Freddie Mercury and Rami Malek: What the Movie Actually Got Wrong

Freddie Mercury and Rami Malek: What the Movie Actually Got Wrong

You’ve seen the movie. You’ve heard the stomp-stomp-clap. Maybe you even cried when Rami Malek, draped in that iconic white tank top, strutted across the Live Aid stage. It felt real. It looked real. But if we’re being honest, the gap between the man and the performance is wider than most people think.

People love to talk about how Rami Malek "became" Freddie Mercury. It’s a great narrative. It’s the kind of stuff that wins Oscars, which, yeah, it did. But looking back from 2026, the conversation has shifted. We aren't just talking about the dentures and the spandex anymore; we're talking about the heavy lifting required to mimic a ghost that everyone feels like they own.

The Teeth, the Walk, and the "Movement Heritage"

Let's start with the physical stuff. Most actors hire a choreographer. Malek didn't. He realized pretty quickly that a choreographer would just teach him how to dance, and Freddie Mercury didn't dance—he moved. There's a difference. He hired Polly Bennett, a movement coach, and they spent months deconstructing why Freddie moved the way he did.

They looked at his "movement heritage." This meant digging into his past as a long-distance runner and a boxer in boarding school. Those aggressive, forward-leaning lunges on stage? That’s the boxer in him. The way he sprinted across the stage without losing breath? That’s the track athlete.

Then there were the teeth.

👉 See also: Album Hopes and Fears: Why We Obsess Over Music That Doesn't Exist Yet

Freddie had four extra incisors. He was incredibly self-conscious about them, often covering his mouth with his hand or his upper lip during interviews. Malek wore a set of prosthetic teeth for a year before filming even started. He wore them every single night. He wanted his tongue and lips to fight against them naturally, just like Freddie’s did. By the time the cameras rolled, the "Mercury Overbite" wasn't a prop; it was part of his face. He even had the teeth cast in gold after the shoot. Sorta weird? Maybe. But very Freddie.

Where the Movie Stretched the Truth

Hollywood loves a timeline. Reality? Not so much. Bohemian Rhapsody takes some massive liberties with the actual history of Queen.

  • The Big Breakup: In the movie, Freddie is the "diva" who breaks up the band to go solo. In real life, they never actually broke up. Both Brian May and Roger Taylor had released solo albums before Freddie did. They were just tired.
  • The HIV Diagnosis: This is the big one. The film shows Freddie telling the band he has AIDS right before the 1985 Live Aid performance. It makes for a dramatic "climax," but it’s factually off. Most biographers, including Peter Freestone (Freddie’s personal assistant), agree he wasn't even diagnosed until 1987.
  • Meeting Jim Hutton: The movie has them meeting at a party where Jim is a waiter. Actually, they met at a club called Heaven. Jim was a hairdresser. He didn't even know who Freddie was the first time they spoke.

It’s easy to get annoyed by these changes. But biopics aren't documentaries. They’re meant to capture the vibe of a person. If you want the dry facts, read a textbook. If you want to feel the electricity of a man who could hold 72,000 people in the palm of his hand, you watch the movie.

Was Rami Malek Too Stiff?

There's a vocal corner of the internet—mostly die-hard Queen fans—who think Malek was too robotic. They point to the Live Aid sequence. Freddie was "bendy." He was fluid. Malek, at times, looks like he's hitting marks.

✨ Don't miss: The Name of This Band Is Talking Heads: Why This Live Album Still Beats the Studio Records

Honestly, it’s an impossible task. You’re trying to replicate one of the most spontaneous performers in history. Freddie said it himself: "If it's planned, it's boring." Malek had to plan every single gesture to match the archive footage. That's a paradox. You can't be "spontaneously Freddie" while following a beat-by-beat map of a 1985 concert.

But watch Malek's eyes. In the quiet scenes, the ones away from the stadium lights, he captures the loneliness of Farrokh Bulsara. He captures the immigrant kid who felt like a "fish out of water" in London. That’s where the performance lives. It’s not in the fist-pumping; it’s in the way he looks at Mary Austin or the way he handles a cigarette when he's nervous.

The "Freddie Voice" Secret

Here’s something most people get wrong: they think it’s all Rami singing. It’s not. It’s a "sound soup."

The audio is a blend of three things:

🔗 Read more: Wrong Address: Why This Nigerian Drama Is Still Sparking Conversations

  1. Freddie Mercury’s original master tapes.
  2. Marc Martel, a singer who sounds almost exactly like Freddie.
  3. Rami Malek's actual voice.

Sound engineers spent months stitching these together so the breathing and the physical effort matched Malek's movements. Malek had to sing at the top of his lungs on set—even if his voice wasn't the one we eventually heard—because you can see the tension in a singer's neck and chest. You can't fake that.

Why It Still Matters

Freddie Mercury died in 1991, but he’s bigger now than he was then. Why? Because he was "no labels" before that was a thing. He was a Parsi immigrant from Zanzibar who became the ultimate British icon. He was queer in a time when that was a career-killer.

Rami Malek didn't just play a rock star; he played a man who refused to be a victim. That’s the "actionable insight" here. If you’re looking to understand the Mercury/Malek connection, don’t look at the costume. Look at the ambition. Both men were outsiders who pushed through incredible insecurity to reach the top of their fields.

If you want to go deeper into the real story, your next step is to watch the 2012 documentary Freddie Mercury: The Great Pretender. It strips away the Hollywood gloss and shows the man behind the mustache—the one who was shy, obsessed with his cats, and fiercely protective of his private life. It's the perfect chaser to the movie's high-octane drama.