2019: 267,258 deportations (732 per day)
- FY 2020: 185,884 deportations (509 per day)
It's also worth noting the "Title 42" factor that started in March 2020. This was a public health order that allowed the government to quickly expel people at the border without the usual legal processing. These "expulsions" aren't always counted in the traditional "deportation" stats, which adds another layer of confusion to the math.
The Criminal Record Myth
There’s a common belief that only people with violent criminal records were targeted. While the administration definitely prioritized those cases—73% of ICE arrests in 2017 involved people with criminal convictions—the net was much wider than before.
Under the Obama administration's "Priority Enforcement Program," the focus was narrowed to those with serious felonies or recent border crossers. Trump’s 2017 Executive Order 13768 essentially said: "If you're here illegally, you're a priority." Period. This led to a 138% increase in removals for people whose only crime was a traffic violation within the first nine months of the term.
Comparing the "Deporter-in-Chief" Titles
It’s a bit of a historical irony. President Obama was famously labeled the "Deporter-in-Chief" by activists because his numbers were so high. Trump used much more aggressive rhetoric, but his actual deportation totals didn't reach those same heights.
Why? Because interior removals are much harder and more expensive to carry out than border removals. They involve long court battles, more man-hours for ICE agents, and limited space in detention centers. You can't just "mass deport" millions of people overnight without a massive increase in funding and judicial resources, something that stalled in Congress during those years.
📖 Related: Economics Related News Articles: What the 2026 Headlines Actually Mean for Your Wallet
What Actually Happened at the Border?
While the administration talked a lot about the wall, the real changes were in policy. Programs like "Remain in Mexico" (Migrant Protection Protocols) were designed to stop people from even entering the U.S. system. If you aren't in the system, you can't be "deported" in the traditional sense—you're just kept out.
This policy shift meant that while the border was "tougher," the official deportation statistics didn't necessarily skyrocket because many people were simply stuck on the other side of the line.
Key Insights and Next Steps
So, if you’re trying to settle a debate or just want the facts, here is the bottom line:
- The total count was around 935,000. This is significantly lower than the 1.5 million from the previous administration's first term.
- The focus was different. The Trump administration prioritized interior arrests over simple border turn-backs.
- COVID-19 changed the game. The 2020 pandemic caused a sharp drop in removals that skewed the four-year average.
- Policy vs. Numbers. Aggressive rhetoric and policies like "Remain in Mexico" were often more about deterrence than high-volume removal numbers.
If you want to track how these numbers are evolving today, your best bet is to look at the ICE Annual Reports or the TRAC Immigration database from Syracuse University. They provide the most granular, non-partisan data available. You can also monitor the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office of Homeland Security Statistics, which has recently updated how they categorize "repatriations" to make comparisons between administrations more transparent.
Understanding these numbers requires looking past the political framing. It’s not just about "more" or "less," but about the fundamental shift in how the U.S. government decided to use its enforcement resources.