Honestly, the summer of 2018 feels like a lifetime ago. Russia was the host, the Vuvuzelas of 2010 were a distant memory, and we were all just trying to figure out if "it" was actually coming home. When you look back at the groups of 2018 World Cup, it wasn't just about who won or lost. It was about the absolute chaos of the seeding. People forget how weird some of those draws looked at the time. You had heavyweights like Germany basically sleepwalking into a disaster, and then you had the underdog stories that shouldn't have worked, but somehow did.
The drama started way before the first whistle.
The way FIFA structured the groups of 2018 World Cup was based on the October 2017 World Rankings. This was a bit of a shift. It meant we didn't get that classic "geographic" separation in the same way we used to. Some groups looked like a cakewalk on paper. Others? Total nightmares.
The Group F Meltdown Nobody Saw Coming
If you want to talk about the groups of 2018 World Cup, you have to start with Group F. This was the group of death, but not in the way we expected. It had Germany, Mexico, Sweden, and South Korea. Everyone—and I mean everyone—assumed Germany would breeze through. They were the defending champions. They had Joachim Löw. They looked invincible.
Then Mexico happened.
That opening game in Moscow was electric. Hirving Lozano's goal didn't just win a game; it literally caused a minor seismic event in Mexico City because so many people jumped at the same time. Germany looked slow. They looked old. It was the first sign that the "champions curse" was alive and well. Germany eventually finished bottom of the group. Think about that for a second. The defending world champions lost to Mexico and South Korea and went home before the knockout rounds even started. Sweden somehow topped the group, proving that tactical discipline usually beats raw talent when the talent is unmotivated.
Group B: The Iberian Civil War
Group B gave us arguably the best game of the entire tournament. Portugal vs. Spain. It was basically Cristiano Ronaldo versus the world. That 3-3 draw was peak football.
But look at the rest of the group. You had Iran and Morocco. Most people ignored them. Big mistake. Morocco played some of the most attractive football in the tournament but just couldn't finish their chances. Iran was seconds away from knocking Portugal out in the final group game. If Mehdi Taremi’s late shot had been two inches to the left, Ronaldo would have been heading home in the first week. It shows how thin the margins are in the groups of 2018 World Cup. One deflection changes history.
Spain was a mess internally, too. They fired their manager, Julen Lopetegui, two days before their first game because he took the Real Madrid job. It’s the kind of drama you can’t make up. They still got through the group, but they never looked right.
The Statistical Quirk of Group H
Group H was the weirdest one. Poland, Senegal, Colombia, and Japan. No "massive" historical giants, just four very solid teams. It ended in the most controversial way possible.
Japan and Senegal finished with the exact same points, same goal difference, and same goals scored. They even drew with each other. For the first time in World Cup history, it went down to the "Fair Play" rule. Japan had fewer yellow cards than Senegal. So, Japan moved on, and Senegal was out. It felt cruel. It was cruel. But that's the reality of the groups of 2018 World Cup—sometimes your discipline matters as much as your strikers.
Group D and the Argentinian Crisis
Argentina's run in Group D was a literal soap opera. They had Lionel Messi, but they also had a coaching staff that seemed to be at war with the players.
✨ Don't miss: Why the basketball courts Venice Beach still dominate the culture
- They drew 1-1 with Iceland (who were making their debut).
- They got absolutely dismantled by Croatia 3-0.
- They needed a last-minute miracle volley from Marcos Rojo against Nigeria to survive.
Croatia was the real story here. They didn't just win the group; they dominated it. Luka Modric was playing a different sport than everyone else. This group proved that a cohesive team will always beat a collection of stars who aren't talking to each other. Nigeria played with so much heart, but they lacked that final bit of clinical finishing to put Argentina away.
Why the 2018 Groups Changed the Game
We saw a massive shift in how "small" teams approached the big guys. The gap was closing. Iceland’s "thunderclap" wasn't just a gimmick; it was a symbol of organized, defensive football frustrating the world's best player.
- VAR Impact: This was the first World Cup with Video Assistant Referees. It changed how defenders acted in the box during group play. We saw a record number of penalties.
- Set Piece Dominance: England, for example, basically built their entire Group G strategy around corners and free-kicks. It worked.
- Physical Conditioning: The teams that thrived, like France and Croatia, were the ones that could maintain high-intensity pressing for 90 minutes.
France in Group C was actually kind of boring. They beat Australia 2-1 with a lucky deflection and a penalty. They beat Peru 1-0. They played out a 0-0 snoozefest with Denmark. Nobody watched those group games and thought, "Yeah, these guys are going to score four in the final." But Didier Deschamps knew that in the groups of 2018 World Cup, you just need to survive and advance. Efficiency over style.
The Underestimated Success of Group E
Brazil was in Group E with Switzerland, Serbia, and Costa Rica. Brazil did what Brazil does—they won the group—but it wasn't easy. The Swiss held them to a draw. This group was a masterclass in mid-tier European grit. Serbia had some incredible individual talent (Milinkovic-Savic, Mitrovic), but they couldn't quite find the balance. It was a reminder that even the "juggernauts" like Brazil have to sweat through the opening two weeks.
🔗 Read more: Why the Portland Trail Blazers 2010 Roster Was One of the Biggest What-Ifs in NBA History
Actionable Insights for Football Historians and Fans
If you're looking back at the groups of 2018 World Cup to understand modern football trends, keep these specific takeaways in mind.
First, look at the distance traveled. Russia is huge. Some teams had to fly thousands of miles between group games, while others stayed in relatively tight clusters. This fatigue played a massive role in the third group games.
Second, study the late goals. The 2018 tournament had an insane amount of goals scored after the 90th minute. This tells us that the fitness levels in modern football make the "final push" more dangerous than ever. If you're analyzing these games, don't stop at the 80-minute mark.
Third, recognize the death of the "easy" group. While Group A (Russia, Uruguay, Egypt, Saudi Arabia) looked weak, it provided the highest-scoring opening match in years and saw the host nation build the momentum that eventually knocked out Spain.
The most important thing to do next is to compare the 2018 group stats with the 2022 tournament in Qatar. You'll see a clear evolution in how teams use the five-substitute rule (which wasn't a thing in 2018) and how the transition from a "stay-at-home" defense to a high-pressing line began its peak during those Russian summer weeks. Re-watching the highlights of Group F specifically provides the best blueprint for how an underdog can dismantle a high-possession giant.