Ever had that moment where someone asks what you do, and you just sort of... freeze? It’s a standard icebreaker at parties. "So, what’s your deal?" or the classic "How do you define yourself?" Usually, we pivot straight to our job titles. I’m a lawyer. I’m a barista. I’m a software engineer. But then you lose the job, or you retire, or the industry shifts, and suddenly that definition feels like a suit that’s three sizes too small. Honestly, the way we've been taught to answer this question is kinda broken. We lean on external labels because they’re easy, but they are also incredibly fragile.
Most people treat their identity like a static snapshot. They think it's a fixed point in time. It isn't.
Why Your Job Is a Terrible Way to Define Yourself
We live in a culture obsessed with productivity. Because of that, we’ve outsourced our sense of self to our employers. Dr. Brian Robinson, an author and professor at UNC Charlotte, has spent years looking at how "workaholism" and professional identity merge. He’s noted that when your self-worth is tied exclusively to your output, you’re basically living on a psychological fault line. If the market dips, your identity crumbles. It’s risky.
Think about the "Great Resignation" or the massive tech layoffs of 2023 and 2024. Thousands of people who defined themselves as "Googlers" or "Meta employees" suddenly found themselves in an existential crisis. They weren't just losing a paycheck; they were losing their "who." If you aren't a Senior Project Manager anymore, who are you?
It’s better to look at traits. Are you a problem solver? A communicator? Someone who thrives in chaos? Those are portable. A job title is just a lease on a piece of identity that you don't actually own.
The Problem With Labels
Labels are shortcuts. They help other people categorize us quickly so they can move on with their day. "Oh, he's a marathon runner," or "She’s a mom." While these things are true, they are also incomplete. Social psychologist Tajfel’s Social Identity Theory suggests we naturally group ourselves to feel a sense of belonging. That’s fine, but the danger starts when the group's definition replaces your own internal compass.
You aren't just one thing. You're a messy, vibrating collection of contradictions. You can be a disciplined athlete who also loves greasy pizza. You can be a high-powered executive who spends weekends knitting. When you try to define yourself through a single lens, you end up cropping out the most interesting parts of the photo.
Values: The Stuff That Actually Sticks
If you want a definition that doesn't expire, you have to look at values. This isn't corporate HR talk. It’s about what actually makes you tick when nobody is watching.
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) emphasizes "valued living." Researchers like Steven C. Hayes argue that values aren't goals. A goal is something you cross off a list, like "buying a house." A value is a direction, like "being a supportive partner." You never "finish" being supportive. It's a constant.
💡 You might also like: Human DNA Found in Hot Dogs: What Really Happened and Why You Shouldn’t Panic
How do you define yourself through values? You ask what you’d stand for if you lost everything else. If you lost your money, your home, and your social standing, what remains?
- Maybe it’s curiosity.
- Could be resilience.
- Or maybe it’s just being the person who makes others feel seen.
These things are bulletproof. No one can fire you from being curious. No recession can take away your kindness. It sounds a bit "woo-woo," I know, but from a psychological standpoint, it’s the only foundation that actually holds up under pressure.
The Role of Narrative Identity
There’s this concept in psychology called "Narrative Identity." It was pioneered largely by Dan McAdams at Northwestern University. The idea is that we define ourselves by the stories we tell about our lives. We take the random, chaotic events of our existence and weave them into a plot.
Are you the hero who overcame the odds? Or are you the victim of a series of unfortunate events?
The wild thing is that the "truth" of the events matters less than the tone of the story. Two people can experience the exact same car accident. One defines themselves as a "survivor" who realized how precious life is. The other defines themselves as "unlucky" and lives in fear.
When you ask, "how do you define yourself," you’re really asking, "what story am I telling?" If your story is always about what people did to you, your identity is reactive. If your story is about how you responded to those things, your identity is proactive. You get to be the author, even if you don't control the setting or the other characters.
Reframing the Past
You've probably got some "cringe" moments in your history. We all do. Defining yourself doesn't mean ignoring those parts. It means integrating them.
The most resilient people don't have "clean" pasts. They have integrated pasts. They see their failures not as stains, but as data points. "I am someone who failed at a business and learned that I value stability more than I thought." That’s a much stronger definition than "I am a failure."
📖 Related: The Gospel of Matthew: What Most People Get Wrong About the First Book of the New Testament
Social Media and the "Profile" Trap
We’ve got a massive problem today: the curated self.
Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok—they all demand a bio. They want you to boil your entire human existence down to 150 characters and some emojis. This is the "Profile Trap." We start to believe our own marketing. We spend so much time polishing the digital avatar that we forget the person behind the screen is allowed to be unfinished.
Social media forces us to be "on brand." But humans aren't brands. Brands are consistent, predictable, and boring. Humans are allowed to change their minds. You can define yourself as an environmentalist today and realize tomorrow that you need to learn more about nuclear energy. That’s not "off-brand," that’s growth.
Don't let a character limit define the scope of your soul. Honestly, if you can fit your entire identity into a Twitter bio, you might need to broaden your horizons a bit.
Practical Steps to Redefine Your "Who"
Defining yourself isn't a one-and-done exercise. It’s more like a software update. You’ve gotta run it every once in a while to make sure the system isn't glitching.
Stop asking "Who am I?" and start asking "What do I care about right now?"
The first question is too big. It’s heavy. The second one is manageable. It acknowledges that you are a work in progress.
Audit your influences.
Who are you hanging out with? James Clear, the Atomic Habits guy, often talks about how our environment shapes our identity. If you’re surrounded by people who only value status, you’ll define yourself by status. If you’re around people who value craft, you’ll define yourself by what you create. Check your circle.
Write your own "About Me" without mentioning your job or family.
Try it. It’s hard. If you can’t mention your career or your role as a parent/spouse, what’s left? Usually, you’ll find the "raw" you—the person who likes the smell of rain, the person who gets fired up about social justice, the person who secretly loves 80s synth-pop. That’s the core.
👉 See also: God Willing and the Creek Don't Rise: The True Story Behind the Phrase Most People Get Wrong
Embrace the "I Don't Know" phase.
If you’re in a transition—divorce, career change, moving cities—it’s okay to have a blurry definition. In biology, there’s a stage called "liminality." It’s the space between. The caterpillar is basically soup inside the chrysalis before it becomes a butterfly. It’s not a caterpillar anymore, but it’s not a butterfly yet. It’s just soup. It’s okay to be soup for a while.
Moving Toward a Dynamic Identity
The goal isn't to find a perfect definition and stick to it forever. The goal is to develop a "fluid identity."
The philosopher Alan Watts used to talk about how we try to "pin down" life, like pinning a butterfly to a board. Once you pin it, it’s dead. Life is movement. Identity is movement.
How you define yourself at 22 should be drastically different from how you define yourself at 42. If it’s not, you’ve stopped paying attention. You are a process, not a product.
Instead of a noun, try being a verb. Instead of "I am a writer," try "I am writing." Instead of "I am a runner," try "I am running." It shifts the focus from a static state to an active engagement with the world. This makes you much more resilient to the "slings and arrows" of life. When you are a verb, you can just keep moving.
Start by identifying three core values that have remained consistent for the last five years. Write them down. Then, look at your current daily schedule. If "creativity" is a core value but you haven't made anything in six months, there’s a disconnect. Closing that gap is how you start living a life that feels authentic to your definition.
Next, pay attention to your "Internal Monologue."
When you mess up, do you say "I am an idiot" or "I did something idiotic"? The first is an identity statement. The second is a behavior statement. Shift your language to protect your core self from your temporary mistakes.
Finally, seek out "Awe."
Research from UC Berkeley’s Greater Good Science Center shows that experiencing awe—like looking at the stars or a massive canyon—shrinks the ego. When the "self" feels smaller, it actually feels more connected to everything else. Paradoxically, the best way to define yourself is to realize you are part of something much larger than your own biography.