It happened in a flash. On January 20, 2025, during a rally celebrating Donald Trump’s second inauguration at the Capital One Arena, Elon Musk did something that sent the internet into a tailspin. He jumped on stage, danced a bit, and then—depending on who you ask—either expressed his "heartfelt" gratitude or performed a gesture with deep, dark historical roots.
He slapped his hand to his chest and thrust his arm upward, palm down. Twice.
The footage went nuclear. Within hours, the phrase elon musk nazi salute wikipedia began trending as users raced to the digital encyclopedia to see how the event was being recorded for history. What followed was a brutal edit war, a series of fiery posts on X, and a debate that pitted historians against tech enthusiasts.
The Wikipedia Edit War and the "Wokepedia" Backlash
Wikipedia is supposed to be the "neutral" arbiter of facts, but neutrality is hard to find when a billionaire is involved. Almost immediately after the rally, editors began updating Musk’s biography. Some added a section titled "Elon Musk Nazi salute controversy," while others fought to keep the language vague, calling it a "controversial gesture" or a "Roman salute."
Musk didn't take it lying down. He’s been a critic of Wikipedia for years—famously offering a billion dollars to rename it "Dickipedia"—but this felt different. He blasted the site on X, claiming it had become an "extension of legacy media propaganda."
💡 You might also like: Michael Collins of Ireland: What Most People Get Wrong
He essentially argued that because Wikipedia relies on sources like CNN or The New York Times, and those outlets called the gesture a Nazi salute, the site was inherently biased. This sparked a massive surge in interest for his own AI alternative, Grok, and a project dubbed "Grokipedia" aimed at pulling the top million articles and "correcting" them.
What Do the Experts Actually Say?
Is it a salute or just an awkward wave? Honestly, it’s complicated.
Ruth Ben-Ghiat, a professor at NYU and an expert on fascism, was blunt. She called it "a Nazi salute—and a very belligerent one too." On the other side of the fence, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) initially took a more conciliatory tone, suggesting it was an "awkward gesture in a moment of enthusiasm." That stance didn't sit well with everyone; former ADL director Abraham Foxman disagreed, labeling it a "Heil Hitler" salute.
Here is how the public saw it, according to a YouGov survey conducted shortly after:
📖 Related: Margaret Thatcher Explained: Why the Iron Lady Still Divides Us Today
- 42% of respondents viewed it as either a Nazi or Roman salute.
- 42% viewed it as a "gesture from the heart."
- 49% of those who saw it as a Nazi salute believed it was intentional.
In Germany, where Nazi symbols are strictly illegal, the reaction was even harsher. German newspapers like Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung argued it was impossible for someone of Musk’s stature to be unaware of the symbolism. Meanwhile, Musk’s supporters, like Andrea Stroppa, claimed it was a "Roman salute," signaling a return to ancient strength—though historians are quick to point out that the "Roman salute" is largely a 19th-century invention later adopted by Mussolini.
The Breakdown of the Gesture
Musk’s daughter, Vivian Jenna Wilson, even weighed in, reportedly calling the gesture "definitely a Nazi salute" in social media posts. The physical mechanics of the move were what triggered the Wikipedia editors:
- The Chest Slap: Hand over the heart.
- The Extension: Right arm thrust forward and upward at a diagonal angle.
- The Palm: Flat, facing downward.
- The Repetition: He did it toward the front crowd, then turned and did it for the people behind him.
The "Asperger's" Defense and Social Awkwardness
A common thread in the elon musk nazi salute wikipedia discussion is the suggestion that Musk’s neurodivergence plays a role. Supporters argue that because Musk has spoken about being on the autism spectrum, he often makes stiff or "cringey" movements that don't carry the same social weight as they would for others.
However, many in the autistic community have pushed back on this. They argue that being on the spectrum doesn't naturally result in performing specific, politically charged gestures. It’s a messy debate because it tries to map internal intent onto external movement, which is something Wikipedia editors struggled to verify.
👉 See also: Map of the election 2024: What Most People Get Wrong
How This Impacts the Information War
The real takeaway from the elon musk nazi salute wikipedia saga isn't just about a hand movement. It’s about who controls the narrative.
Musk’s "Community Notes" feature on X is his answer to Wikipedia. He believes that a crowdsourced consensus of users from different political backgrounds is more "truthful" than a curated encyclopedia. This incident became the ultimate test case. While Wikipedia editors were debating the word "Nazi," X users were busy adding context to posts, some defending him and others doubling down on the criticism.
If you’re trying to find the "objective truth" here, you’re going to have a hard time. The Wikipedia page currently exists as a "salute controversy" article, noting both the accusations and Musk’s denials. It’s a stalemate.
To stay informed on how this story develops, you should:
- Check the "Talk" page on Wikipedia: This is where the real fight happens. You can see the arguments editors are having behind the scenes about which sources to include.
- Compare Grok vs. Wikipedia: If you have access to Grok, ask it about the salute and then read the Wikipedia entry. The difference in framing is a masterclass in modern media bias.
- Watch the Raw Footage: Don't rely on screenshots. Watch the video of the Capital One Arena rally. Look at the context of the speech—he was thanking voters and talking about the "future of civilization."
Ultimately, the controversy highlights a growing divide in how we consume "facts." Whether it was a malicious signal to the far-right or a clumsy "thank you" from a billionaire who doesn't do "normal" very well, it has permanently changed how we look at the digital record of our time.