You’re lying if you haven't felt it. That tiny, nagging itch at 10:00 PM on a Sunday. It isn't hunger. It's the Wordle reset. Or maybe it's the need to see if that one restaurant you love finally got panned by a critic who’s probably having a bad day. People joke about the "have to have NYT" phenomenon like it’s a cult, but for millions of us, it’s basically the digital version of morning coffee. You don't just read it; you inhabit it.
The New York Times isn't just a paper anymore. It’s a bundle of neuroses and triumphs.
Look, the media landscape is a total mess right now. Local papers are vanishing. Newsrooms are shrinking. Yet, somehow, The Gray Lady is out here thriving with over 10 million subscribers. Why? Because they realized something very smart: news is stressful, but games, recipes, and shopping advice are addictive. If you have to have NYT access, you probably aren't just there for the investigative reporting on international conflicts. You're there because you can't imagine a Tuesday without the Spelling Bee or a dinner party without a recipe that calls for precisely three types of shallots.
The Bundle Theory: Why You Feel Like You Have to Have NYT
Content is a commodity, but "the bundle" is a lifestyle. Back in the day, you’d get the physical paper tossed onto your driveway, and it was a singular experience. Now, it’s fragmented. You’ve got the core news, which is fine, but then you’ve got The Athletic for your sports fix, Wirecutter so you don’t buy a terrible toaster, and NYT Cooking which has basically replaced every physical cookbook in your kitchen.
It’s a psychological trap. A good one.
When you think about the phrase "have to have NYT," you're likely thinking about the social currency. If you aren't reading the same long-form piece on the housing market as your coworkers, you’re out of the loop. It creates this FOMO (fear of missing out) that other outlets haven't quite mastered. The Atlantic is great, but it doesn't have a crossword that makes you feel like a genius for knowing a five-letter word for "Egyptian deity."
The Wordle Effect and the Gamification of News
Let’s be real. A huge chunk of the recent surge in people saying they "have to have NYT" subscriptions came down to a five-letter word game. Josh Wardle sold his creation to the Times in early 2022 for a "low seven-figure" sum. At the time, people thought the Times was overpaying. They weren't. They were buying a gateway drug.
Wordle is the "hook." Once you're in the app to play Wordle, you see the headline about the election. Then you see a link to a Connections puzzle. Before you know it, you've spent forty minutes in the ecosystem. It's a masterclass in retention. You start for the game; you stay because you’ve become accustomed to the interface.
The games department is the secret sauce. While other news organizations were trying to figure out how to pivot to video (a disaster for most), the Times doubled down on puzzles. It’s low-cost, high-engagement content. It doesn't require a foreign correspondent in a war zone to maintain. It just needs a clever editor and a solid codebase.
📖 Related: Coach Bag Animal Print: Why These Wild Patterns Actually Work as Neutrals
The Cooking Cult and Wirecutter’s Grip
I have spent way too much money because of Wirecutter. Honestly, it’s a problem. But that’s the power of the brand. When we talk about why people feel they have to have NYT products, we’re talking about trust. In an era of AI-generated junk and "top 10" lists that are just Amazon affiliate dumps, Wirecutter actually tests things. They spend months on mattresses. They break vacuums so you don’t have to.
Then there's the food. NYT Cooking has turned "The Stew" (Alison Roman’s chickpea recipe) into a cultural moment. They didn't just publish a recipe; they created a shared experience.
- You buy the ingredients.
- You post the photo.
- You comment on the recipe (the comments section is a wild place, trust me).
The comment section on NYT Cooking is legendary. You’ll find people saying things like, "I didn't have chicken, so I used tofu, and I omitted the salt, and it was terrible. One star." It’s a community of perfectionists and chaos agents. And it's another reason people feel they have to have NYT in their daily rotation. It’s entertainment.
Is the High Cost Worth It?
Let’s talk money. Because it’s not cheap. A full-access subscription can run you a decent chunk of change every month once the "introductory offer" expires.
Is it actually worth it?
If you’re a casual reader, maybe not. But if you’re someone who uses the recipes three times a week, plays the games daily, and reads the deep-dive investigations, the cost per hour of entertainment is actually pretty low. Compare it to a Netflix sub where you spend forty minutes scrolling and never actually watch anything. With the Times, you’re always getting something "productive" or at least mentally stimulating.
There’s also the prestige factor. We don't like to admit it, but there is a certain level of social signaling involved. Carrying a physical Sunday edition or sharing an NYT link feels different than sharing a link from a random blog. It’s an institutional weight.
The Criticism: It’s Not All Sunshine
We have to be honest here. The "have to have NYT" sentiment isn't universal. There are plenty of people who find the paper’s editorial stance frustrating or its focus too "New York-centric." The "Pitchbot" Twitter account exists solely to mock the Times’ perceived habit of "both-sidesing" every issue to a fault.
👉 See also: Bed and Breakfast Wedding Venues: Why Smaller Might Actually Be Better
There's also the labor issue. The NYT Guild has had very public battles with management over pay and remote work. For a paper that reports heavily on labor rights, seeing their own staff on a picket line is... awkward. If you’re a conscious consumer, these things matter. You have to weigh the value of the content against the ethics of the corporation.
How to Get the Most Out of Your NYT Experience
If you’ve decided you absolutely have to have NYT access, don't just let the app sit there. Maximize the value.
- Gift Articles: Use your monthly quota of gift articles to send things to friends who are behind the paywall. It makes you look smart and helps them out.
- The "For You" Tab: This is actually pretty good. It learns what you like. If you hate sports, it’ll stop showing you The Athletic's takes on the NFL.
- Newsletters: "The Daily" is the obvious one, but "The Morning" by David Leonhardt is arguably the best-curated news summary in existence. It’s concise. It’s smart. It’s often better than the homepage.
- Archive Access: Most people forget they have access to the archives. You can go back and read articles from 1851. Want to see how they reported on the Titanic sinking? You can. It’s a historian’s dream.
Breaking the Paywall Habit
Sometimes, you just want to read one article. We’ve all been there. You click a link from Reddit or Twitter, and boom—the paywall hits.
There are "legal" ways to deal with this without a full sub. Many local libraries provide free digital access to the NYT if you have a library card. You just log in through their portal. It’s a bit clunkier, but it’s free. Also, if you’re a student or an educator, the discounts are massive. Don't pay full price if you don't have to.
The Future of the "Must-Have" Media
The New York Times is currently in its "Big Tech" era. They are acquiring companies, refining their data, and making sure you never have a reason to leave their app. They want to be the starting point for your day and the wind-down at the end of it.
They’ve moved beyond being a newspaper. They are a utility.
When a brand becomes a utility, the "have to have" becomes a reality. You don't "choose" to have water or electricity; you just have them. The Times is trying to reach that same status for your brain. Whether that's a good thing for the diversity of the media landscape is a different conversation, but for the individual user, it’s a compelling package.
Real-World Examples of the NYT Lifestyle
Take my friend Sarah. Sarah doesn't care about politics. She finds the news exhausting. But Sarah has a full NYT subscription. Why? Because she’s a marathon runner and The Athletic has the best coverage of her favorite teams, and she uses the Cooking app to meal prep. For her, the "news" is just a byproduct of her hobbies.
✨ Don't miss: Virgo Love Horoscope for Today and Tomorrow: Why You Need to Stop Fixing People
Then there’s Mark. Mark is a news junkie. He reads the "Paper of Record" to stay informed for his job in finance. He doesn't touch the games. He thinks the recipes are "pretentious."
The genius of the NYT is that it caters to both Sarah and Mark simultaneously. It’s a big tent.
How to Decide If You "Have to Have NYT"
Before you commit to the monthly fee, ask yourself a few questions. Do you play the games every day? Do you actually cook from the app, or do you just "save" recipes you’ll never make? Do you value the deep, investigative pieces that take months to produce?
If you answer yes to at least two of those, you’re probably in the "have to have NYT" camp.
Your Next Steps
If you are currently on the fence, start with the "Games" only subscription. It’s cheaper and gives you the Wordle/Spelling Bee/Crossword fix without the price of the full news package. You can always upgrade later.
Also, check your cell phone plan or credit card perks. Sometimes companies like Amex or Verizon offer "entertainment credits" that cover the cost of a Times sub entirely. It’s basically free money for your brain.
Go into your settings and turn off "Breaking News" alerts if you find them too stressful. You can keep the "Daily" notifications and the "Games" reminders without the constant "End of the World" pings. It makes the whole experience much more manageable.
Lastly, dive into the "Modern Love" column. Even if you aren't a "romance" person, the writing is consistently some of the best in the paper. It reminds you that behind all the big headlines and the data, the Times is still fundamentally about human stories.
Start by signing up for the free newsletters first. See if the writing style clicks with you. If you find yourself clicking the links more than three times a week, you’ve officially hit the "have to have" threshold. There's no shame in it—just make sure you actually use the Wirecutter reviews before you buy your next coffee maker. It’ll pay for the subscription in one go.