Honestly, it’s rare to see a movie get trashed by critics while being absolutely binged by everyone else. But that’s exactly what happened with the hillbillies movie JD Vance executive produced—you probably know it as Hillbilly Elegy. Released on Netflix in late 2020, it didn’t just premiere; it exploded into a cultural firestorm that hasn't really cooled down, even years later. It’s got everything: A-list stars like Amy Adams and Glenn Close, a legendary director in Ron Howard, and a backstory that basically became a political playbook.
Most people coming to this movie today aren't just looking for a family drama. They’re looking for the origin story of a man who went from a "Never-Trump" commentator to the Vice President of the United States.
The gap between what critics saw and what the audience felt is massive. We're talking a 25% critic score versus an 83% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes. That’s not just a difference in taste; it’s a total breakdown in how we view class and "the American Dream" in this country.
The "Poverty Porn" Accusation vs. Real Life
If you read the reviews from places like The Atlantic or The AV Club, they didn't just dislike the movie. They hated it. They called it "bootstrapping poverty porn." The argument was that the film ignored the systems that keep people poor—like the hollowing out of manufacturing or the lack of healthcare—and instead blamed the people for their own struggles.
But then you talk to people who actually grew up in the Rust Belt or Appalachia.
💡 You might also like: Why This Is How We Roll FGL Is Still The Song That Defines Modern Country
For them, seeing Glenn Close as "Mamaw" wasn't a caricature; it was a mirror. Close actually wore a prosthetic nose and used Vance's real family photos to get the look right. She was so convincing that she managed the rare (and slightly awkward) feat of being nominated for an Oscar and a Razzie for the exact same role. That’s Hollywood for you.
Why the Critics Went So Hard
- The Timing: It came out right around the 2020 election. People were already on edge.
- The "Bootstrap" Narrative: Critics felt the movie suggested that if JD could make it to Yale, anyone could—ignoring the luck and specific help he had.
- The Director: Ron Howard is known for being "nice" and "commercial." Many felt he was too soft on the darker, more systemic roots of the story.
From Netflix Hit to Political Weapon
The weirdest part about the hillbillies movie JD Vance is how it changed JD himself. According to reports from The Wrap, Vance was actually "personally wounded" by how the media treated the film. He’d spent years as the "liberal-friendly" interpreter of the white working class, but when the movie came out, that same crowd turned on him.
Some insiders say this was the tipping point.
Vance allegedly felt that if Hollywood and the "elites" were going to hate his family's story, he didn't need them anyway. He leaned harder into the MAGA movement, eventually winning a Senate seat in Ohio and then landing the VP slot on the 2024 ticket. It’s a classic "villain origin story" if you're a Democrat, or a "hero's awakening" if you're a Republican.
📖 Related: The Real Story Behind I Can Do Bad All by Myself: From Stage to Screen
What Really Happened in Middletown?
The movie focuses on Vance’s childhood in Middletown, Ohio, and his family's roots in Jackson, Kentucky. It’s a messy, non-linear story. One minute you’re watching Gabriel Basso (as adult JD) trying to nail a summer internship interview at a fancy law firm, and the next you're flashing back to Amy Adams (as his mother, Bev) struggling with addiction.
The "86-dollar calculator" scene is probably the one most people remember.
Mamaw has to beg for extra food from the Meals-on-Wheels guy just so JD can have the calculator he needs for school. It’s a gut-punch. It shows the razor-thin margin between surviving and failing. Critics called it melodramatic, but for a lot of people living paycheck to paycheck, that's just Tuesday.
Real-Life Characters vs. Movie Versions
- Mamaw (Bonnie Vance): The backbone. In real life, she was a tough-as-nails woman who once set her husband on fire for coming home drunk. The movie tones her down slightly, believe it or not.
- Bev Vance: JD's mom. The movie focuses heavily on her heroin addiction. In reality, she’s been sober for years now, which is a detail the movie mostly leaves for the end-credits text.
- Usha Vance: Played by Freida Pinto. She’s JD’s wife. In the film, she’s the "supportive partner" archetype, but in real life, she’s a high-flying lawyer who clerked for Supreme Court justices.
Is it Worth Watching Now?
If you want a nuanced documentary on Appalachian economics, this isn't it. But if you want to understand the cultural rift in America, it’s basically mandatory viewing.
👉 See also: Love Island UK Who Is Still Together: The Reality of Romance After the Villa
The movie doesn't solve anything. It doesn't explain how to fix the opioid crisis or bring back the steel mills. What it does do—fairly or not—is put a human face on a segment of the population that usually only gets talked about during election cycles.
It’s a "domestic drama" dressed up as "prestige cinema." It’s loud, it’s sweaty, and it’s deeply uncomfortable.
How to approach the movie today:
- Separate the Art from the Politician: Try to watch it as a story about a kid and his grandma, not a campaign ad. It's hard, but it helps.
- Watch the Performances: Whatever you think of the script, Amy Adams and Glenn Close are acting their hearts out.
- Check the Facts: Read the original book after. It has way more "policy talk" and "socioeconomic theory" that Ron Howard cut out to make it more of a "family movie."
The legacy of the hillbillies movie JD Vance is basically a Rorschach test. If you see a story of grit and personal triumph, you’re probably in the 83% audience bracket. If you see a tone-deaf exploitation of the poor that ignores the "why" of poverty, you’re with the critics.
Either way, the movie did its job: it made us talk. And in 2026, we’re still talking about it.
To get a better sense of the actual history versus the Hollywood version, you should look up the interviews JD Vance gave back in 2016 when the book first dropped. His tone back then was almost unrecognizable compared to his current political persona. Comparing those two versions of the same man is perhaps the most interesting "movie" of all.
Next Steps for Deepening Your Understanding:
- Compare the 2016 Fresh Air interview with JD Vance to his 2024 campaign speeches to see the rhetoric shift.
- Read "Appalachian Reckoning," a collection of essays written by people from the region who felt the movie/book misrepresented them.
- Watch Ron Howard’s 2024 interviews where he discusses his "disappointment" with Vance's political evolution.