You’ve heard it a thousand times. That walking bassline kicks in, the brass swells, and a velvety voice starts crooning about the stars. It feels like the ultimate NASA anthem. But honestly, the fly to the moon lyrics didn't start out as a space-age masterpiece. When Bart Howard sat down to write it in 1954, he wasn’t thinking about Apollo missions or lunar modules. He was actually just trying to write a simple waltz. He called it "In Other Words." It was slow. It was cabaret. It was almost... well, a bit sleepy compared to the version we blast at parties today.
Music history is funny like that. Sometimes a song has to sit on a shelf or pass through twenty different sets of hands before it actually finds its pulse. For this track, it took about a decade and a name change before the world even cared.
Why We Keep Singing Fly to the Moon Lyrics Decades Later
Why does it stick? It’s the simplicity. Howard once said it took him twenty years to learn how to write a song in twenty minutes, and that’s exactly what happened here. The lyrics are basically a giant loop of "I love you," but wrapped in enough celestial metaphors to make it feel sophisticated. You have this opening hook that everyone knows, but if you look at the sheet music from back in the day, the title was technically "In Other Words" for years. It wasn’t until people kept requesting the "fly to the moon song" that publishers finally gave in and changed the official title.
Frank Sinatra is the one who really cemented the fly to the moon lyrics in the global psyche. In 1964, he teamed up with Count Basie and Quincy Jones. Quincy is the secret sauce here. He’s the one who looked at the 3/4 waltz time and decided it needed to swing. He shifted it to 4/4 time. Suddenly, the song had a heartbeat. It went from a lounge act ballad to a finger-snapping anthem of the jet-set era.
The NASA Connection was Actually a Fluke
It’s hard to separate the song from the moon landing. We’ve seen the footage. We know the story. But it wasn't a marketing stunt. When the Apollo 10 and Apollo 11 crews headed up there, they brought cassette tapes. Buzz Aldrin famously played Sinatra’s version on a portable player while orbiting the moon. Think about that for a second. The first music ever played in the actual lunar vicinity featured lyrics about flying to the moon. Talk about a literal interpretation.
It wasn't just Aldrin, either. The song became the unofficial theme of the whole space program. Diana Krall even performed it at Neil Armstrong's memorial service in 2012. It has this weird, permanent link to the idea of human exploration, even though Bart Howard was probably just thinking about a girl in a jazz club in Manhattan when he penned the lines.
👉 See also: The Entire History of You: What Most People Get Wrong About the Grain
Breaking Down the Poetry of the Lyrics
If you actually sit down and read the fly to the moon lyrics without the music, they’re surprisingly repetitive. But that’s the genius of it. It’s structured as a series of translations.
- "Fly me to the moon / Let me play among the stars"
- "In other words, hold my hand"
See what he did there? Every grand, cosmic gesture is immediately followed by a grounded, human request. The "stars" are just a metaphor for the feeling of a first date. The "Jupiter and Mars" line? Just a fancy way of saying "I’m head over heels." It’s a very clever songwriting trick. You elevate the emotion to the level of the universe, then bring it back down to a simple touch.
The Evolution of the Verse
Most people don't realize there’s an introductory verse that almost everyone cuts out. Back in the fifties, it was common for songs to have a "verse" before the "chorus" that set the scene. Kaye Ballard, who made the first commercial recording in 1954, included it. It talks about poets using many words to say what’s on their mind. But let's be real—Sinatra was right to cut it. The song starts so much better when you just jump straight into the flight.
The structure is A-B-A-B, which makes it incredibly easy for the brain to categorize and remember. It's why kids can sing it and why it's a staple for every wedding band on the planet. You can't mess it up. Even if you forget the specific planets mentioned, the rhyme scheme is so intuitive that your brain fills in the gaps.
The Anime Effect: Neon Genesis Evangelion
If you grew up in the 90s or 2000s, your introduction to the fly to the moon lyrics might not have been Sinatra at all. It might have been a giant robot anime. Neon Genesis Evangelion used various versions of the song as its ending theme. This introduced the jazz standard to a massive demographic that probably wouldn't have been listening to 1960s swing.
✨ Don't miss: Shamea Morton and the Real Housewives of Atlanta: What Really Happened to Her Peach
There were dozens of versions created for the show—bossanova versions, somber piano versions, versions sung by the voice actresses. It created this strange juxtaposition. You’d have an episode ending in absolute psychological trauma and apocalyptic destruction, followed by a breezy, upbeat jazz song about playing among the stars. It shouldn't have worked. It worked perfectly.
Why Different Artists Change the Feel
The song is a chameleon. Because the fly to the moon lyrics are so open-ended, you can change the entire meaning just by changing the tempo.
- Tony Bennett did a version that felt more like a classic Broadway showstopper.
- Nat King Cole brought a smoothness that made it feel like a lullaby.
- Astrud Gilberto turned it into a Bossa Nova dream that feels like a summer afternoon in Brazil.
- Lady Gaga has performed it with a powerhouse vocal that reminds you how much range the melody actually requires.
It’s one of the most recorded songs in history. Some estimates suggest there are over 300 versions out there. Every time a new singer tries it, they’re basically trying to compete with the "Chairman of the Board," which is a losing battle for most. But the song survives because the bones are good.
The Technical Side of the Songwriting
Bart Howard was a student of the Great American Songbook. You can tell. He uses a "circle of fifths" progression for much of the song. For the non-musicians: that just means the chords follow a very natural, satisfying path that feels like it’s "coming home" every few bars.
It’s also surprisingly short. Most versions clock in under three minutes. In a world of six-minute prog-rock epics or overproduced pop tracks, there’s something refreshing about a song that says what it needs to say and then gets out of the way. It’s efficient. It’s elegant. It doesn't overstay its welcome.
🔗 Read more: Who is Really in the Enola Holmes 2 Cast? A Look at the Faces Behind the Mystery
Misconceptions About the Lyrics
A lot of people think the song was written for a movie. It wasn't. It was just a standalone piece of music. Others think it was written specifically for Sinatra. Nope. He didn't touch it until it had been around for ten years.
There’s also a common debate about the "Jupiter and Mars" line. Some people hear "Jupiter on Mars," which makes zero sense geographically or astronomically, but hey, people hear what they want to hear. The lyric is definitely "Jupiter and Mars." Howard wanted to cover the whole solar system to prove his point.
How to Use This Song Today
If you’re a musician looking to cover it, don't try to out-Sinatra Sinatra. You’ll lose. The best modern covers are the ones that strip it back. Think solo ukulele or a very dark, minor-key piano arrangement. Because the fly to the moon lyrics are so hopeful, flipping the tone to something melancholy actually reveals a whole new layer of the song. It turns a song about love into a song about longing.
For everyone else, it’s just the perfect karaoke backup. It’s in a comfortable range for most people. It’s recognizable. It makes you look classier than you probably are after three drinks.
Actionable Takeaways for Music Lovers
To truly appreciate the depth of this classic, try these specific listening steps:
- Listen to the original Kaye Ballard 1954 recording. It’s on most streaming platforms. Notice how different the waltz time feels compared to the swing version. It’s almost unrecognizable.
- Compare the mono vs. stereo mixes of Sinatra’s 1964 version. The Count Basie Orchestra sounds completely different depending on the depth of the mix. In the stereo version, you can really hear the "bite" of the brass section.
- Look up the lyrics to the "lost" introductory verse. Try reading it as a poem. It changes the context of the song from a direct plea to a meta-commentary on how hard it is for poets to express love.
- Check out the 1995 "Duets" version. Sinatra recorded it with Antonio Carlos Jobim. It’s a masterclass in how to blend two completely different styles—American Swing and Brazilian Bossa Nova—using the same lyrical foundation.
The song isn't going anywhere. As long as humans are looking at the sky and feeling like they’re floating, these words will stay relevant. It’s a piece of the 20th century that managed to hitch a ride into the future, and honestly, it sounds just as good now as it did in 1964.
Next Steps for Deep Listeners:
If you want to understand the musical architecture, find a lead sheet for "In Other Words" and look at the chord changes. You'll see how Bart Howard used descending sequences to create that feeling of "falling" in love. Then, find the Quincy Jones arrangement notes—if you can find a reprint—to see how he transposed those chords to fit the aggressive swing of the Count Basie band. This transition from a "pretty" song to a "cool" song is the greatest rebranding in music history.