You probably remember Ben Stein as the monotone economics teacher from Ferris Bueller’s Day Off or the guy who wanted to give you his money on that Comedy Central game show. But back in 2008, he went on a completely different mission. He wasn’t looking for Ferris; he was looking for God in the laboratory. The result was Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, a documentary that remains one of the most polarizing pieces of media ever to hit theaters. Honestly, whether you love it or hate it usually depends on what you think about Darwin.
The movie isn't just a "science" doc. It’s a culture war manifesto. Basically, Stein traveled around interviewing scientists and academics who claimed they were "expelled" from their jobs for even mentioning Intelligent Design (ID). You’ve got people like Richard Sternberg and Guillermo Gonzalez who say their careers were tanked because they didn't toe the line on evolution. Stein’s whole vibe in the film is "the curious investigator," but he’s clearly got an axe to grind against what he calls "Big Science."
Why Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed Still Sparks Arguments
The core of the movie is the idea of academic freedom. Stein argues that the scientific establishment is a "dictatorship" that suppresses any evidence of a creator. He uses a lot of Cold War imagery—think Berlin Wall and secret police—to suggest that Darwinism is a dogmatic ideology rather than just a theory.
One of the wildest parts of Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed is when it connects the theory of evolution to Nazi Germany. Stein actually visits concentration camps and interviews historians to argue that "survival of the fittest" provided the philosophical permit for the Holocaust. As you can imagine, this did not go over well with critics. Most scientists, like P.Z. Myers and Richard Dawkins (who both appeared in the film), were pretty livid about how their interviews were edited. They felt they were lured in under false pretenses—the producers told them the movie was called Crossroads, not Expelled.
👉 See also: Prince Caspian Narnia 2: Why This Darker Sequel Still Divides Fans Today
The Science (Or Lack Thereof)
If you're looking for a deep dive into biology, you're gonna be disappointed. The film doesn't really explain what Intelligent Design is in a technical way. It mostly focuses on the politics of the debate.
- Irreducible Complexity: It touches on the idea that some cellular structures are too complex to have evolved step-by-step.
- The Origin of Life: Stein grills Dawkins on how the first cell started. Dawkins famously admitted that life could have been "seeded" by an alien civilization, which Stein jumped on as a "gotcha" moment.
- The Consensus: The scientific community, including the AAAS, basically issued a collective eye-roll. They argued that ID isn't science because it can't be tested or proven wrong.
The Box Office Surprise
Despite being panned by almost every major critic, the movie actually did decent business at first. It opened in over 1,000 theaters, which is huge for a documentary. It made about $7.7 million total. Not Passion of the Christ numbers, but it proved there was a massive audience of people who felt like their religious views were being mocked by the "elites."
Kinda crazy to think about now, but this film was the peak of the Intelligent Design movement. Since then, the debate has mostly shifted from movie theaters to school board meetings and internet forums.
What Most People Get Wrong
A lot of people think the movie was trying to prove God exists. It wasn't, at least not directly. It was trying to prove that scientists aren't allowed to say God exists. There's a subtle difference there. Stein’s argument was less about "here is the evidence for ID" and more about "look at these people getting fired for their thoughts."
Whether the people mentioned—like Caroline Crocker or Robert Marks—were actually "fired" for their views is still a point of massive contention. Investigations by groups like the NCSE found that in many of these cases, there were other factors involved, like lack of research funding or failed tenure reviews. But in the world of Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, it was a straight-up conspiracy.
Actionable Insights for the Curious
If you’re going to watch it today, or if you’re arguing about it online, here’s how to handle it:
👉 See also: Jackson 5 I'll Be There: Why This Ballad Changed Everything
- Watch the Uncut Interviews: If you can find the raw footage of the Dawkins or Myers interviews, do it. It shows how much the "narrative" was shaped in the editing room.
- Separate the Philosophy from the Biology: You can agree with Stein that academics should have more freedom without necessarily agreeing that ID is a valid scientific theory.
- Check the Sources: Look up the specific cases mentioned, like the Smithsonian controversy involving Richard Sternberg. The official reports from those institutions tell a very different story than the movie.
The legacy of Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed is basically a blueprint for how the culture war operates today. It’s loud, it’s defensive, and it’s deeply suspicious of experts. Whether you think Ben Stein was a hero for free speech or a purveyor of propaganda, you can't deny the film hit a nerve that is still raw almost twenty years later.