You probably remember the 1997 live-action George of the Jungle for Brendan Fraser’s incredible physical comedy or that earworm of a theme song. But if you look closer at the credits or the behind-the-scenes trivia from Disney’s vault, two names stand out to animal lovers: George of the Jungle Max and Thor.
They weren't actors in the traditional sense. They were lions.
Most people assume that every animal in a 90s flick was either a guy in a suit or some early, clunky CGI. While Jim Henson’s Creature Shop did some heavy lifting for the gorillas, the lions were very much the real deal. Max and Thor were the feline stars tasked with bringing a sense of "danger" to George’s goofy paradise. Dealing with apex predators on a movie set is a logistical nightmare, honestly. You can't just tell a lion to "look more menacing" or "hit your mark." You're working on their schedule, not the director’s.
Who Were the Lions?
Max and Thor weren't just random rescues. They were professional animal actors. In the late 90s, Hollywood relied heavily on a handful of specialized trainers who understood how to coax specific behaviors out of big cats without using the cruel methods of the old circus days. These lions were socialized from a young age to handle the chaos of a film set—the lights, the shouting, and the weird smell of hairspray.
It's kinda wild when you think about it. Brendan Fraser had to spend a significant amount of time around these creatures. Even though movie magic uses clever editing and split screens to keep the humans safe, the presence of George of the Jungle Max and Thor on set changed the entire energy of the production. You don't mess around when there's 400 pounds of muscle and teeth ten feet away.
The Reality of Working with Max and Thor
The production of George of the Jungle was a massive undertaking. Disney wanted that classic, slapstick vibe, but they also wanted the jungle to feel "lived in." That meant real animals.
📖 Related: Chris Robinson and The Bold and the Beautiful: What Really Happened to Jack Hamilton
Working with Max and Thor required a specific protocol.
- Trainers were always within arm's reach.
- The set was closed to unnecessary personnel.
- Feeding schedules were timed perfectly so the lions were "lazy" but not "sleepy."
One of the big misconceptions about movie animals is that they are "tame." Experts like those at the American Humane Association, who monitored the film, will tell you that a lion is never truly tame. They are "trained." There is a massive difference. Thor might have been great at sitting on a specific rock, but he was still a predator.
If you watch the scenes involving the lions today, you’ll notice that George rarely actually touches them in a way that involves high-energy movement. Most of the interaction is suggested through clever camera angles.
Why We Don't See This Anymore
Honestly, George of the Jungle represents the tail end of an era. Shortly after Max and Thor did their thing, the industry shifted. CGI got better. The Lion King remake (the "live-action" one that was actually just high-end animation) showed that you could have a lion on screen without the liability of a real lion on set.
Using George of the Jungle Max and Thor today would be a PR nightmare for a major studio. The ethics of animal acting have evolved. People want to see animals in the wild, not on a soundstage in Burbank. But back in '97, it was the gold standard. It gave the film a texture that modern green-screen movies lack. You can see the way the light hits their fur. You can see the genuine weight in their movements. It's real.
👉 See also: Chase From Paw Patrol: Why This German Shepherd Is Actually a Big Deal
The Training Process
How do you get a lion to "act"? It’s all about positive reinforcement. Trainers use "targets"—usually a stick with a colorful ball on the end—to guide the animal. When the lion touches the target with its nose, it gets a treat. Usually a bit of raw meat or a specific type of milk.
Max was known for being the more "photogenic" of the two, often used for close-ups where the lion needed to look majestic. Thor was more active. He did the walking, the prowling, the "being a lion" stuff. This tag-team approach is common in Hollywood. You have the "beauty" animal and the "stunt" animal.
Behind the Scenes: The Safety Factor
People always ask: "Was Brendan Fraser ever in danger?"
Technically, yes.
While the trainers were masters of their craft, a lion's instinct can flip in a heartbeat. There are stories from the set of George of the Jungle where production had to halt because one of the lions just wasn't "feeling it." If Max or Thor decided they wanted to nap in the middle of a sequence, the $100,000-a-day production waited. You don't argue with a lion.
✨ Don't miss: Charlize Theron Sweet November: Why This Panned Rom-Com Became a Cult Favorite
The "No Animals Were Harmed" disclaimer you see at the end of the movie isn't just a legal shield. It’s a badge of honor for the trainers who kept Max and Thor healthy and the cast safe. They had to ensure the lions weren't stressed by the loud noises of the "swinging" stunts or the repetitive nature of filming a scene 20 times.
The Legacy of the Jungle Lions
When we talk about the legacy of George of the Jungle, we usually talk about the abs or the humor. But the contribution of George of the Jungle Max and Thor is what grounded the movie. Without them, the stakes wouldn't have felt real—even in a comedy.
They were part of a lineage of Hollywood animals that includes the likes of the MGM lion or the tigers from Gladiator. They represent a time when the physical presence of an animal was irreplaceable.
If you’re a fan of the film, it’s worth going back and watching the lion scenes with a fresh set of eyes. Look at the way they move. Notice that they aren't looking at the actors; they are usually looking off-camera at their trainers holding a treat. It’s a fascinating glimpse into a style of filmmaking that is rapidly disappearing.
Actionable Takeaways for Movie Buffs
If you're interested in the history of animal actors or the specific work of these lions, there are a few things you can do to dig deeper:
- Check the Credits: Look for the "Animal Trainers" section in the end credits. Research the companies listed; many of them have archives or interviews about their famous feline stars.
- Study the AHA Reports: The American Humane Association keeps records of their on-set monitoring. These reports often detail exactly how many animals were used and if any specific "incidents" (like a lion refusing to leave its trailer) occurred.
- Watch the "Making Of" Features: The DVD and Blu-ray releases of 90s Disney movies are goldmines for b-roll footage of the animals interacting with the crew.
- Compare to Modern CGI: Watch a scene with Max or Thor, then watch a scene from a modern jungle movie. Note the difference in how shadows fall on the fur and how the animal's weight affects the grass or ground beneath it.
The era of George of the Jungle Max and Thor might be over, but their performance remains a testament to the complex relationship between Hollywood and the natural world. They weren't just props. They were the heart of the jungle.
To truly appreciate the work of animal actors from this era, look for the specialized documentaries on the "Hollywood Animal Stars" of the 90s. Many of the trainers who worked with Max and Thor have since retired, but their insights into big cat behavior on set provide a masterclass in patience and respect for wildlife. Pay close attention to the lighting techniques used in the late 90s to blend real animal footage with animatronic puppets, as this was the peak of practical effects before the digital takeover.