Walk into a room with a Francis Bacon and you'll feel it before you see it. There’s this heavy, vibrating energy. Honestly, it’s like walking into the middle of a private conversation you weren't supposed to hear—or a bedroom you weren't supposed to enter. When we talk about Francis Bacon Two Figures, specifically the 1953 masterpiece, we’re talking about one of the most visceral, "shut the door and walk away" moments in 20th-century art.
It’s not just paint on a canvas. It’s a collision.
If you’ve seen it, you know the vibe. Two men are tangled together on a bed. Or are they? They’re blurred into a single, fleshy mass of movement and teeth and limbs. At first glance, it looks like a fight. At second glance, it’s clearly something much more intimate. And in 1953, when homosexuality was literally a criminal offense in the UK, this wasn't just "art"—it was a legal liability.
What’s Actually Happening in the Painting?
Bacon was a master of the "cover story." He always claimed his inspiration came from Eadweard Muybridge’s 1880s photographs of wrestlers. It was a clever move. By pointing to a Victorian scientific study of motion, he could tell the police or a grumpy gallery owner, "Oh, I’m just exploring the mechanics of the human body in action."
But let’s be real.
The bed is a mess. The lines are frantic. This isn't a wrestling match; it's a depiction of Bacon’s tempestuous, often violent relationship with Peter Lacy. Lacy was a former RAF pilot, a "man’s man" who also happened to be a violent alcoholic. He once threw Bacon through a glass window. He’d rip up Bacon’s canvases in drunken rages. Yet, Bacon called him the love of his life. You can see that duality in Francis Bacon Two Figures. It’s where pleasure and pain stop being different things and just become one big, dark smear of blue and white paint.
The Lucian Freud Drama
Here’s a bit of art world gossip that most people miss: for decades, you couldn't actually see this painting. Why? Because Lucian Freud owned it.
Freud, another titan of British art, bought the work for a measly £80 back in the day (Bacon apparently only pocketed £60 of that after commissions). But as their friendship soured into a bitter, lifelong rivalry, Freud became the painting’s jailer. He kept it stashed away in his private home and refused to let it be exhibited.
💡 You might also like: Henrik Ibsen’s An Enemy of the People: Why This 1882 Play Still Predicts Our Modern Mess
Bacon was furious.
He desperately wanted it for his major 1985 Tate retrospective, but Freud wouldn't budge. It was like a final "screw you" between two men who had once been inseparable. It wasn't until after Freud died in 2011 that the painting really started to circulate again, reminding everyone why it had caused such a scandal in the first place.
The "Curtain" and the Cage
One thing you’ll notice if you look closely at the Francis Bacon Two Figures 1953 version is the texture. Bacon used these vertical, "shutter" lines—he called them his curtains.
They do a few things:
- They make you feel like a voyeur, peeping through a screen.
- They add a sense of rapid, vibrating movement.
- They "cage" the figures, a recurring theme for Bacon.
He loved the idea of trapping his subjects. Whether it was the "screaming popes" in their glass boxes or these two lovers on a bed, the architecture of the painting always feels claustrophobic. It’s like there’s no air in the room. Just the smell of oil paint and sweat.
The Other "Two Figures"
To make things confusing, there isn't just one painting with this name. Bacon revisited the theme often.
- Two Figures in the Grass (1954): This one is even more "out there"—literally. It’s an al fresco version of the same theme. Two men in a field. When it was first shown at the ICA, people actually called the police. The cops showed up, took one look, and decided they were "just wrestling." Case closed.
- Two Figures (1975): This is a much later work, painted in Paris. It’s taller, nearly two meters high. While the 1953 version was about the heat of Peter Lacy, the 1975 version is a haunting, dark farewell to George Dyer, his other great (and tragic) love who had died a few years prior.
Why It Matters Now
In 2026, we’re used to seeing everything. We have the internet; nothing shocks us. But Francis Bacon Two Figures still has the power to make you feel uneasy. It’s because Bacon wasn't interested in beauty. He was interested in the "brutality of fact."
He didn't want to paint a picture of two men; he wanted to paint the feeling of being those two men. The adrenaline, the fear, the obsession.
If you want to understand Bacon, you have to look at how he handled the human body. He treated skin like wet meat. He saw the human animal beneath the suit and tie. In an era where we're constantly filtering our lives to look perfect, Bacon’s work is a reminder that we are all, at our core, a bit messy and a bit broken.
How to Experience Bacon’s Work Today
If you’re looking to dive deeper into the world of Francis Bacon Two Figures, you shouldn't just look at a digital screen. The scale and the texture are half the point.
- Visit the National Portrait Gallery: As of late 2025 and into 2026, they’ve been putting more of Bacon’s personal works on permanent display. Even if Two Figures is in a private collection, seeing his self-portraits from the same era gives you the "visual vocabulary" to understand his mindset.
- Study the Muybridge Connection: Look up the "Human Figure in Motion" series. It’s wild to see how Bacon took those stiff, black-and-white photos and turned them into something so fluid and terrifying.
- Read the Peppiatt Biography: Michael Peppiatt was a close friend of Bacon’s. His accounts of the Soho club scene where Bacon met Lacy give the painting a whole new level of "oh, so that's why it looks like that" context.
Don't go looking for a "message" or a moral. Bacon hated those. Just stand in front of the canvas and let the vibration of the paint hit you. It’s supposed to be uncomfortable. That’s how you know it’s working.