It’s been over twenty years. Two decades since the first orange-clad figures were photographed kneeling in the gravel at Camp X-Ray. Most people honestly thought the facility would be a footnote in a history book by now. But for the remaining Guantanamo Bay prison inmates, the clock is still ticking in a weird sort of legal limbo that most of us can’t even wrap our heads around.
The reality is messy.
You’ve got a mix of high-value detainees, guys who were cleared for release years ago but have nowhere to go, and the "forever prisoners" who haven't been charged with a crime but are considered too dangerous to let out. It's a legal black hole. It’s also a massive drain on the treasury, costing roughly $13 million per prisoner, per year. That's a staggering number. If you compare that to a high-security prison in the states, the math just looks broken.
Who are the Guantanamo Bay prison inmates left in the camps?
As of early 2026, the population has dwindled significantly from its peak of nearly 780 people. We’re looking at a small group now. Most were sent back to their home countries or resettled in places like Oman, Germany, or the UAE. But the ones who stayed? They fall into a few very specific, very complicated buckets.
First, you have the "High-Value Detainees." These are the names you recognize from the news. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) is the big one. He’s the guy the government says masterminded 9/11. Then there’s Ramzi bin al-Shibh and Walid bin Attash. These guys aren't just sitting in a cell; they’re caught in a military commission process that has been stalled for what feels like forever. Legal challenges regarding the use of "enhanced interrogation"—which the rest of the world calls torture—have tied the prosecution's hands. Evidence obtained that way is basically radioactive in a court of law.
The cleared but stranded
Then there's the group that makes human rights lawyers lose sleep. These are Guantanamo Bay prison inmates who have been "cleared for transfer." This doesn't mean they were found innocent in a traditional court. It means a Periodic Review Board (PRB)—a panel of experts from the intelligence and defense communities—decided they no longer pose a significant threat to U.S. security.
But here’s the kicker.
👉 See also: Ethics in the News: What Most People Get Wrong
Being cleared doesn't mean you get a plane ticket home tomorrow. If your home country is a war zone like Yemen, the U.S. won't send you back because they’re afraid you’ll just get recruited by a militant group. So, these men sit. They wait for a third-party country to say, "Yeah, we'll take him." Some have been waiting for over a decade after being told they can leave. It’s a psychological nightmare.
The Forever Prisoners
Finally, we have the "Lawful Belligerents." The government doesn't have enough evidence to convict them of a specific crime that would hold up in the military commissions, but they also don't want to let them go. It’s a "preventative detention" model. They are held under the Laws of War. Essentially, as long as the "hostilities" continue, the U.S. argues it can hold them. Since the war on terror doesn't have a clear "signed treaty on a battleship" ending, that could technically be forever.
The aging crisis at Camp 7 and beyond
The detainees are getting old.
This is something people don't really talk about. When Gitmo opened, these were men in their 20s and 30s. Now? They’re dealing with the same stuff your grandpa is. We’re talking about diabetes, heart disease, cognitive decline, and mobility issues. The facility wasn't built to be a nursing home.
Providing medical care in a remote naval base in Cuba is a logistical nightmare. You can't just drive a prisoner to a specialist in Miami. You have to fly the specialists to the island. Or you have to build a multi-million dollar surgical suite inside the wire. The Defense Department has had to grapple with the ethics and the costs of long-term geriatric care for people the U.S. doesn't even want on its soil.
James G. Connell III, a defense attorney for some of these men, has often pointed out that the physical toll of their early years in custody—specifically the time spent in CIA "black sites"—has accelerated their aging. The trauma is physical. It shows up in their MRIs and their blood work. It’s a complication that the original architects of the detention center never really planned for.
✨ Don't miss: When is the Next Hurricane Coming 2024: What Most People Get Wrong
The legal stalemate: Why isn't it closed?
Every president since Bush has talked about closing it or "right-sizing" it. Obama famously signed an executive order on his first day to shut it down within a year. Didn't happen. Trump wanted to load it up with "bad hombres." Didn't happen. Biden has been quietly transferring people out, but the final doors remain locked.
Why? Politics.
There’s a law that basically says no Gitmo prisoner can be brought to the U.S. mainland for any reason. Not for trial, not for imprisonment, not for medical care. This makes it almost impossible to move the military commissions to a more efficient setting. Members of Congress don't want these guys in their "backyard," even if "backyard" means a supermax prison in Colorado that has never had an escape.
Honestly, the legal system created for the Guantanamo Bay prison inmates was an experiment that most legal experts agree failed. The military commissions were supposed to be faster than federal courts. Instead, they’ve been slower. Much slower. In the time it’s taken to start the 9/11 trial, the U.S. federal court system has tried, convicted, and sentenced hundreds of terrorism suspects.
- Federal courts have a 90%+ conviction rate for terror cases.
- Military commissions have yielded only a handful of convictions, some of which were later overturned.
- The cost per inmate at Gitmo is roughly $13 million annually.
- The cost per inmate at a U.S. Supermax is about $78,000 annually.
What life looks like now for a Gitmo detainee
It’s not the hooding and sensory deprivation of the early 2000s anymore. Most of the remaining prisoners live in "communal" settings. They can watch TV, they have access to a library, and they can pray together. They’ve even had art classes—though the government got into a big legal fight a few years ago about whether the inmates actually owned the art they created.
The military tried to seize the paintings. They said the art was government property. Eventually, they backed down a bit, but it showed just how much control the state maintains over every single aspect of these men's lives.
🔗 Read more: What Really Happened With Trump Revoking Mayorkas Secret Service Protection
For the "compliant" prisoners, life is a dull, repetitive routine of eating, sleeping, and exercising in a small yard. For the high-value guys in Camp 7 (or whatever they've renamed it now), it's much more restricted. They are isolated. Their communications with the outside world are heavily monitored and often delayed by weeks or months.
Lessons learned and the path forward
Whether you think these men are the "worst of the worst" or victims of a massive legal overreach, the existence of the prison has changed the way the world looks at American justice. It’s been a recruitment tool for extremist groups. It’s been a point of friction with our closest allies.
If we want to understand the future of the Guantanamo Bay prison inmates, we have to look at the "Exit Strategies" being used right now:
- Diplomatic Resettlement: This is the most common. The State Department spends months, sometimes years, negotiating with countries to take a detainee. The receiving country usually has to promise to provide "security assurances," like monitoring the person or putting them through a rehabilitation program.
- Plea Deals: Recently, there’s been talk of "pre-trial agreements." Essentially, the government would drop the death penalty in exchange for a guilty plea and a guaranteed life sentence. This would finally provide some closure for the families of the 9/11 victims, who have been waiting for a trial for two decades.
- The "Slow Fade": Some believe the prison will only close when the last inmate dies of old age. It’s a grim prospect, but given the political gridlock in Washington, it’s a possibility that lawyers and activists discuss seriously.
The story of Guantanamo isn't just about the inmates. It's about the tension between national security and the rule of law. It's about what happens when a temporary solution becomes a permanent fixture.
To stay informed or take action on this issue, you should follow the work of the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) and the ACLU's National Security Project. They provide regular updates on the legal status of the remaining detainees and the ongoing litigation regarding the military commissions. You can also track the official PRB (Periodic Review Board) filings on the Department of Defense website to see which inmates are currently being considered for transfer. Understanding the specific case files of the remaining 30 or so men is the only way to move past the headlines and see the actual human and legal complexity of the situation.