Words are weird. They shift under our feet like sand. If you walked through a major city ten years ago, you probably heard the word "homeless" used as a blanket label for everyone from the guy sleeping on a park bench to the family living in a beat-up sedan. But things have changed. People are realizing that labels can be pretty heavy, and honestly, they often miss the point entirely. If you’re looking for another term for homeless, you’re probably realizing that the old vocabulary just doesn't cut it anymore when you're trying to describe the reality of people's lives without stripping away their dignity.
It's not just about being "politically correct," though that's what some people complain about. It’s actually about precision.
When we talk about someone "being" homeless, we make it sound like a personality trait or a permanent state of being, like having blue eyes or being tall. It's not. It’s a temporary circumstance. That’s why you’ve likely seen a massive shift toward "person-first" language. This isn't just academic fluff; it's a fundamental change in how social workers, city planners, and even the guy at the local coffee shop view their neighbors.
Why "Unhoused" Became the New Standard
You’ve probably heard the term unhoused or houseless a lot lately. In places like Los Angeles or Seattle, it's basically the default now. But why?
The logic is pretty simple: a "home" is a social and emotional concept, while a "house" is a physical structure. Many people who lack a permanent roof still have a sense of home—whether that’s a community, a specific neighborhood, or a family unit. They have a home; they just don't have a house to put it in. Organizations like the National Health Care for the Homeless Council have increasingly leaned into these distinctions because they emphasize that the problem is a lack of infrastructure, not a lack of character.
It feels different, doesn't it? Saying someone is "unhoused" focuses the attention on the system that failed to provide housing. Saying someone is "homeless" often feels like it's focusing on a deficit in the person themselves.
💡 You might also like: How many days in a half year: Why the answer is weirder than you think
The Technical Reality: PEH and Housing Insecurity
If you’re reading a government report or a grant application for a non-profit, you aren’t going to see the word "homeless" much at all. Instead, you’ll run into PEH, which stands for People Experiencing Homelessness.
It’s a mouthful. It’s clunky. Nobody says "PEH" at the dinner table. But in a professional or medical setting, it's vital. It uses a verb—"experiencing"—to show that this is a transient phase of life. It’s something happening to them, not who they are. It’s like saying someone is "experiencing a cold" instead of saying they are a "sneezing person."
Then there’s housing insecurity. This is a much broader net.
Think about the single mom who is working two jobs but still can’t quite make rent, so she’s couch-surfing with her sister. Or the student living in a dorm who has nowhere to go during winter break because their parents’ house was foreclosed on. These people aren't "homeless" in the way we traditionally picture it—they aren't on the street—but they are absolutely housing insecure. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) uses these specific tiers to decide who gets help and when. If we only used one word, these people would fall through the cracks because they don't "look" like the stereotype.
Addressing the "Transient" Label
Back in the day, "transient" was a common legal and social term. You’ll still see it in old police codes or city ordinances. Honestly, it’s a pretty cold word. It implies someone who is just passing through, someone who doesn't belong to the community.
Today, using "transient" is generally looked down upon because it strips away the humanity of the individual. It makes them sound like a ghost or a statistics point. If you’re looking for another term for homeless that sounds professional but still respectful, "person in transition" is sometimes used, though it's less common.
The Nuance of "Rough Sleeping"
In the UK and Australia, you’ll hear the term rough sleeping constantly. This specifically refers to people sleeping outside—in doorways, parks, or bus shelters. It’s a very descriptive, blunt term. It doesn’t sugarcoat the situation.
The value here is that it differentiates between someone who is "homeless" but staying in a shelter (which is still dangerous and unstable, but at least there's a roof) and someone who is literally exposed to the elements. During the 2023-2024 winter storms in the Midwest, this distinction became a matter of life and death. Emergency services needed to know exactly who was "rough sleeping" to get them into warming centers immediately.
Why Do These Words Keep Changing?
It’s called the "euphemism treadmill." It’s a concept in linguistics where a word starts out as a neutral description, then gathers a negative stigma over time, so we invent a new word to escape that stigma. Eventually, the new word gets stigmatized too, and the cycle repeats.
Think about it. Once, "vagrancy" was the standard term. Then "homeless" replaced it because "vagrancy" sounded like a crime. Now, "unhoused" is replacing "homeless" because "homeless" carries the weight of decades of judgment.
Is it annoying to keep up with? Maybe. But if you’re trying to actually solve the problem, language is a tool. Using a more humanizing term can be the difference between a community voting for a new low-income housing project or voting against it out of fear of "the homeless."
Hidden Homelessness: The "Doubled-Up" Population
We need to talk about people who are doubled-up. This is a term you’ll find in school districts. Under the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, children who lack a "fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence" are considered homeless. This includes kids living in motels, trailer parks, or sharing the housing of other persons due to loss of housing or economic hardship.
For a teenager, being called "homeless" is a nightmare. It carries a massive social cost. But being "doubled-up"? That’s a term their guidance counselor can use to get them free lunch and transportation without making the kid feel like an outcast in the hallway.
Looking at Language Through an International Lens
Different cultures handle this differently. In some parts of Europe, you’ll hear terms like socially excluded or vulnerable adults. These terms are much broader than just housing. They suggest that the person has been pushed to the margins of society in multiple ways—unemployment, lack of healthcare, and housing.
It reminds us that a house isn't the only thing missing. Often, there’s a lack of a "social safety net," which is another term we use to describe the systems that should prevent someone from ending up on the street in the first place.
Actionable Insights: How to Choose Your Words
If you’re a writer, a student, or just someone who wants to be a decent human being, here is how you should navigate using another term for homeless in 2026:
- Context is king. If you are writing a technical report for a government agency, use PEH (People Experiencing Homelessness) or housing insecure.
- Be specific. If you’re talking about people in tents, say unhoused neighbors or unsheltered individuals. If you’re talking about people in cars, say vehicularly housed.
- Follow the lead of the person you're talking about. If someone refers to themselves as "homeless," don't correct them. That’s their lived experience. But if you are speaking generally, opt for unhoused or person-first language.
- Avoid labels that imply permanence. Skip words like "the homeless" (using it as a noun). Instead, use it as a descriptor: "people who are homeless." It’s a small tweak, but it makes a huge difference in how the brain processes the information.
- Recognize the "Invisible Homeless." Remember that many people without a permanent address are working full-time jobs. Using terms like economically displaced can help highlight that this is often a financial issue rather than a mental health or substance abuse issue, which are the common (and often incorrect) stereotypes.
The goal of changing our language isn't to hide the reality of the situation. The reality is often brutal. The goal is to make sure we don't let our words become a barrier to seeing the person standing in front of us. When we use more accurate terms like unhoused or housing insecure, we stop looking at "a problem" and start looking at people who are currently navigating a really difficult set of circumstances.
👉 See also: Why the Strawberry and Cream Cheese Croissant is Actually Harder to Get Right Than You Think
Next time you're about to use a label, take a second to think about what you're actually trying to say. Are you talking about a lack of a building? A lack of a support system? A temporary crisis? Choose the word that fits the person, not the stereotype.