You’d think the answer is a simple eight years. Two terms, right? That’s what we’re taught in grade school, and for the most part, it’s how American history has played out since the mid-20th century. But if you actually dig into the U.S. Constitution—specifically the 22nd Amendment—the reality of how long can a person be president is a bit more flexible than a standard two-term limit.
There is a specific scenario where someone could technically serve for ten years.
It’s a quirk of constitutional law that feels like a trivia question, but it’s rooted in the very real chaos of presidential succession. If a Vice President takes over for a sitting president who can't finish their term, those "extra" years don't always count against their own limit. It depends entirely on the math.
The Ghost of George Washington’s Two-Term Tradition
For over a century, the limit on how long a person could stay in the White House wasn't a law. It was just a vibe. George Washington, exhausted by the infighting of his cabinet and the weight of a new nation, decided two terms were plenty. He stepped down in 1797, setting a massive precedent.
Every president who followed him—Jefferson, Madison, Monroe—respected the invisible "Washington Rule." They felt that staying longer would look too much like a monarchy. We’d just fought a war to get away from a king; nobody wanted a "President for Life."
Then came 1940.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt looked at the world falling apart during the Great Depression and the looming threat of World War II and decided the rules didn't apply to him. He ran for a third term. He won. Then he ran for a fourth. He died in office shortly after his fourth inauguration, having served over 12 years.
Congress panicked. They realized that if a president was popular enough, they could effectively hold power until they died. By 1947, they proposed the 22nd Amendment to ensure that no one could ever follow in FDR’s footsteps again. It was ratified in 1951, and it changed the presidency forever.
🔗 Read more: Elecciones en Honduras 2025: ¿Quién va ganando realmente según los últimos datos?
How long can a person be president? Breaking down the 10-year maximum
The 22nd Amendment is surprisingly specific. It says no person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice. But the "fine print" covers what happens if you weren't elected, but inherited the job.
If a Vice President (or anyone else in the line of succession) takes over and serves two years or less of the previous president's term, that time is essentially "free." It doesn't count toward their two-term limit. They can still run for two full four-year terms of their own.
$2 \text{ (partial term)} + 4 \text{ (first elected term)} + 4 \text{ (second elected term)} = 10 \text{ years}$
However, if they take over and serve more than two years of the predecessor’s term, they are only allowed to be elected one more time. In that case, their maximum stay would be somewhere between six and eight years.
Why hasn't anyone done the full decade?
Since the 22nd Amendment passed, we haven't seen the "ten-year president" in action. Lyndon B. Johnson came the closest. When JFK was assassinated in November 1963, LBJ took the oath of office. Because there were only about 14 months left in Kennedy’s term (which is less than two years), LBJ was legally eligible to run for two full terms of his own.
He won big in 1964. He could have run again in 1968. If he had run and won, he would have served roughly nine years and two months.
He didn't.
💡 You might also like: Trump Approval Rating State Map: Why the Red-Blue Divide is Moving
Vietnam and declining popularity pushed him to announce he wouldn't seek reelection. Since then, most "accidental" presidents like Gerald Ford haven't had the political capital or the timing to push the ten-year boundary. Ford took over for Nixon with more than two years left in the term, so he was only ever eligible for one more elected term anyway. He lost to Jimmy Carter in 1976, making the point moot.
The "Lame Duck" Problem and the 22nd Amendment
Some political scientists hate the 22nd Amendment. They argue that it creates a "lame duck" period where a president loses all their influence in their second term because everyone knows they're leaving. Why negotiate with a guy who’s gone in two years?
On the flip side, proponents argue it’s the only thing keeping the U.S. from sliding into an autocracy. Without it, popular figures like Ronald Reagan or Bill Clinton might have tried for a third term. Polls at the time suggested they both might have had a shot.
What about the 12th Amendment loophole?
There is a weird, nerdy legal theory involving the 12th Amendment. The 12th says that no person "constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President."
Does this mean a two-term former president (like Obama or Bush) could be someone's Vice President?
If the 22nd Amendment only says you can't be elected more than twice, some argue you could still inherit the office via the Vice Presidency. Most constitutional scholars, however, think this is a reach. They argue that "ineligible" means you can't hold the job, period. If it ever actually happened, the Supreme Court would have a massive headache trying to settle it.
The Reality of Term Limits Today
Currently, the term limit is one of the few things both parties mostly agree on, even if they complain about it when "their" president is popular. It’s a hard cap.
📖 Related: Ukraine War Map May 2025: Why the Frontlines Aren't Moving Like You Think
- Maximum elected terms: 2
- Maximum total years: 10 (under specific succession circumstances)
- Minimum age to serve: 35
- Residency requirement: 14 years within the U.S.
It is worth noting that these rules only apply to the Presidency. There are no federal term limits for Senators or Representatives. A person could theoretically spend 50 years in Congress—and many have—but the White House remains a revolving door by design.
Actionable Insights for Following Presidential Cycles
Understanding the limits of executive power helps you navigate the "horse race" of election season with a bit more clarity.
Track the Succession Clock
If a President leaves office mid-term, look at the calendar. If there are more than two years left (731 days or more), the person taking over is limited to one more term. If it’s 730 days or less, they have the "10-year" potential. This drastically changes how donors and parties view a new President.
Watch for 22nd Amendment Challenges
Occasionally, you'll hear talk about repealing the 22nd Amendment. This usually happens when a sitting president is very popular. Understand that repealing an amendment is incredibly difficult—it requires a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate, or a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of State Legislatures. It's not something that happens because of a tweet or a single news cycle.
Differentiate Between Eligibility and Tradition
Don't confuse "can't run" with "won't run." Political exhaustion is real. Even if the law allows for a certain amount of time, the physical and mental toll of the office often dictates the length of a presidency more than the Constitution does.
The 22nd Amendment serves as a permanent brake on executive ambition. It ensures that no matter how much a segment of the population loves a leader, the system eventually forces a refresh. Whether you think that's a safeguard for democracy or a limit on the voters' will, it remains the definitive answer to how long anyone gets to sit behind the Resolute Desk.
To get a better sense of how these rules apply in real-time, you can review the full text of the 22nd Amendment via the National Constitution Center. Staying informed on these technicalities is the best way to cut through the noise of political commentary during election years.