Ever stared at a colorful map on election night and wondered why some tiny-looking states have a bigger say than the massive ones? It’s not just a quirk of geography. The whole system is basically a math equation built in 1787 that we’re still solving today. If you've been searching for how many electoral votes are each state, you’re probably looking for a quick number, but the "why" behind those numbers is where things get interesting.
The magic number is 538. To win the presidency, a candidate needs 270. It sounds simple, but every ten years, after the Census Bureau finishes counting every person in the country, the deck gets shuffled.
The Current Map: How Many Electoral Votes Are Each State Right Now?
Right now, we are operating under the 2020 Census numbers. These counts will stay exactly as they are for the 2028 election too. Honestly, the biggest thing to realize is that a state's power isn't permanent. People move. Companies relocate. And when they do, the electoral votes follow them.
✨ Don't miss: Why Wandsworth Prison London UK Is Currently One Of Britain's Most Controversial Sites
California is still the king of the hill with 54 votes. But here's the kicker: it actually lost a vote for the first time in history after 2020. On the flip side, Texas is a massive gainer, sitting at 40 votes.
The Heavy Hitters (20+ Votes)
- California: 54 votes (The ultimate prize, even if it’s shrinking slightly).
- Texas: 40 votes (Rapidly catching up to California).
- Florida: 30 votes (A consistent gainer in recent decades).
- New York: 28 votes (Used to be the biggest; now firmly in fourth).
- Illinois: 19 votes.
- Pennsylvania: 19 votes.
Mid-Sized Powerhouses (10-18 Votes)
Ohio holds 17 votes, while Georgia and North Carolina are tied at 16. Michigan has 15, and New Jersey follows with 14. Virginia sits at 13. Washington has 12. Arizona, Indiana, Massachusetts, and Tennessee all share 11 votes. Rounding out this group are Colorado, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, each carrying 10 votes.
The Small But Mighty (3-9 Votes)
Alabama and South Carolina have 9. Kentucky, Louisiana, and Oregon each have 8. Connecticut and Oklahoma carry 7. Then you have a group of "sixers": Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Mississippi, Nevada, and Utah. Nebraska and New Mexico have 5.
There's a bunch of states with 4: Hawaii, Idaho, Maine, Montana, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and West Virginia.
Finally, the "Three-Vote Club" includes Alaska, Delaware, District of Columbia, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming. Even if nobody lived there, they’d still get three. That’s the law.
Why the Numbers Keep Shifting
You might've noticed that some states feel like they’re losing "clout." That’s because the House of Representatives is capped at 435 seats. It's a zero-sum game. If Florida grows fast enough to earn a new seat, that seat has to come from somewhere else—usually the "Rust Belt" or the Northeast.
📖 Related: Thomas Massie: Why Kentucky’s Most High IQ Representative is So Controversial
Think of it like a pie that never gets bigger, just sliced differently every decade.
For the most recent shift that we'll see in the 2024 and 2028 cycles, Texas added two votes. Florida, North Carolina, Colorado, Oregon, and Montana each picked up one. Who paid for it? California, New York, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, and West Virginia all saw their tallies drop by one.
The Maine and Nebraska Exception
Most states are "winner-take-all." If you win California by one single vote, you get all 54. It’s brutal but efficient.
But Maine and Nebraska are the rebels. They use a "congressional district" method. They give two votes to the statewide winner and then one vote to the winner of each individual congressional district. This is why you sometimes see a tiny blue dot in a sea of red in Nebraska, or a red dot in Maine. It’s one of the few ways a candidate can "chip away" at a state they can’t win entirely.
What Most People Miss About the Math
The number of electoral votes isn't random. It’s your two Senators plus your number of Representatives.
$Electoral Votes = Senators (2) + Representatives (n)$
Because every state gets two Senators regardless of size, the smallest states actually have more "voting power" per person. In Wyoming, one electoral vote represents roughly 190,000 people. In California, one vote represents over 700,000 people. Depending on who you ask, this is either a brilliant way to protect small states or a total glitch in democracy.
Actionable Steps for Voters
If you want to see how your specific state’s influence has changed over time, here is what you should do:
🔗 Read more: Hae Min Lee and Adnan Syed: What Most People Get Wrong
- Check the 2020 Census Reapportionment: Look at the official Census Bureau data to see exactly how much population your state gained or lost relative to others.
- Monitor Local Redistricting: Electoral votes are tied to congressional districts. The way your state draws its internal lines (gerrymandering or independent commissions) changes how those district-level votes (in ME and NE) or future representation is shaped.
- Calculate Your "Voter Power": Divide your state's population by its number of electoral votes. It’s a fun, if slightly depressing, way to see how much your individual ballot "weighs" in the grand scheme of the Electoral College.
- Follow Migration Trends: Watch moving company reports (like United Van Lines) or U-Haul data. These are often early indicators of which states will gain or lose electoral votes in the 2030 Census.
The map is never static. By the time we hit the 2032 election, these numbers will change all over again.