First World War Letters: What Most People Get Wrong About the Trenches

First World War Letters: What Most People Get Wrong About the Trenches

If you’ve ever held a piece of paper that’s over a hundred years old, you know that specific smell. It’s sort of sweet, kind of musty, and feels like it’s about to crumble if you breathe on it too hard. For families across the UK, France, and Germany, these scraps of paper—first world war letters—are often the only physical tether left to a great-grandfather who vanished into the mud of the Somme or the tall grass of the Marne.

But here’s the thing. Most of what we think we know about these letters is a bit of a Hollywood myth. We imagine every soldier was a poetic soul writing heartbreaking prose by candlelight. Honestly? A lot of them were just complaining about the jam. Or the lice. Or the fact that their socks had disintegrated three weeks ago.

The Massive Logistics of the Trench Post

It’s hard to wrap your head around the scale. During the Great War, the British Army Postal Service was moving roughly 12 million letters a week. Think about that. No computers. No automated sorting. Just thousands of people in the Home Depot (a massive wooden structure in London’s Regent’s Park) manually sorting mail for millions of men moving across a fluid, violent landscape.

A letter could get from a London suburb to a front-line trench in France in about two days. That’s faster than some first-class mail moves today.

Soldiers lived for the "mail call." It was the only thing that kept them human. When you’re living in a hole in the ground, surrounded by industrial-scale death, a note from your mum about the prize-winning marrow in her garden isn't just news. It’s a lifeline. It’s proof that a world exists where people don't spend their afternoons trying not to get hit by shrapnel.

What the Censors Didn't Want You to Know

You can’t talk about first world war letters without talking about the "Blue Envelope."

Most mail was read by the soldier's own junior officers. Imagine having to write a love letter knowing your 21-year-old lieutenant—who you probably don't even like—is going to read every mushy word. It created a weirdly sanitized version of the war. Soldiers couldn't mention specific locations, upcoming attacks, or how much they hated the food, because the brass didn't want to leak intelligence or tank morale back home.

👉 See also: Black Red Wing Shoes: Why the Heritage Flex Still Wins in 2026

Then there was the Honor Envelope. This was the Green Envelope (often called blue in some regions due to ink/paper variations). If a soldier used one of these, he signed a declaration that the letter contained only private family matters and no military secrets. These were only opened by censors at the base, meaning your local officer wouldn't see your private business.

But even with censors, the truth leaked out. You see it in the margins. You see it in the handwriting that gets shakier as the months go on.

The Language of the "Tommy"

The tone of these letters is jarringly casual. We expect "Dulce et Decorum est," but we usually get "Dear Mary, hope you are well, the weather is rotten."

British soldiers, the "Tommies," developed a specific slang that filled their correspondence. They talked about "Blighty"—a wound serious enough to get you sent home to England, but not serious enough to kill you. They talked about "plum and apple" jam, which was apparently the only flavor the army knew how to produce, much to everyone's eternal annoyance.

Historians like Peter H. Liddle, who founded the Liddle Collection at the University of Leeds, have pointed out that these letters serve as a psychological defense mechanism. By focusing on the mundane, the soldiers kept the horror at bay. If you write about the mud, it’s just mud. If you write about the fact that your best friend was vaporized by a shell five minutes ago, you might not be able to keep going.

Real Examples: The mundane vs. the monumental

Take the letters of Captain Charles May. He wrote to his wife, Bessie, almost every day. On the eve of the Somme, his tone shifted. He wrote about his "deep love" for her and their daughter, Maude. He wasn't being flowery for the sake of it; he knew he was probably going to die. He did. On July 1st, 1916.

✨ Don't miss: Finding the Right Word That Starts With AJ for Games and Everyday Writing

Then you have someone like Private Ted Ambrose. His letters are full of requests for cigarettes and "acid drops" (candy). He wasn't trying to be a hero on paper. He was a teenager who was hungry and bored.

The contrast is where the real history lives.

The Myth of Universal Literacy

We often assume everyone in 1914 could read and write fluently. That’s not quite right. While literacy rates were higher than in previous wars, many soldiers struggled. You’ll see letters where the spelling is phonetic, or where a comrade has clearly written the letter on behalf of someone else.

This created a "communal" writing culture. A group of men would huddle around while one person, perhaps the most educated in the platoon, would scribe for everyone else. This meant that first world war letters weren't always private. They were often shared experiences, edited by the group to make sure "Ma" didn't worry too much.

The French and German Perspective

It wasn't just the British, obviously. The French Poilus and the German Feldgrau were doing the exact same thing.

German letters (Feldpost) often feel more heavy-hearted in the later years of the war. By 1917, the British blockade was starving Germany. Soldiers would receive letters from home describing how there was no bread, no coal, nothing. Imagine being in a trench, freezing, and getting a letter from your wife saying your children are fainting from hunger. The psychological toll of those letters was arguably more damaging than the Allied artillery.

🔗 Read more: Is there actually a legal age to stay home alone? What parents need to know

French letters often focused on the "sacred soil." Because the war was happening in France, the stakes felt more domestic. They weren't fighting in a far-off land; they were fighting in the next village over.

Why We Still Care About These Scraps of Paper

In a world of "likes" and "disappearing messages," there is something haunting about a physical object that survived a mortar blast.

These letters are the ultimate "anti-history." Official military records tell you how many yards were gained or lost. They tell you the caliber of the guns. They don't tell you how a man felt when he realized he’d forgotten the sound of his wife’s voice.

Digital archives like Europeana 1914-1918 have spent years digitizing thousands of these documents. It’s a race against time. Paper becomes acidic. Ink fades. The families who kept these letters in shoeboxes in the attic are passing away, and their kids don't always know what they have.

How to Read Them Today (Without Damaging History)

If you happen to find some of these in your family archives, please, stop touching them with your bare hands. The oils on your skin are basically acid to 100-year-old paper.

Actionable Steps for Preserving or Researching War Letters:

  • Scan, Don’t Photocopy: The bright light and heat of a photocopier can damage the fibers. Use a high-resolution flatbed scanner once, then put the original away.
  • Use Acid-Free Folders: Do not keep them in plastic "cling" photo albums from the 90s. Those are death traps for paper. Buy archival-grade, acid-free sleeves.
  • Check the Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC): If you have a name from a letter but don't know what happened to the person, the CWGC database is the gold standard for finding where they are buried or commemorated.
  • Look for the "Regimental Museum": Most British regiments have their own small museums. They are often desperate for copies of letters from their men to help flesh out the unit's history.
  • Read the Silences: When you read first world war letters, pay attention to what isn't said. If a soldier suddenly stops talking about his friends, or stops asking about home, it usually means something shifted in his psyche.

Understanding these letters isn't about glorifying war. It's about recognizing the desperate, mundane, and deeply human effort to stay connected when the world is falling apart. They remind us that history isn't made of "forces" or "movements." It's made of people who really, really wanted some better jam and a pair of dry socks.

If you’re looking to dive deeper, start by searching the National Archives or the Imperial War Museum’s online collections. You can search by surname or regiment. Often, you’ll find that the "boring" letters—the ones about the weather and the tea—are the ones that actually tell you the most about what it was like to survive the Great War.

Digitize your own family's history before the ink disappears forever. Once those letters are gone, that person’s voice is gone with them.