Making money in the stock market isn't about finding some objective "truth" or calculating the perfect intrinsic value of a company. Honestly, that’s where most retail investors trip up. They think the market is a scale that weighs facts. George Soros, the man who famously "broke" the Bank of England, argued the exact opposite in his 1987 classic. He called it The Alchemy of Finance. It’s a weird, dense, and often frustrating book that basically claims markets are chaotic because our own biases actually change the reality of the economy.
Markets don't just react to events. They create them.
Think about that for a second. If everyone thinks a bank is going to fail, they pull their money out. The bank then actually fails. The "prediction" caused the "fact." This isn't just psychology; it's a feedback loop that Soros labeled "reflexivity." It flies right in the face of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) that they still teach in most MBA programs. According to EMH, prices always reflect all available information. Soros says that's nonsense because prices distort the information.
Why The Alchemy of Finance is still messing with investor brains
Most people pick up this book expecting a "how-to" guide on getting rich. They get hit with a wall of philosophy instead. Soros spent a huge chunk of his youth studying under Karl Popper, and you can tell. He’s obsessed with the idea that humans are inherently fallible. We can’t see the world clearly because we are part of the world we’re trying to observe.
In The Alchemy of Finance, Soros lays out his thesis: markets are in a constant state of divergence from reality. Sometimes that divergence is tiny. Other times, it’s a massive, gaping chasm. When the gap gets too big, you get a boom-bust cycle.
Take the 2008 housing crisis as a prime example of reflexivity in the wild.
Initially, lending standards were relaxed because house prices were rising. Because lending was easy, more people bought houses. This pushed prices even higher. The rising prices "validated" the bad lending standards, making banks feel even safer. It was a self-reinforcing loop where the biased expectations of the participants changed the underlying credit fundamentals of the entire US economy. It wasn't a "mistake" by the market; the market's own momentum created the conditions for the disaster.
The Theory of Reflexivity Explained (Simply)
Let's break this down into two functions.
First, there’s the cognitive function. This is how we try to understand the world.
Second, there’s the participative function. This is how we influence the world with our actions.
📖 Related: Private Credit News Today: Why the Golden Age is Getting a Reality Check
Usually, we think these work in one direction: we see a situation, we process it, and we act. Soros argues they happen simultaneously. Our understanding influences our actions, and our actions change the situation, which then changes our understanding again. It’s a circle. Not a line.
This makes the "equilibrium" that economists love so much a total myth. Markets aren't moving toward a stable point of rest. They are usually swinging like a pendulum between two extremes. If you’re looking for "fair value," you might wait forever while the market stays irrational long enough to bankrupt you.
Breaking the Bank of England: Reflexivity in Action
You can’t talk about The Alchemy of Finance without talking about September 16, 1992—Black Wednesday. This is the moment Soros transitioned from a successful hedge fund manager to a global legend.
The UK was part of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM). They were trying to keep the Pound artificially high against the German Deutsche Mark. Soros saw the flaw. He realized the British government couldn't keep interest rates high enough to defend the currency without destroying their own domestic economy.
He didn't just bet against the Pound; he bet huge.
By shorting the currency so aggressively, his Quantum Fund (and others who followed) actually increased the pressure on the Bank of England. The market's lack of confidence—the "bias"—forced the government’s hand. They eventually folded, the Pound crashed, and Soros walked away with a billion dollars in profit in a single day.
He wasn't just a passive observer. He was a participant who understood that the government's "commitment" to the ERM was a fragile narrative. Once the narrative broke, the reality followed instantly.
👉 See also: Syrian Dinar to Dollar: Why Everyone Gets the Name (and the Rate) Wrong
Why most traders fail to use these concepts
It’s hard. It’s really, really hard.
Most people use technical analysis (charts) or fundamental analysis (spreadsheets). The Alchemy of Finance requires you to do "narrative analysis." You have to figure out what the prevailing bias is and then ask: "Is this bias currently reinforcing the trend, or is it about to exhaust itself?"
There's a specific sequence Soros looks for:
- A period where the trend isn't yet recognized.
- A period of self-reinforcing acceleration (the "sweet spot").
- The moment of conviction where everyone is "all in."
- The "twilight period" where prices keep rising but the fundamentals have started to rot.
- The crash.
Most investors jump in during stage 3 or 4. Soros made his bones by identifying stage 1 and riding it through stage 2, then exiting while everyone else was still screaming "to the moon."
The problem with "Scientific" Economics
Soros is pretty scathing about social sciences trying to mimic physics. In physics, a rock doesn't care what you think about it. It falls at the same speed regardless. In finance, if everyone thinks a stock is "The Next Big Thing," the stock price goes up, the company can issue more shares, use that cash to buy competitors, and actually become a bigger thing.
The observer changes the object.
This means there are no universal "laws" in finance that work 100% of the time. What worked in the 1980s might fail today because people have learned the pattern and their new behavior has changed the market's "DNA."
✨ Don't miss: New Zealand currency to AUD: Why the exchange rate is shifting in 2026
Critiques and Limitations
It would be wrong to say Soros is always right. He’s the first to admit he’s wrong all the time. In fact, his secret weapon isn't some magical ability to see the future; it's his willingness to cut his losses the second his thesis is proven wrong. He famously said his back starts to ache when his portfolio is out of whack. It’s a physical reaction to being "out of sync" with reflexivity.
Critics argue that The Alchemy of Finance is too vague. How do you actually measure "bias"? How do you quantify a "narrative"? You can't. That’s why it’s called alchemy and not chemistry. It’s an art form.
Some quantitative traders think reflexivity is just a fancy word for "momentum" or "positive feedback loops." They aren't entirely wrong. But Soros’s approach is more holistic. He’s looking at the intersection of politics, sociology, and economics.
Actionable Insights for the Modern Investor
You don't need a billion dollars to apply these ideas. You just need to stop thinking like a robot.
First, look for divergent narratives. When the news says one thing but the price action says another, pay attention. If a company reports terrible earnings but the stock price goes up, the market is telling you that the "bearish" bias is exhausted. The reality (bad earnings) is being ignored by the participants who are already looking toward the next cycle.
Second, understand the False Trend. In every bubble, there is a kernel of truth. The Dot-com bubble was based on the very real truth that the internet would change everything. The "falsehood" was that every company with a ".com" would be worth billions. Don't dismiss a trend just because it seems crazy; find the truth at the center and then figure out how far the bias has stretched that truth.
Third, be your own harshest critic. Soros succeeds because he is ruthlessly self-aware. He looks for reasons why his trade is wrong, not why it's right. If you’re holding a stock, you should be able to argue the bear case better than the bears themselves.
Practical Steps to Implement Reflexive Thinking:
- Audit the Narrative: Before buying an asset, write down the "story" the market is currently telling itself. Is it a story of "infinite growth" or "impending doom"?
- Identify the Feedback Loop: What is making the price move? Is it actual revenue growth, or is it just more people buying because the price went up yesterday?
- Look for Political Triggers: Reflexivity is strongest where the government and the economy meet. Watch for central bank shifts or regulatory changes that can break a self-reinforcing loop.
- Test for Fragility: Ask yourself: "What one fact, if changed, would make this whole narrative fall apart?" If that fact is something fragile—like "interest rates will stay at zero forever"—then you are in a high-risk reflexive bubble.
The market isn't a math problem to be solved. It’s a messy, human drama where the script is being rewritten as the actors perform. Understanding The Alchemy of Finance means accepting that you'll never have the full picture. But if you can see the bias that others are missing, you’re no longer just a participant—you’re an alchemist.