So, it’s 1999. The world is collectively losing its mind over the Y2K bug. People are hoarding bottled water and canned beans, convinced that every computer on the planet is about to explode at the stroke of midnight. Amidst all this digital doom-and-gloom, 20th Century Fox drops a heist movie that basically says, "Hey, while the banks are rebooting, why don't we just steal $8 billion?"
That movie was Entrapment.
If you grew up in the late 90s, you definitely remember the poster. It had Sean Connery looking distinguished as ever and Catherine Zeta-Jones in a black catsuit. It’s the quintessential "they don't make 'em like this anymore" flick. It wasn't trying to build a cinematic universe or set up a five-film franchise. It was just a sleek, slightly preposterous, and incredibly charismatic caper that paired the world’s most famous ex-Bond with the hottest rising star of the decade.
The Laser Scene: More Than Just Fan Service?
Let’s be real for a second. If you mention this movie to anyone, they immediately think of the lasers. You know the one. Catherine Zeta-Jones, playing the "investigator-turned-thief" Virginia "Gin" Baker, has to navigate a 3D grid of security lasers to steal a Chinese mask.
It’s been parodied, analyzed, and talked about for over 25 years.
Honestly, the scene is kind of a masterclass in tension, even if the physics are... well, Hollywood physics. Gin uses her ballet background (Zeta-Jones actually has one in real life) to contort through the beams. The movie tries to explain the "tech" by having Robert "Mac" MacDougal (Connery) set up his own laser projectors to "blind" the sensors, but basically, it’s an excuse for some high-stakes gymnastics.
👉 See also: Ted Nugent State of Shock: Why This 1979 Album Divides Fans Today
Fun fact: The Mythbusters actually took a crack at this. They proved that most of those "evading the sensor" tricks wouldn't work in a real-world high-security vault. But who cares? Watching Gin practice with red yarn in Mac’s Scottish castle is way more entertaining than a realistic documentary on security systems.
That Age Gap: What People Got Wrong
There was a huge uproar back then—and it still pops up in Reddit threads today—about the age difference. Sean Connery was 69. Catherine Zeta-Jones was 30. That’s a 39-year gap.
Critics at the time, and many feminists, argued it reinforced the "older man, much younger woman" trope that Hollywood loves to cling to. Roger Ebert actually defended it in his review, noting that the movie establishes "ground rules" early on. Mac tells Gin that thievery is a business with no room for personal relationships.
The tension in the movie isn't just "will they, won't they." It’s actually built on a foundation of mutual professional respect and, eventually, a weird kind of "honor among thieves" mentorship. Plus, let's be honest: Sean Connery at 69 still had more screen presence and "cool" than most actors half his age. He played Mac with this weary, intelligent vibe that made the attraction feel less like a "dirty old man" situation and more like two sharks recognizing each other in a tank full of minnows.
The Plot Twist That Keeps You Guessing
The movie is a giant shell game. You think you know who’s conning who, and then the rug gets pulled.
✨ Don't miss: Mike Judge Presents: Tales from the Tour Bus Explained (Simply)
- The Hook: Gin is an insurance investigator trying to catch Mac in the act of stealing a Rembrandt.
- The Shift: She convinces him she’s actually a thief who wants to team up.
- The Twist: Mac reveals he was caught years ago and is actually working for the FBI to entrap her.
- The Final Turn: In the end, Mac realizes he loves the game (and maybe Gin) more than his freedom, helping her escape with billions while leaving the FBI with a fraction of the haul.
The ending at the Bukit Jalil LRT station in Malaysia (which the movie calls "Pudu" station) is genuinely sweet. Mac slips her a gun and some documents, letting her slip away onto a train while he stays behind to face the music. It's a classic "gentleman thief" move that fits Connery’s persona perfectly.
Why Malaysia Was Mad at the Movie
You’d think filming at the Petronas Twin Towers—at the time the tallest buildings in the world—would be a PR win for Malaysia. The government actually went all out to help the production. They handled visas, cleared customs, and provided security.
Then the movie came out.
Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad was not happy. The film's editors had spliced shots of the ultra-modern Petronas Towers with footage of slums from Malacca, making it look like the world's most advanced skyscraper was sitting right next to a shanty town. The government felt it portrayed the country as "backward."
It actually led to the movie being banned in Malaysia for a while, though it eventually made its way to pay TV. Looking back, it was a classic case of Hollywood "geographic creative license" gone wrong.
🔗 Read more: Big Brother 27 Morgan: What Really Happened Behind the Scenes
Actionable Takeaways for Movie Buffs
If you haven't watched Entrapment in a decade, it’s worth a re-watch, but you have to go in with the right mindset.
- Watch it for the Chemistry: Connery and Zeta-Jones have better rapport than most modern CGI-heavy action duos.
- Ignore the Tech Logic: This was made when the "Millennium Bug" was a terrifying mystery. The scenes of them "hacking" into the International Clearance Bank look hilarious by 2026 standards, but they’re a great time capsule.
- Appreciate the Locations: The film moves from a New York penthouse (actually filmed in London) to a real Scottish castle (Duart Castle) to the stunning skyline of Kuala Lumpur. It’s a visual feast.
- Look for the "Bond" Nods: Since it's Connery, there are dozens of little moments that feel like a wink to his 007 days—the gadgetry, the tuxedo, the smooth escapes.
The movie isn't a deep philosophical masterpiece. It’s a $66 million heist flick that ended up making $212 million because it knew exactly what it was: a stylish, romantic adventure. It’s the kind of movie you catch on a rainy Sunday afternoon and end up watching the whole thing because you just can't look away from those two stars.
Pro-tip for travelers: You can actually visit Mac’s "hideout." Duart Castle on the Isle of Mull is open to visitors during the summer. It’s a 13th-century seat of the Clan MacLean and is every bit as dramatic in person as it looks on screen. Just don't try to sneak in through the underwater vents; they don't actually exist.
To get the most out of your re-watch, keep an eye on Ving Rhames and Will Patton. They play the "handlers" of this high-stakes game, and their side-eye at Mac and Gin’s antics is one of the most underrated parts of the film.
Key Movie Facts at a Glance
- Director: Jon Amiel
- Budget: $66 million
- Box Office: $212.1 million
- Rotten Tomatoes Score: 40% (Though audience scores are generally much higher)
- Millennium Bug Heist Amount: $8 billion (Mac only lets the FBI keep $1 billion)
- Filming Locations: London, Scotland, Malaysia, New York (limited)
If you're looking for a double feature, pair this with The Thomas Crown Affair (the 1999 Pierce Brosnan version). Both films captured that specific late-90s "elegant thief" vibe before the Ocean's Eleven remake changed the genre forever.
For those interested in the filming history, keep in mind that many of the "New York" interiors were actually the Lloyd's of London building. The distinctive, high-tech look of that office was a favorite for 90s filmmakers—it also appeared in Hackers and the 1998 Avengers movie.
Next time you see a "smart" security system, just remember Gin Baker and her red yarn. It was a simpler time for high-stakes robbery.