Everyone thought they knew exactly what was going to happen. The narrative was basically set in stone: Gen Z voters 2024 would be the ultimate progressive firewall, a massive blue wave of TikTok-savvy activists saving the day for the Democrats.
Except, that’s not really what happened. Honestly, the reality is way messier and a lot more interesting.
While the 18-29 crowd did favor Kamala Harris over Donald Trump, the margin was a fraction of what Joe Biden saw in 2020. We’re talking about a 4-point lead for Harris (51% to 47%) compared to the staggering 25-point lead Biden held four years prior. That’s not just a "slight shift." It’s an earthquake in terms of demographic math.
The Myth of the Monolith
If you've been following the news, you probably heard that Gen Z is the most progressive generation ever. Sure, in some ways they are, but the 2024 results proved that treating them like a single, unified block is a huge mistake.
The biggest story? The gender gap. It’s huge. Young women went for Harris by about 17 points. Meanwhile, young men swung hard the other way, backing Trump by 14 points. That is a 31-point canyon between people who grew up in the same houses and went to the same schools.
Why? Some analysts, like Evan Doerr from Harvard’s Institute of Politics, argue that young men felt pushed out of modern cultural movements. They felt like "second-class allies" in the stories the left was telling. Trump, on the other hand, went on the podcasts they actually listen to. He hung out with the influencers they follow. He spoke their language, even if that language was mostly memes and "independent streak" talk.
Turnout wasn't what we expected
People love to say Gen Z doesn't vote. That's kinda true, but also kinda not.
About 47% of eligible youth showed up in 2024. That’s a bit lower than the 50% we saw in 2020, but it’s still way higher than the 39% from 2016.
- Minnesota led the pack with a 62% youth turnout.
- Maine (60%) and Michigan (58%) weren't far behind.
- On the flip side, Oklahoma and Arkansas saw only about 33% of their young people at the polls.
Money, Not Just Memes
You’d think Gen Z was only voting on climate change or social justice. Nope.
Economics—specifically inflation and the cost of living—was the top issue by a mile. It turns out that when you can’t afford rent and grocery prices are sky-high, you start looking for someone to blame.
👉 See also: Why an accident in Palm Springs CA happens so often and what to do next
For many young voters, the "vibe" of the economy was just bad. They grew up watching their parents struggle through a pandemic and then entered a job market where a "good" salary barely covers a studio apartment.
A lot of these voters aren't necessarily "conservative" in the traditional sense. In fact, CIRCLE data shows that about half of young Trump voters actually think the government should be doing more to solve problems, not less. They weren't voting for small-government Reaganomics; they were voting for a disruptor because the current system felt broken to them.
What about the "TikTok Ban" and Crypto?
It sounds silly to older generations, but the potential TikTok ban was a real point of contention. Trump came out against the ban, which resonated with a generation that basically lives on the app. Then you have crypto. A surprising number of Gen Z guys hold crypto assets, and Trump’s embrace of the digital currency world gave them a reason to pay attention.
The Disillusionment Factor
Here is something kind of terrifying: less than one-third of Americans under 30 actually trust the government. Only 16% think democracy is working well for them.
When you have that much cynicism, people do one of two things. They either stay home (which about 53% did) or they vote for the person who promises to tear the whole thing down. This wasn't just about liking a candidate. For many, it was a "protest vote" against a system they feel has abandoned them.
The Reality of Race and Education
We also saw some pretty stark divides based on whether or not someone went to college. Young people with a high school diploma or less favored Trump by 12 points. Those with college degrees favored Harris by 13 points.
And while Black and Asian youth still overwhelmingly supported the Democratic ticket, the margins among Latino men tightened significantly. The Democratic Party's "automatic" hold on these demographics is clearly slipping.
Actionable Insights for the Future
If you’re trying to understand or reach this group, stop looking at them as a unified "Gen Z." Here is what actually matters moving forward:
- Go where they are: Traditional TV ads are dead for this group. If you aren't on 3-hour-long podcasts or YouTube, you don't exist.
- Focus on the wallet: Social issues matter, but they don't trump (no pun intended) the ability to buy a house or pay for groceries.
- Acknowledge the cynicism: You can't "hope and change" your way into their hearts anymore. They want to see receipts. They want to know exactly how a policy affects their specific life.
- Watch the gender split: The cultural divide between young men and women is real and it’s growing. Any message that appeals to one often risks alienating the other right now.
The Gen Z voters 2024 didn't just follow a script. They rewrote it. They proved they are willing to jump ship if they feel ignored, and they aren't afraid to embrace "ironic" or "rebellious" politics if the establishment feels too stagnant.
Moving into 2026 and 2028, the "youth vote" is no longer a guaranteed win for any side. It’s a battleground.