Walk into any department store in December and you'll see him. The big guy. Red suit, white beard, twinkling eyes, and a belt buckle that looks like it could double as a dinner plate. Most people think Santa Claus Coca-Cola ads are where this image started.
It’s a common bit of trivia. You’ve probably heard it at a holiday party: "Actually, Coca-Cola invented the modern Santa."
Except, they didn't.
That’s the weird part about history. The truth is usually a lot more layered than a marketing slogan. While the beverage giant definitely didn't "invent" the man in the red suit, they did something arguably more powerful. They standardized him. They took a mythological figure that was frankly a bit creepy in some iterations and turned him into a global celebrity who looks like your favorite uncle.
The Myth of the Blue Santa
Before we get into Haddon Sundblom—the artist who basically defined the 20th-century aesthetic of the holidays—we have to clear up the "Blue Santa" rumor. People love to say that before Coke got their hands on him, Santa wore blue, green, or even tan.
That’s partially true.
In the 1800s, St. Nick was a bit of a chameleon. Thomas Nast, the famous cartoonist for Harper’s Weekly, drew Santa in all sorts of colors. Nast is actually the one who gave us the North Pole and the workshop. But by the time Coke entered the scene in the 1930s, the red suit was already the front-runner. The company didn't change his color to match their logo; they just picked the version that was already winning and poured millions of dollars into making it the only version anyone remembered.
Marketing is funny that way. It doesn't always invent things from scratch. Often, it just takes a messy reality and makes it consistent.
Enter Haddon Sundblom
In 1931, the Archie Shea agency (working for Coke) wanted a campaign that showed Santa as a "wholesome" figure. They hired an illustrator named Haddon Sundblom.
Sundblom was a genius. He didn't look at Santa as a cartoon. He looked at him as a person.
For his first few paintings, Sundblom actually used a friend of his, a retired salesman named Lou Prentiss, as his model. Prentiss had the perfect look—the "laugh lines" and the natural warmth. When Prentiss eventually passed away, Sundblom started using his own reflection in the mirror to paint the character. Honestly, if you look at photos of Sundblom, he kind of looked like Santa himself.
These paintings weren't just ads. They were oil paintings. They had texture, light, and a sense of "realness" that 1930s America desperately needed during the Great Depression. This wasn't a scary saint who judged you. This was a guy who took his boots off and raided the fridge for a snack.
Why the 1930s mattered
Context is everything. You have to remember that back then, soda was seen as a "summer" drink. When the temperature dropped, sales tanked. The whole Santa Claus Coca-Cola partnership was a calculated business move to convince people that cold bubbles were just as good in a snowstorm as they were in July.
"Thirst knows no season."
That was the tagline. It’s simple. It’s effective. It changed the entire business model of the beverage industry.
The Details Everyone Misses
If you look closely at the old Sundblom paintings, there are these tiny human touches that make the "Coke Santa" feel different from the versions that came before.
- The Belt: In several ads, Santa’s belt is backwards. Sundblom was painting his own reflection, and he occasionally forgot to flip the buckle in the final version.
- The Dogs: There are often dogs in the paintings. They aren't "brand" dogs. They’re just... dogs. One was a neighborhood poodle; another was a stray. It added to the "everyman" vibe.
- The Interaction: Unlike the stern St. Nicholas of European folklore, the Coke Santa interacted with children. He was caught in the act. He was relatable.
There's a specific painting from 1961 where Santa is trying to quiet a family dog so he doesn't wake the kids while he's stealing a Coke from the fridge. It’s a narrative. It’s a story told in a single frame. That's why these images stuck. They weren't just selling a product; they were selling a feeling of "mischievous joy."
The Global Standardization
By the 1950s, the Santa Claus Coca-Cola version of the character was being exported everywhere. This is where the "cultural imperialism" argument usually starts.
In many parts of the world, Christmas traditions were radically different. You had Sinterklaas in the Netherlands, Father Christmas in the UK, and various other iterations across Europe and Latin America. But the "Sundblom Santa" was so visually dominant that he started to overwrite local traditions.
Is that a bad thing? It depends on who you ask.
From a business perspective, it’s one of the most successful branding exercises in human history. Coca-Cola managed to align their brand with the concept of "happiness" and "family" so tightly that it’s almost impossible to untangle them now. Even if you hate soda, you probably have a positive subconscious reaction to that specific shade of red and white during December.
The Polar Bears and the Modern Era
As the decades rolled on, the brand had to evolve. In the 90s, we got the "Always Coca-Cola" campaign and the introduction of the CGI polar bears.
But notice what stayed.
Even with high-tech graphics and massive budgets, the company keeps coming back to the Sundblom aesthetic. They use his original oil paintings on cans even today. They know that you can’t beat nostalgia. In 2026, we’re seeing a massive resurgence in "vintage" holiday aesthetics because people are tired of the polished, sterile look of modern AI-generated art. They want the brushstrokes. They want the "Lou Prentiss" face.
✨ Don't miss: Medium Long Wavy Hair Is the Only Low-Maintenance Choice That Actually Looks Expensive
What This Means for Brands Today
There’s a lesson here that goes beyond Christmas.
If you want to build a brand that lasts a century, you don't do it by shouting about your features. You do it by attaching yourself to an existing cultural emotion. Coca-Cola didn't own Christmas, but they became the "official sponsor" of it by being consistent.
They showed up every year.
They kept the same "look."
They prioritized emotion over "selling."
Actionable Steps for Exploring This History
If you're a fan of history or just want to see the evolution for yourself, there are a few things you should actually do rather than just reading about it.
- Visit the World of Coca-Cola in Atlanta: They have a dedicated gallery for the Haddon Sundblom originals. Seeing the actual oil on canvas is a completely different experience than seeing a pixelated version on your phone. You can see the mistakes, the texture, and the scale.
- Check out the Library of Congress Digital Collections: Search for Thomas Nast’s illustrations from the 1860s. Compare them to the 1931 Sundblom debut. You’ll see exactly what Coke "borrowed" and what they "invented." It’s a fascinating study in visual evolution.
- Audit Your Own Holiday Traditions: Take a look at the decorations in your house. How many of them follow the "red suit, white fur, black belt" template? It’s a fun way to see how much a 100-year-old ad campaign still influences your living room.
- Look for the "Backwards Belt" in Vintage Ads: If you can find old National Geographic magazines from the 40s or 50s in a thrift store, flip to the back covers. Searching for the artist's "reflection errors" is like a historical version of Where’s Waldo?
The story of the Santa Claus Coca-Cola connection isn't a conspiracy about a company "owning" a holiday. It’s a story about how art, when backed by a massive budget and a clear vision, can actually change the way a whole species visualizes a myth. It’s about the power of consistency.
Santa might not be "real," but the impact that those 1930s paintings had on our collective imagination is as real as it gets.
Key Reference Points for Further Research:
- Haddon Sundblom (1899–1976), American Illustrator.
- Thomas Nast, Political Cartoonist for Harper's Weekly.
- "A Visit from St. Nicholas" (Clement Clarke Moore, 1823).
- The Coca-Cola Company Archives, Atlanta, GA.