Ever heard of a guy who won the most prestigious award in children’s literature for a history book that basically told kids to "feel" the past rather than just memorize a bunch of dusty dates? That was Hendrik Willem van Loon.
Honestly, he was a bit of a giant. Literally. He stood over six feet tall and weighed nearly 300 pounds. He was this booming, eccentric Dutch-American who somehow managed to be a journalist, a historian, a radio star, and a personal friend to FDR all at the same time. You’ve probably seen his name on old, yellowing hardcovers in used bookstores—usually The Story of Mankind.
It’s the book that won the very first Newbery Medal back in 1922.
But here’s the thing. Van Loon wasn't your typical academic. He didn't care about "unassailable facts" as much as he cared about the vibe of history. He’d arrive at lectures at Cornell or Antioch and, instead of reading from a script, he’d pull out a massive pad of paper and start sketching. He thought if you couldn’t draw it, you didn't really get it.
The Man Behind the Sketches
Van Loon was born in Rotterdam in 1882. He moved to the U.S. around 1902 because, frankly, he didn't get along with his dad and wanted a fresh start. He hit up Cornell and Harvard, then went to Munich to get a Ph.D.
His dissertation? A book called The Fall of the Dutch Republic.
His professors weren't exactly thrilled. They thought his writing was too "flashy." Too readable. In the early 1900s, if you weren't being boring, you weren't being "scholarly." Van Loon basically told them to stuff it. He wanted to bring history to the masses, not just the guys in tweed jackets.
During World War I, he was a correspondent for the Associated Press. He saw the mess firsthand. That experience changed him. It made him realize that if we don't teach the next generation where we came from, we’re doomed to keep breaking things.
Why The Story of Mankind Exploded
By 1921, the world was reeling from the Great War. People wanted to understand how everything had fallen apart. Along comes Van Loon with this 500-page book that he wrote and illustrated himself.
He had this rule: "Have something to say, say it in as few words as possible, then stop talking."
👉 See also: Funny questions ask your friends: How to Kill the Awkward Silence Once and for All
He didn't just list kings. He wrote about the "human" part of the story. He’d talk about the invention of the steam engine or the way people in the Middle Ages actually felt about their homes. And the drawings! They weren't "fine art." They were more like editorial cartoons—messy, pen-and-ink sketches that made complex ideas like the Congress of Vienna look like a bunch of tired guys in a big room.
He used to tell teachers: "Let your boys and girls draw their history." He knew kids would remember a castle they drew themselves way longer than a photo they glanced at for five seconds.
Hendrik Willem van Loon and the Art of Being "Difficult"
If you think Van Loon was a saint, you’ve got the wrong guy. He was complicated. He was married three times (twice to the same woman, Eliza Helen Criswell). He was often broke, then suddenly rich, then broke again.
He was also an elitist in some ways. He’d write for "the masses" but sometimes looked down on them.
Critics today point out—and they aren't wrong—that his "world history" was very, very Eurocentric. He barely touched on Asia or Africa unless it intersected with Western interests. He used terms like "primitive" and "heathen" that make modern readers cringe. He was a product of the 1920s, with all the baggage that entails.
Yet, he was also one of the first people to use his platform to scream about the Nazis.
Standing Up to Hitler
In 1938, Van Loon wrote a book called Our Battle, which was a direct response to Hitler’s Mein Kampf. He didn't mince words. He called out the danger when most people were still trying to ignore it.
Because of this, the Nazis banned his books and wouldn't let him back into Germany.
He didn't stop. During World War II, he became "Oom Henk" (Uncle Hank) on shortwave radio. He’d broadcast anti-Nazi messages in Dutch to his occupied homeland. He was a one-man propaganda machine for the resistance. Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands even knighted him for it later.
What We Can Learn From Him Today
So, why should you care about a guy who died in 1944?
✨ Don't miss: Low protein wet cat food: What most people get wrong about kidney diets
Because Van Loon understood something we’re struggling with right now in the age of AI and endless info: Context matters more than data.
You can Google the date of the Battle of Waterloo in half a second. But Van Loon wanted you to understand the pressure on Napoleon’s shoulders. He wanted you to see the "leitmotif" of history—how names like Caesar became Kaiser and Czar.
He believed history was a process, not a list.
Takeaway Insights
If you want to read history—or write it—like Van Loon, here’s the "Uncle Hank" approach:
- Skip the boring stuff. If a detail doesn't change the course of civilization, leave it out.
- Visualise everything. If you can’t draw a diagram of how an idea works, you probably don't understand it well enough to explain it.
- Put yourself in the story. Van Loon wasn't afraid to say "I think" or "My grandfather told me." It makes the writing feel human.
- Be a "popularizer." Don't hide knowledge behind big words. Education is for everyone, not just the elite.
Next Steps for You
If you want to actually experience his style, don't just read about him. Go find a 1920s or 1930s edition of The Story of Mankind or The Arts. The original layouts and the way his sketches interact with the text are something digital versions often mess up. Look specifically for his "Maps of Time"—they’re weirdly brilliant. Check out his unfinished autobiography, Report to St. Peter, if you want to see how he viewed his own chaotic life as he was reaching the end of it.