You're at a bar. Or maybe a coffee shop. You see two people sitting across from each other, leaning in, laughing a little too hard at mediocre jokes. What are they doing? Most people say they’re dating. But honestly, if you asked them, they might say they’re "seeing each other," "talking," or "hanging out." Language is weird like that. People have been searching for another name for dating since the dawn of social rituals because the word "dating" itself feels heavy, clinical, or just plain scary.
Words matter. They define the "vibe."
Back in the 1920s, a "date" was actually a radical concept. Before then, you had "calling." A man would show up at a woman's house, sit in the parlor with her parents, and drink tea. Boring? Totally. When the shift happened toward going out to movies or jazz clubs—spending money on a specific date and time—the term "dating" was born. It was commercial. It was public. Now, in the 2020s, we’re circling back to ambiguity. We want labels that don't commit us to anything before we’re sure.
The Evolution of "Talking" and "Situationships"
The most common modern synonym you'll hear among Gen Z and Millennials is "talking." It sounds casual. It sounds like nothing. But in reality, "talking" is often just another name for dating without the expectations of a formal title. If you tell your friends you're "talking" to someone, it implies an exclusive or semi-exclusive emotional connection, but if things go south, you can claim you weren't actually together. It’s a linguistic safety net.
📖 Related: Drawing an Easy Motorbike Without Messing Up the Proportions
Then there’s the "situationship." This isn't just slang; it’s a recognized social phenomenon. Sociologist Elizabeth Armstrong from the University of Michigan has noted how these gray-area relationships reflect a broader delay in traditional adulthood milestones. A situationship is dating without the contract. It’s the "it's complicated" of the modern era. People use it because it describes the space between a hookup and a boyfriend/girlfriend dynamic. It’s messy. It’s confusing. It’s incredibly common.
Some call it "kickin’ it." Others call it "chilling."
Courtship: The Traditional Alternative
If you’re looking for a term that feels a bit more "Old World" or intentional, "courtship" is the heavy hitter. It’s not just for people in Jane Austen novels or episodes of Bridgerton. In many religious or traditional communities, courtship is the preferred term. Unlike dating, which can be aimless, courtship usually implies a specific goal: marriage.
Research from the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships often distinguishes between "recreational dating" and "procreational or marital courtship." One is for fun; the other is a vetting process. When you say you are courting someone, you aren't just getting tacos. You are evaluating a life partner. It’s high-stakes.
There is also "seeing someone." This is the middle ground. It’s more serious than "talking" but less formal than "in a relationship." If you’re seeing someone, you’ve likely cleared the three-month hurdle. You’re probably not active on Tinder anymore, but you haven't had the "Talk" with a capital T yet.
Why We Keep Inventing New Terms
Psychologically, humans love to categorize. We need boxes to put people in so we know how to act. If I call what we're doing "hanging out," I don't have to buy you a Valentine's Day gift. If I call it "seeing each other," I probably do.
Dr. Helen Fisher, a biological anthropologist and well-known expert on human attraction, has written extensively about "slow love." She suggests that the modern tendency to avoid the word "dating" is actually an adaptive strategy. We are extending the pre-commitment phase to ensure better long-term matches. By using another name for dating—one that feels less pressurized—we allow the brain's attachment systems to develop without the "fight or flight" response that often comes with heavy labels.
- Hooking up: Usually implies physical intimacy first.
- Going steady: A total throwback to the 1950s that is actually making a small, ironic comeback in certain subcultures.
- Main squeeze: Old school, slightly cringey, but still used in casual conversation.
- Keeping company: If you’re over 80 or live in a rural village in 1912.
The Professional Side: "Networking" or "Socializing"?
Sometimes, dating happens under the guise of something else entirely. In high-pressure cities like New York or London, "networking" can often be another name for dating. You meet at a professional event, you grab a "business drink," and suddenly you’re talking about your childhood fears over a third glass of Pinot Noir.
There’s also "matchmaking." While this usually refers to the service provided by a third party, some people describe their dating life as "being match-made." It shifts the agency. It makes the process feel more curated and less like a chaotic swipe-fest.
Cultural Variations Across the Globe
In Japan, the term Gokon refers to a group blind date. It’s structured. It’s specific. It’s not just "dating"; it’s a collective social exercise. In France, the concept of a "date" doesn't even have a direct linguistic equivalent in the same way. You don't "go on a date" (un rencard); you just meet up. The lack of a specific word reflects a culture where romance is integrated more fluidly into social life rather than being a compartmentalized event with a start and end time.
In the UK, you might "shag" or "pull," but when it gets serious, you’re "properly seeing" someone. The modifiers do all the heavy lifting.
Real Talk: The Risks of Ambiguity
While having another name for dating can lower anxiety, it can also lead to what psychologists call "relationship uncertainty." If one person thinks they are "talking" and the other thinks they are "courting," someone is going to get hurt.
The Journal of Marriage and Family published a study showing that clear communication about relationship status is one of the highest predictors of relationship satisfaction. Basically, call it whatever you want—call it "frolicking" if you must—but make sure the person you're frolicking with is on the same page.
Using Technology to Define the Term
Apps have forced us to invent new names. We have "matches," "connections," and "mutuals."
Think about the term "breadcrumbing." It’s a form of dating, albeit a terrible one. Or "benching." These aren't just slang terms; they are specific descriptions of behaviors within the dating ecosystem. They provide a name for the nuance that the broad word "dating" fails to capture.
🔗 Read more: Is the Birkin bag Walmart sells actually real? Here is what is happening
Sometimes, people use "entanglement." Thanks, Jada Pinkett Smith. That one took over the internet for a year because it perfectly described a complex, non-traditional romantic connection. It’s another name for dating when "dating" feels too simple for the mess you’ve gotten yourself into.
Actionable Steps for Navigating the "Name" Game
If you're tired of the ambiguity or just trying to figure out what to call your current situation, here is how you handle the nomenclature:
Audit your own feelings first. Before you worry about the label, figure out what you actually want. Are you looking for a "courtship" (marriage track) or just someone to "hang out" with on Tuesday nights? Use the word that matches your intent.
Ask the "What are we?" question without the cringe. You don't have to be dramatic. Use a phrase like, "I've been telling my friends we're 'seeing each other,' does that feel right to you?" It opens the door for them to offer their own preferred name for the relationship.
Look for consistency over labels. A label is just a word. If someone calls you their "partner" but doesn't text you back for three days, the name doesn't matter. Focus on the behavior.
Embrace the "Seeing Each Other" phase. Don't rush into "boyfriend/girlfriend" if you aren't ready. There's a reason we have so many names for this stage—it's a distinct part of the human experience. Enjoy the "talking" phase. It’s often the most exciting part because of the mystery.
Be honest about "Exclusivity." This is the biggest trap. Never assume that a casual name (like "hanging out") implies exclusivity. If you haven't explicitly agreed to be exclusive, assume they are still "talking" to other people.
Ultimately, whether you call it dating, courting, seeing someone, or an entanglement, the goal remains the same: connection. The words are just the map; the relationship is the actual journey. Don't get so caught up in the legend that you forget to look at the view.
Next time you find yourself wondering what to call that person you’ve been grabbing dinner with every week, remember that language evolves. If none of the current terms fit, make one up. "Romantic auditing" has a nice, professional ring to it, doesn't it? Or maybe just stick to "seeing each other." It’s a classic for a reason. It’s honest. You’re seeing them, they’re seeing you, and for now, that’s plenty.
The most important thing isn't the name you use. It's the clarity behind it. If you use a synonym to hide your feelings, you're doing it wrong. If you use it to describe a specific, nuanced stage of life, you're a linguistic genius. Choose wisely. Labels have power, but only as much as you give them.