It is early 2026, and the internet is still recovering from the seismic shift that was the 2025 release of James Gunn’s Superman. For over a decade, the image of the Man of Steel was synonymous with Henry Cavill’s chiseled, stoic, and often brooding silhouette. Then came David Corenswet.
The transition wasn't just a casting swap. It was a total ideological reboot that split the fandom right down the middle.
Honestly, comparing Henry Cavill and David Corenswet is like comparing a Wagnerian opera to a classic rock anthem. Both are "music," but they’re trying to make you feel very different things. While the "Snyder Bros" and the "Gunn Club" continue to duke it out on X (formerly Twitter), the reality of how these two men occupied the most famous cape in history is far more nuanced than a simple "who’s better" poll.
The "Aura" vs. The "Dork"
If you’ve spent any time on Reddit lately, you’ve seen the term "Auraman" thrown around. That’s the shorthand for Henry Cavill’s Superman. From the moment he landed in Man of Steel (2013), Cavill wasn't playing a guy from Kansas who happened to fly. He was playing a god among men.
Zack Snyder’s vision was operatic. He leaned into the religious allegory. Cavill’s Superman was a figure of myth, a lonely alien struggling with the weight of a world that feared him. He didn’t have much dialogue, but he didn't really need it. His presence—that massive, statue-like frame and those piercing eyes—did the talking.
Then you have David Corenswet.
👉 See also: Who Were The 3 Musketeers Names? The Real Men Behind Dumas' Legend
Corenswet’s Clark Kent in the 2025 film is... well, he’s kinda a dork. And that was the point. While Cavill’s Clark was often just Superman in a suit, Corenswet’s Clark is a distinct persona. Many fans pointed out he looks a bit like Moss from The IT Crowd when he’s at the Daily Planet. He’s awkward. He’s approachable.
The biggest shock for audiences was seeing a Superman who actually talks to people. Corenswet has more lines in the first forty minutes of Superman than Cavill had in entire movies. He’s sincere. He’s "super-woke" according to some critics because he focuses on being an immigrant and a helper rather than a weapon of mass destruction.
Power Scaling: Do You Want a God or a Guy?
One of the most controversial takes from the 2025 movie was how much Superman got his butt kicked.
In the Snyderverse, Cavill’s Superman was nearly invincible. He leveled Metropolis fighting Zod. He dragged ships through ice. When he fought, it looked like a natural disaster. He was the apex predator of the DC Universe.
Corenswet’s Superman is much more vulnerable.
In Gunn's film, we see him getting beaten by characters like Ultra-Man and even taking hits from the Engineer. He bleeds. He makes mistakes. To some fans, this felt "undignified." Why is the strongest man in the universe losing to Lex Luthor’s goons?
But that’s the "human" element Gunn was chasing. This Superman is less of an "event" (as Snyder described his version) and more of a person with a job to do. He’s less experienced. He’s figuring it out. While Cavill represented the "Super," Corenswet is leaning heavily into the "Man."
The Box Office Reality Check
Now that the dust has settled on the 2025 box office, we have some cold, hard numbers.
James Gunn’s Superman grossed about $617 million worldwide. It was the tenth highest-grossing film of 2025. By comparison, Cavill’s Man of Steel pulled in $670 million back in 2013.
If you adjust for inflation, the gap is actually pretty massive. Ticket prices in 2025 were significantly higher than in 2013. This means that, in terms of sheer numbers of people sitting in seats, more people went to see Henry Cavill’s debut than David Corenswet’s.
Why the discrepancy?
- Franchise Fatigue: By 2025, people were a bit tired of the "origin story" loop.
- Tonal Shift: The "sunny" disposition of the new DCU didn't immediately hook the fans who loved the dark, gritty era.
- The "Woke" Debate: There was a vocal segment of the audience that stayed away because they felt the film was too focused on social messaging rather than "punching things."
Still, the 2025 film was a hit with critics, holding an 83% on Rotten Tomatoes, while Man of Steel languished at 57%. It seems the critics wanted the heart, while the general audience still has a lingering thirst for the grit.
Life After the Cape: Cavill’s Grimdark Future
While Corenswet is busy filming the 2026 Supergirl cameo and preparing for the next DCU chapter, Henry Cavill has moved on to something arguably much bigger: Warhammer 40,000.
If you thought Superman was a big deal, the Warhammer project at Amazon is a different beast entirely. Cavill isn't just the star; he’s the executive producer. This is his "dream project."
As of January 2026, the news is a mix of "it’s happening" and "wait for it." Games Workshop CEO Kevin Rountree recently confirmed that we shouldn't expect the series until 2027 or 2028. Why? Because the scale is absurd. We’re talking about live-action Space Marines, Tyranids, and Chaos. Cavill is reportedly obsessed with "protecting the lore," which is a direct response to his departure from The Witcher.
Cavill is no longer interested in being the "corporate" hero. He’s building his own universe now. He’s swapping the red cape for power armor and a chainsword. And honestly? It suits him better. Cavill has always been a bit too "intense" for the boy-scout version of Superman. In the grim darkness of the far future, that intensity is exactly what’s required.
The Costume Clash
We have to talk about the trunks.
David Corenswet brought back the red trunks. It was a statement. It said, "We are done being embarrassed by the comics." The suit is bright, primary colors, and a bit baggy—modeled after the All-Star Superman aesthetic.
Cavill’s suit was a feat of engineering. It was metallic, textured, and alien. It didn't have trunks because, in 2013, Hollywood thought trunks were silly.
This minor detail actually summarizes the whole debate. Cavill’s suit was designed to look "cool" and "realistic" in a modern world. Corenswet’s suit was designed to look "friendly" and "hopeful," even if it looks a bit goofy.
What Actually Matters Moving Forward
If you’re looking for a winner, you won't find one.
The Henry Cavill era was a product of its time—the "Post-Dark Knight" era where everything had to be grounded and serious. He was a perfect Superman for that specific world. He gave us a mythic, powerful, and deeply misunderstood hero.
🔗 Read more: How Serial Changed Everything We Know About True Crime
David Corenswet is the Superman for the 2020s. He’s about empathy, mental health, and being a "good neighbor." He’s the hero you want to have a beer with, not the one you want to worship from afar.
Actionable Takeaways for the Fans:
- Appreciate the Multiverse: We are in an era where multiple versions of characters can exist. You don't have to hate one to love the other.
- Follow the Projects, Not the Brand: If you miss Cavill’s intensity, watch his Warhammer updates. If you love Gunn’s storytelling, keep an eye on the Supergirl movie and Lanterns series.
- Check the Sources: Don't get sucked into the "outrage" cycle on social media. Most of the "controversy" around the 2025 Superman was manufactured for clicks.
The cape is in good hands with Corenswet, but the legacy of what Cavill built—the "Auraman"—isn't going anywhere. It’s just moved from Metropolis to the 41st Millennium.
Next Steps: Keep an eye on Amazon Prime Video for the first official concept art from Cavill's Warhammer 40k project, likely dropping in late 2026. If you're following the new DCU, David Corenswet's next appearance is confirmed for a significant supporting role in Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow.