It stood for twenty-four years on a windswept ridge in Gicumbi. If you drove north from Kigali toward the Ugandan border, you couldn't miss it—a sprawling grid of mud-brick houses and corrugated iron roofs clinging to the steep hillsides of Rwanda’s Northern Province. For over 10,000 Congolese refugees, Gihembe Refugee Camp wasn't just a "site." It was the only home they knew.
Then, in 2021, it vanished.
Well, the people did. The buildings remained for a while, but the life of the camp was systematically uprooted and moved hundreds of kilometers away to the flat, hot plains of Kirehe. People often think refugee camps are permanent fixtures of the landscape, but Gihembe proves they aren't. Honestly, the story of its closure is a mix of environmental disaster, government policy, and the grueling reality of life in the "land of a thousand hills."
The Mudende Survivors: A Dark History
You can’t talk about Gihembe without talking about Mudende. In December 1997, a horrific massacre occurred at the Mudende camp in western Rwanda. Armed groups crossed over from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and slaughtered hundreds of refugees in cold blood.
The survivors were terrified. They needed somewhere safe, somewhere far from the border. The Rwandan government and the UNHCR (the UN Refugee Agency) picked a high, rocky ridge in Gicumbi District. That was the birth of Gihembe. For decades, about 99% of the people living there were those same Mudende survivors or their children.
It was a place of deep trauma but also incredible resilience. People built lives there. They opened small shops. Kids went to school at the nearby Groupe Scolaire Inyange. But the very geography that kept them safe from militias eventually became their biggest enemy.
💡 You might also like: Robert Hanssen: What Most People Get Wrong About the FBI's Most Damaging Spy
Why Gihembe Refugee Camp Actually Closed
The official reason for the closure in late 2021 was "environmental hazards." That sounds like dry, bureaucratic language until you actually saw the ravines.
Gicumbi is steep. Like, really steep. Over two decades of human habitation on those slopes—thousands of people walking the same paths, cutting wood, and building shelters—led to catastrophic soil erosion. Massive gullies, or ravines, began to swallow the camp from the edges.
- Landslide Risk: The camp was sitting on a literal geological time bomb. Heavy rains, which are becoming more intense in Rwanda due to climate change, were washing away the foundations of houses.
- Aging Infrastructure: The mud-brick homes were crumbling. Replacing them on those slopes was deemed nearly impossible by engineers from MINEMA (Ministry in Charge of Emergency Management).
- Safety: It wasn't just about the houses falling; it was about the children playing near 50-foot drops that didn't exist ten years prior.
By the time the final decision was made, the camp was home to roughly 9,922 individuals. They were given a choice: move to Mahama Refugee Camp in the Eastern Province or try to make it as "urban refugees" in cities like Kigali or Huye. Most chose Mahama.
The Great Migration to Mahama
Mahama is different. It’s flat. It’s hot. It’s huge. Located in Kirehe, it was originally built for Burundian refugees, but it has since become a multi-national hub.
Moving was hard. Imagine living in the cool, misty mountains of the north for 24 years and then being told you’re moving to the semi-arid east. Refugees like Sefuku Thomas, who had lived in Gihembe since its inception, told reporters at the time that while they were sad to leave, the danger of the ravines had become too much to ignore.
📖 Related: Why the Recent Snowfall Western New York State Emergency Was Different
The relocation happened in waves. Convoys of buses and trucks loaded with mattresses, cooking pots, and memories made the long trek across the country. By December 2021, Gihembe was officially no longer a refugee camp.
What's Left in Gicumbi Today?
If you visit the site now, it’s a ghost of its former self. The Rwandan government and UNHCR didn't just walk away; they launched a massive environmental rehabilitation project.
They’ve planted thousands of trees—agroforestry species and fruit trees—to try and stabilize the soil. The goal is to "heal" the land that was stripped bare by decades of intensive use. It’s a slow process. Nature doesn't fix a 20-meter deep ravine overnight.
The Resettlement Question
For many in Gihembe, the dream was never Mahama; it was the United States, Canada, or Australia.
Starting around 2012, the U.S. government partnered with the UNHCR to fast-track resettlement for the Mudende survivors. They used what’s called "Priority 2" (P2) processing. This was a big deal. Thousands of people from Gihembe actually did make it out. They are now living in places like Michigan, Texas, and Ohio.
👉 See also: Nate Silver Trump Approval Rating: Why the 2026 Numbers Look So Different
But for those who didn't get picked, the closure of the camp felt like another door closing. Life in Mahama is safer, sure, but it's a long way from the mountain home they built.
Actionable Insights for Researchers and Donors
If you’re looking into the status of refugees in Rwanda or want to help, keep these points in mind:
- Follow the Data: The UNHCR Rwanda Data Portal is the most accurate source for current population counts in Mahama and other remaining camps like Kiziba and Nyabiheke.
- Climate Matters: Gihembe is a case study in why "climate-resilient" infrastructure is needed for refugee housing. Camps shouldn't be built on steep slopes without massive investment in drainage.
- Urban Integration: Not everyone moved to Mahama. A small percentage of Gihembe’s former residents are now trying to survive in Rwanda’s cities. Support for urban refugee livelihoods—like small business grants—is where the real need is now.
- Land Restoration: The Gicumbi site remains a focus for environmentalists. Supporting local reforestation efforts in the Northern Province helps the host community regain the land that was lost to erosion.
The story of Gihembe isn't just about a camp closing. It's about how the environment, history, and international policy collide on a single Rwandan hillside. It serves as a reminder that for a refugee, "home" is often a fragile, temporary thing, even when it lasts for a quarter of a century.
To understand the current situation, your next step should be to look at the Joint Voluntary Repatriation programs between Rwanda and the DRC, as these determine if the people now in Mahama will ever actually go back to the Congo or if they will eventually become permanent residents of Rwanda.