Imagine walking into a doctor's office with a crushing case of anxiety or perhaps a "difficult" personality, and leaving with your brain's connection to your emotions permanently severed by a common kitchen tool. It sounds like a low-budget horror flick. But for thousands of people in the mid-20th century, this was cutting-edge medicine. To understand how did lobotomies work, you have to look past the gore and into a period of medical history defined by desperation, ego, and a total lack of pharmaceutical alternatives.
Psychiatric wards in the 1930s were nightmare fuel. Overcrowded. Violent. Smelling of despair. Doctors were drowning in patients they couldn't help, so when a "surgical" fix appeared, they clung to it like a life raft. It wasn't about "curing" the mind in the way we think of therapy today; it was about managing behavior. It was about turning a screaming, suffering human being into a quiet, manageable one.
The Brutal Logic of Disconnection
At its core, the lobotomy was based on a surprisingly simple—and ultimately flawed—theory of brain architecture. Egas Moniz, the Portuguese neurologist who won a Nobel Prize for this (yes, really), believed that mental illnesses like depression and schizophrenia were caused by "fixed ideas" that became physically stuck in the brain's neural pathways.
He figured if you just cut those wires, the thoughts couldn't loop anymore.
✨ Don't miss: Why Is Everybody Always Picking on Me? Understanding Social Friction and Personal Perception
But how did lobotomies work in a physical sense? Initially, Moniz used a technique called a leucotomy. He would drill holes into the skull—one on each side—and inject pure alcohol directly into the frontal lobes to destroy the white matter. When that proved a bit too imprecise, he switched to a tool called a leucotome, which featured a retractable wire loop. He’d stick it in, deploy the wire, and rotate it to core out cylinders of brain tissue.
It was essentially a biological "reset" button hit with a sledgehammer. The frontal lobes are the seat of our personality, our foresight, and our complex emotions. By severing the connection between these lobes and the rest of the brain (specifically the thalamus), doctors weren't removing the illness. They were removing the patient's ability to feel the illness—or much of anything else.
Walter Freeman and the Rise of the Ice Pick
If Moniz was the architect, Walter Freeman was the evangelist. Freeman wasn't even a surgeon; he was a neurologist. But he was impatient. He found the drilling and the operating rooms too slow for the "mental health crisis" he wanted to solve. He wanted something fast. Something he could do in a regular office or even a back room.
He found his inspiration in the work of an Italian doctor named Amarro Fiamberti, who had accessed the brain through the eye sockets. Freeman practiced on a grapefruit. Then he practiced on cadavers. Eventually, he realized that the thin bone at the top of the eye socket—the orbital plate—could be easily pierced.
The Transorbital Procedure
This is the "ice pick lobotomy" that haunts popular culture. Freeman literally grabbed a tool from his kitchen drawer to refine the process. He would knock the patient out using electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), essentially causing a grand mal seizure to act as anesthesia.
While the patient was unconscious, he’d peel back the eyelid. He’d place the sharp point of the orbitoclast against the bone and tap it with a mallet. Crunch. Once the tool was about two inches deep into the frontal lobe, he would swing it back and forth to shred the white matter. He’d repeat it on the other eye. Total time? About ten minutes. No stitches. No hospital stay. Freeman even had a "Lobotomobile"—a van he used to travel across the country, performing these procedures at state hospitals like a morbid traveling salesman.
He once performed 25 lobotomies in a single day at a West Virginia hospital. It was assembly-line brain surgery.
What Actually Happened to the Patients?
The results were... mixed. And "mixed" is being generous.
🔗 Read more: Does Thyroid Cause Tiredness? Why Your Labs Look Normal But You’re Still Exhausted
Proponents pointed to patients who had been catatonic or violently suicidal suddenly becoming "calm." In the eyes of a 1940s asylum director, a patient who sits quietly in a chair and stares at a wall for twelve hours is a "success." They no longer required expensive one-on-one care. They didn't fight the staff.
But the cost was the soul.
Take the case of Rosemary Kennedy, the sister of JFK. She was described as "rebellious" and prone to mood swings. Her father, Joe Kennedy, took her to Freeman in 1941. How did lobotomies work for her? It left her with the mental capacity of a two-year-old. She couldn't speak. She lost control of her bladder. She spent the rest of her life hidden away in institutions.
Others became "living ghosts." They lost their "affect"—that spark that makes a person them. They might remember their name or how to eat, but their drive, their creativity, and their ability to plan for the future were gone. Some died of brain hemorrhages. Others developed severe epilepsy.
The Strange Statistics of "Success"
Freeman claimed high success rates, but his data was incredibly biased. He followed up with patients by asking their families if they were "better." If the family said the patient was easier to live with because they didn't argue anymore, Freeman checked the "Improved" box.
✨ Don't miss: BMI for Seniors Calculator: Why the Standard Numbers Might Be Wrong for You
- About 30% of patients showed some symptomatic relief but stayed in institutions.
- About 30% were able to go home but required constant supervision.
- The rest were either unchanged, severely disabled, or dead.
Why Did the Medical Community Allow This?
It’s easy to look back and call these doctors monsters. Some arguably were. But the real answer is more complicated. Before Thorazine (the first "chemical lobotomy") was introduced in 1954, there was nothing. No Prozac. No Xanax. No effective antipsychotics.
Psychiatrists were desperate. They were watching people rot in padded cells for decades. In that context, a ten-minute procedure that offered even a 10% chance of "calm" seemed like a miracle.
There was also a massive gender and social bias. A huge number of lobotomy recipients were women who were deemed "hysterical" or "promiscuous." If a woman didn't want to be a submissive housewife, a lobotomy was seen as a way to "fix" her attitude. It was a tool of social control disguised as medical progress.
The End of an Era
The lobotomy didn't die out because of an ethical epiphany. It died because of big pharma. When Chlorpromazine (Thorazine) hit the market, it did what the ice pick did, but without the permanent brain damage. You could give a patient a pill and they would calm down. If the dose was wrong, you could change it. You couldn't "un-swish" an ice pick in someone's brain.
By the late 50s, the procedure was largely discredited. Freeman, however, never stopped believing. He performed his last lobotomy in 1967. The patient, Helen Mortensen, died of a brain hemorrhage. The hospital finally revoked his surgical privileges, and the era of the "ice pick" was officially over.
Actionable Insights: Learning From the Past
Understanding the history of the lobotomy isn't just about morbid curiosity. It’s a case study in medical ethics and the dangers of "easy" fixes for complex problems. Here is what we can take away from this dark chapter:
- Question "Miracle" Cures: Whenever a medical procedure or supplement claims to solve complex psychological issues with a "quick fix," look for the long-term data. The lobotomy was popular because it was fast, not because it was better.
- The Importance of Informed Consent: Most lobotomy patients didn't know what was happening to them, and their families were often misled about the risks. Today, patient advocacy and clear communication of side effects are non-negotiable.
- Mental Health is Physical: While the lobotomy was barbaric, it did highlight that the mind is rooted in the physical structures of the brain. Modern neurology and targeted treatments like Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) are the ethical descendants of this realization, focusing on precision rather than destruction.
- Ethics Over Efficiency: The lobotomy flourished because it made hospitals more efficient, not because it made patients' lives better. We must always prioritize the quality of life of the individual over the convenience of the institution.
If you are researching this for a historical project or because of a family story, the best next step is to look into the National Archives of Medical History or read "My Lobotomy" by Howard Dully. Dully was lobotomized at age 12 by Freeman and lived to tell his story, providing one of the few first-hand accounts of what it's like to survive the procedure. His journey of reclaiming his life offers a powerful counter-narrative to the "manageable patient" myth.