Fashion isn't just about clothes anymore. It's about power. If you’ve spent any time scrolling through the New York Times or flipping through a thick September issue, you’ve probably noticed something. The focus of Vogue and Elle NYT coverage isn't just about who is wearing what on a red carpet in Milan or Paris. It’s deeper. It’s about cultural shift.
Let’s be real. People have been predicting the death of print for decades. "Digital is king," they said. Yet, here we are in 2026, and the prestige of these legacy titles hasn't just survived—it’s actually become more concentrated.
Vogue and Elle aren't just magazines. They are gatekeepers. When the New York Times writes about them, they aren't just reviewing a publication; they are analyzing a social barometer. The Times treats Anna Wintour like a head of state and Nina Garcia like a high-level diplomat. Honestly, that's because they basically are.
The Editorial Split: High Art vs. The Everywoman
Vogue under Wintour has always leaned into the aspirational. It’s a dream. It’s the "Vogue Idea." This means high-concept photography, sprawling estates, and clothes that cost more than a mid-sized sedan. The NYT often highlights this specific focus as Vogue’s greatest strength and its most glaring vulnerability.
Elle takes a different swing. It feels a bit more grounded, even when it’s featuring a superstar on the cover. Under Nina Garcia, Elle has pivoted toward a mix of high fashion and practical "get the look" energy that feels accessible to someone who actually has a 9-to-5.
The New York Times loves to track this tension. They’ve covered how Vogue struggled to adapt to the diversity demands of the late 2010s, contrasting it with Elle’s slightly more nimble approach to social issues. It's a game of chess. One is the established monarchy; the other is the sophisticated challenger.
The Anna Wintour Effect
You can't talk about the focus of Vogue and Elle NYT reports without mentioning the "Nuclear Wintour" herself. The Times has chronicled her ascent and her endurance with a mix of awe and scrutiny. They look at her influence over the Met Gala—which is now basically the Super Bowl of socialites—and how that singular event keeps Vogue relevant in an era where TikTok influencers are everywhere.
Is she still the most powerful woman in fashion? The NYT seems to think so, even if her throne is looking a bit more digital these days. They recently noted how Vogue is leaning harder into "Vogue World," a traveling fashion show-meets-circus that proves the brand is no longer just a stack of paper. It’s a physical experience.
👉 See also: How is gum made? The sticky truth about what you are actually chewing
Digital Survival and the NYT Lens
The New York Times Business section is where the real tea gets spilled about these brands. They’ve tracked the brutal consolidation at Condé Nast (which owns Vogue) and Hearst (which owns Elle).
Here is what most people get wrong: they think these magazines are failing because newsstands are empty.
Actually, the NYT reports show that while print circulation is down, the "brand equity" is massive. A mention in Vogue is still the "Holy Grail" for a young designer. An Elle cover can still break an actress into the mainstream. The NYT focuses on the business of prestige. They look at how these outlets have turned into video production houses. Vogue’s "73 Questions" or "Beauty Secrets" series on YouTube gets millions of views—often more than the magazine had readers in its 1990s heyday.
The Shift Toward Activism
One of the biggest changes in the focus of Vogue and Elle NYT critics have pointed out is the shift toward politics. It’s weird, right? You used to open a fashion mag to escape the world. Now, you open it to see a profile on Kamala Harris or a deep dive into reproductive rights.
- Vogue has leaned into the "Global Citizen" vibe.
- Elle has doubled down on "Women in Hollywood" and "Women in Music" as platforms for advocacy.
- The NYT often questions if this is genuine or just "brand-safe activism."
Honestly, it’s a bit of both. The NYT doesn't pull punches when these magazines miss the mark. They’ve called out the lack of behind-the-scenes diversity even when the covers look inclusive. That's the nuance of the NYT's coverage—it celebrates the glamour but audits the ethics.
Why We Still Care
Why does the New York Times spend so much time analyzing these two specific magazines? Because they are the last of the Mohicans. Most other fashion titles have folded or become ghosts of their former selves.
Vogue and Elle represent the "Prestige Tier."
✨ Don't miss: Curtain Bangs on Fine Hair: Why Yours Probably Look Flat and How to Fix It
If you’re a brand like Chanel or Dior, you don't just want an ad on a random website. You want your bag next to a high-gloss editorial. The NYT understands that as long as luxury goods exist, these magazines have a reason to live. They are the natural habitat of the $10,000 coat.
The "Influencer" Problem
The New York Times has run several pieces on how influencers are eating Vogue’s lunch. Or are they?
Recently, the narrative has shifted. The NYT has started to report on "Influencer Fatigue." People are getting tired of the curated-but-fake Instagram life. They are looking back toward the "editors"—the people who actually have a trained eye and a sense of history. Vogue and Elle provide that. They offer a filter. In a world of infinite noise, a filter is worth its weight in gold.
The NYT’s Critical Eye on Diversity
We have to talk about the 2020 reckoning. The New York Times was relentless in its coverage of how Vogue and Elle responded to the Black Lives Matter movement. This was a turning point for the focus of Vogue and Elle NYT archives.
Before 2020, the coverage was mostly about the clothes. After 2020, it became about the masthead. The NYT reported on the departure of high-profile editors and the hiring of new, diverse talent like Chioma Nnadi (who now leads British Vogue). They tracked whether these changes were permanent or just PR stunts.
Elle arguably moved faster. They’ve been more consistent in featuring a broader range of body types and backgrounds, a fact the NYT has noted in its "Styles" section more than once. Vogue is slower, like a giant ocean liner trying to turn. It takes time, but when it moves, the whole industry follows.
The Future: AI and the 2026 Landscape
Now, in 2026, the NYT is looking at how these magazines handle Artificial Intelligence. Can an AI-generated model be on the cover of Vogue? Would Elle use AI to write a trend report?
🔗 Read more: Bates Nut Farm Woods Valley Road Valley Center CA: Why Everyone Still Goes After 100 Years
So far, the focus has been on "The Human Element." The NYT argues that the only thing keeping these magazines alive is the specific, human taste of their editors. If you take that away, it's just a catalog. And nobody pays $15 for a catalog.
Actionable Insights for the Modern Reader
If you’re trying to navigate the world of high fashion through the lens of these publications, here is how to actually digest the information without getting lost in the hype:
1. Read between the lines of the NYT Styles section.
The New York Times often acts as the "unofficial auditor" of fashion. If they are praising a move by Vogue, it’s usually because it marks a massive shift in the industry's economy, not just a "cool" photo shoot. Use the NYT to understand the why and Vogue/Elle to see the how.
2. Follow the "Lead Editor" moves.
In 2026, the individual editor matters more than the magazine title. If a director of photography leaves Elle for a tech startup, that tells you something about where the industry is heading. Track these people on LinkedIn or via NYT’s "Business of Fashion" recaps.
3. Look at the advertisers.
Want to know who is actually winning? Look at who is buying the front-of-book ads. If you see more tech companies (Apple, Samsung, Tesla) than perfume brands, the magazine is pivoting its target demographic toward the "New Wealth" sector.
4. Check the "Video Strategy."
Don't just look at the print issues. The NYT has pointed out that the real editorial "focus" of these brands is now their YouTube and TikTok presence. If you want the most up-to-date trend analysis, the video content is often three months ahead of the print magazine.
5. Distinguish between "Editorial" and "Advertorial."
The NYT has been vocal about the blurring lines here. Just because a celebrity is wearing a specific brand in a "candid" Elle interview doesn't mean it wasn't a paid placement. Be a skeptical consumer. Look for the "sponsored" or "in partnership with" tags that are often hidden in small print.
The world of Vogue and Elle is no longer just about the hemline of a skirt. It’s about who gets to tell the story of our culture. As the New York Times continues to monitor these giants, the focus remains clear: in a digital world, the only thing that matters is who has the most influence. Right now, the crown is still theirs, but the weight of it is heavier than ever.